Musharraf has turned it into an art on how to fool the international Community into giving billions and Keeping him in power. All complete with well choreographed acts like assassination attempts, blasts, raids into waziristan, troops kidnapped, Emergency, nukes in danger, Gadwar port handed to China, Osama sacks Islamabad, etc.. etc%u2026 etc.. Whenever accountability is sought from him a new act is unveiled .The fact remains Taliban till today is a wholly owned subsidiary of pakistan ISI with the objective to control Afghanistan and be the reason for west to pay billions of $$ in rent/aid/Arms to Pakistan Army which includes Talibans salary supplemented by drug trade.
I dont understand this concept of 'them'. you mean the whole nation has no common sense? Pakistan is just an unfortunate country run medieval war lords. They are facing the same problem as India. Lack of leadership. Thats why we should be thankful to people like nehru, patel and gandhi because even if rahul gandhi literally takes a dump in the parliament like his father and mom we will be able to handle him.
RE:Why great
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 06:23 AM Permalink
There is no doubt in my mind that Nehru, Patel and gandhi provided a strong leadership and laid a foundation of an India that is years ahead of its neighbors.
RE:Why great
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 06:22 AM Permalink
really? did Rajiv and sonia take a dump in the parliament? I mean I am sure that their are bathrooms in parliament house, but looks like you mean the place where they do business ... debates, questioning, voting, argument, figthing etc. etc. You said "literally" ... right?
RE:Why great
by ravinandanprakash agrawal on Nov 05, 2007 06:49 AM Permalink
: > yes literally. OK. I didnt mean taking a dump literally. I recant that statement.
I dont compare anyone with anyone. All I know is nehru commenced election in 4 years and we have a parliament, a legal system and civil system in place. No doubt he was a great leader. i dont care if he was a cartoon personally or an idiot or whatever.
RE:Why compare
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 06:26 AM Permalink
He was no cartoon, no idiot, Nehru was a man with vision. He laid emphasis on science and tehnology and setting up of institutions like the IITs.
what does pakistan have in lieu of our IITs? Internation Institutes for Terroism
LOL ... ub sub hanso mere is PJ pur ... jum ke hanso
RE:Why compare
by ravinandanprakash agrawal on Nov 05, 2007 06:52 AM Permalink
Isme hansne ka kuch nahin hai..no one is a terrorist and everybody is a terrorist. Terrorists are just a byproduct of a bad system. we are all are part of that system and the byproduct is our doing and we all are responsible for them not one nation, race, religion or sect. Yes I believe Nehru was a great leader.
Pakistani's dont have any common sense and they are wicked people, we should not allow wicked people to have Nuclear Weapons, Its hard to educate them now,
RE:Wicked People
by ravinandanprakash agrawal on Nov 05, 2007 05:59 AM Permalink
I dont understand this concept of 'them'. you mean the whole nation has no common sense? Pakistan is just an unfortunate country run medieval war lords. They are facing the same problem as India. Lack of leadership. Thats why we should be thankful to people like nehru, patel and gandhi because even if rahul gandhi literally takes a dump in the parliament like his father and mom we will be able to handle him.
%u2022 By education I am a Christian, by culture I am a Muslim, by coincidence I am a Hindu. -> By Mr. Nehru Should we really celebrate his birth date as Children%u2019s day of India? %u2022 I can be called a Donkey, but please do not call me a Hindu. -> By Mr. Nehru Should we call him %u2018Pandit%u2019? %u2022 Compared to western culture & society, Indian society & culture is really low. By Mr. Nehru Was he really a Indian? %u2022 I am very much feared of the Sanatan (Hindu) culture & society. I always hate Sanatan dharm & society. I want to destroy Sanatan religion & society. %uF0E0 from his autobiography. %u2022 After the independence of India, renowned Pandit Darvidshastri jee & Pandit Karpatra jee told Mr. Nehru & Sardar Patel that they can give the draft copy of constitution based on the Ramayan-Mahabharat time & world%u2019s 1st Economist Chanakya pandit%u2019s writing. They (Pandit Darvidshastri jee & Pandit Karpatra jee) did not want their name, they just wanted India%u2019s actual progress.
In the Jawaharlal Nehru University, the joke is that there are professors to spout the Chinese, the German or the American line, but none who support the Indian one. The trouble is that this is no joke. As the fawning supplication before White Trash Sonia Gandhi (and by implication her backers) has shown, we have a long way to go before being free.
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 06:28 AM Permalink
This is all made up. Nehruji had great regard for hinsuism and rights of hindus.
Just another RSS dimwit trying to malign Nehru's image with made up quotes with no mention of source to backup.
RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 06:29 AM Permalink
you read his autobiography, you will come to know how much respect he had about Hinduism & culture.
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 06:38 AM Permalink
Nehru was not even elected by Congress as PM, is was sardar Patel. But it was the Gandhi Jee, who favored Nehru over Patel. It was because of Nehru part of the Kashmir is still occupied by Pakistan, part os our land occupied by China.... Hindi chini Bhai bhai... ha...ha.... now china started claiming Arunachal also as their part.
RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 06:43 AM Permalink
right! that was a smart decision and Sardar himself supported that decision because Sardar Patel's health was deteriorating ... he could not handle PMship ... He died in 1950 and for over a year he was in bed.
So, who would have become India's PM in 1950 after Sardar's death? Now, BJP supporters will say Jinnah the secular and nationalist (LOL @ Advani) except that he was already dead in 1948.
RE:RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 07:01 AM Permalink
If you have read Discovery of India then you will remember that Mr. Nehru saying that Lord Ram was never existed... he was a imaginary character.... he is not god.
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by ravinandanprakash agrawal on Nov 05, 2007 07:22 AM Permalink
Rajeev my freind..dont do it. I also believe in the fact "lost causes are the only causes worth fighting for". But your cause is just a lost cause. Its not worth fighting for. Give up my freind. Everyone has read Discovery of India and every one has seen shyam benegal's version. Yes Nehru has claimed that Lord Ram may be just a legend or just a character out of great literarture. Still he has never negated that it could be a full fledged word to word history. I dont care which one is true because I am an athiest and a follower of Lord Ram because he is cool. Wanna quote a great saying by Subhash babu himself "Mythology is a pictorial representation of the philosophies". Enjoy.
RE:RE:RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 07:06 AM Permalink
He has never said Lord ram never existed ... can you please quote the exact wording from Discovery of India ... you are just making it all up.
RE:RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 06:59 AM Permalink
Nehru was not the real hero for India, it was Sardar Ballav Bhai Patel, Subhash chandra Bose, Bhagat Singh... it was the Nehru who signed a agreement with English that if Bode return back to India, India will handover him to English.
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 07:04 AM Permalink
I do not say that Patel, Bose and Bhagat did not contribute. Bhagat Singh was definitely not a leader .. he acted alone or in a small team, but he did not lead any mass movement.
Sardar and Netaji were great leaders. Netaji was an army defector and so subject to court martial, which I don't expect you to understand. Nehruji didn't make any mistake as Netaji were already dead in a plane crash .... now keep those conspiracy theories on his re-emergence to yourself. Write only what you can prove and backup with a reliable source.
You haven't yet answerred the question of Nehruji's biography. Admit it ... you made up all that stuff. Didn't you?
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by ravinandanprakash agrawal on Nov 05, 2007 07:01 AM Permalink
People i reckon dont waste your time on Rajeev. I didnt understand a single word because it did not make sense. Nehru giving galis to hindus :> and ten he would have the guts to think of becoming the PM through astute follower of raam, mahatma himself. Rajeev must write a book and call it 'history for fun'. Rajeev if you wanna read about Patel and Nehru you would understand that at that point India needed a home minister and a PM. Home minister for India and PM for world issues. there was a lot going on in 1947. Just think for two minutes between these people who would you wanna look after India and who you would like to see with Mountbatten, Churchill, Kennedy and Mao.
RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 07:08 AM Permalink
If you read Ramayana or Ramcharitmanas or even Ramanand Sagar's Ramayan, you will see that the book does not refer to Ram as God ... He is a prince, son of king of Ayodhya, who lives by his values. He obeyed his father to go to banwas and then lead an invasion on Lanka.
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 07:12 AM Permalink
have you read Discovery of India, Please read 1st then you will come to know the actual truth. I am not saying you to read the books written by unknown person, just read Nemru's own written book.
Shayam Benegal Directed serial 'Bharat Ek Khoj' based on the Discovery of India only. It was aired on Durdarshan long back, even in that serial it was shown that Lord ram is a ordinary char.
RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 07:05 AM Permalink
ravinandanprakash jee have you read Discovery of India written by Mr. Nehru? He has clearly written that Ram is not a god at all. He is a normal character. do you agree. if you do not then read the discovery of india 1st.
RE:RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 07:14 AM Permalink
I have read Discovery of India and nowhere does it say anything bad about Lord Ram.
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by mahender on Nov 05, 2007 07:21 AM Permalink
Nehru was a great visionary as far as Science and Technology is concerned(IIT's BARC,ISRO all these institutions are standing monuments of his vision).Being said that Nehru was a bad political visionary...There in no doubt that Patel and Nehru had serioos differences on many issues.Nehru never supported Somnath temple reconstruction.[Source ,go to Sabarmati Gandhi ashram,u will get books on this.].Sacrificing the primeminister post;Patel did it .bcoz Gandhiji requested him to do so..Subash ChandraBose also did the same on Gandhijis words two time.Later he left Congress.
Patel didnot accept Nehrus Chinas policies.If u want to know Patels political vision just read his letter(Source available in Sabarmati Ashram).He writes to Nehru China and India are two big nations who tries to make its impact on Asian region,So there is a natural rift between them. Patel was more like a capitalist.He was more inclined towards United States.He jeered communist model of socialism.And he proved right in political inclination,when chinese invaded India,Nehru requested Russian support for that;Russioans said India is our friend but chineses are our brothers.Later if US didnot intervened(The Then President Kennedy) Indian would have had a bad fate. Manyof this is available in a Book Sardar Patel published by Sabarmati Ashram..So u might not worry about aunthenitcity.
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by mahender on Nov 05, 2007 08:00 AM Permalink
Hi ravi,I believe Gandhiji did this mistake.But it seems Gandhiji was changing in his ideas about Nehru but he was killed before taking any decision on that..Gandhiji was a spiritual person he always followed his heart.So many times he was ambiguous
RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by ravinandanprakash agrawal on Nov 05, 2007 07:29 AM Permalink
Mahender..fantastic. really good. I didnt know about a lots of you wrote. Good job bro. I like you. Lord Ram will be with you. Though I know you dont need anything.
RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by mahender on Nov 05, 2007 08:10 AM Permalink
Regarding Chinese Russian rift.This happened in late sixties.There was territorial disputes between China and Russia and chinese developed an inclination towards Americain by opening up their markets in later decades.May be an American strategy.but it went well for Russian Chineses rift.But they continued as friends and even now the same..
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 07:48 AM Permalink
Mahender, do not waste time talking to Loan Shark, he is Congress party. never going to listen truth. For him Nehru jee is the real hero not the Subhashvhndra bose, Bhagat Singh, Sardar Patel...
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by ravinandanprakash agrawal on Nov 05, 2007 08:11 AM Permalink
Hmm..mistake indeed. Still we may not know what was what. Too many things i guess. Nehru did good in my opinion. Patel couldnt do better but then he might have who knows.
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 07:35 AM Permalink
Russians and Chinese never looked eye to eye ... how could Russians consider Chinese as their brother ... Nixon built bridges with China with pakistani help to counter Soviets during the cold war.
RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 07:54 AM Permalink
LOL @ rajeev ... so you are a BJP guy ... anti-India as usual ... will appease muslims for votes, will kill Mahatma in cold blood ... you anti-national scumbags ... India knows you very well ... you cause communal divide ... cause a rift in society and then your leader from Sindh calles Jinnah a nationalist ... he is a pakistani afterall.
RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by ravinandanprakash agrawal on Nov 05, 2007 07:31 AM Permalink
Mahender. Now i am confused help me. If Patel was US like and Nehru was communist in that case Gandhiji did make a mistake. what do you think on this???
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by ravinandanprakash agrawal on Nov 05, 2007 05:46 AM Permalink
Sorry dude.I didn't get your point. Can you please simplify your thoughts? teach me like a baby. I didnt get a word on sanatan dharm.
RE:RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 06:32 AM Permalink
Hinduism is more than just sanatan dharam. What you are saying is like calling catholisism and christianity the same thing.
Arya Samajies believe in teachings Vedas, they do not believe in idol worship ... they are very much Hindus. Jains are hindus too, even though they don't beleive in sanatan dharma.
RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 06:28 AM Permalink
Most of the quote was taken from his autobiography. I tried to post that link, site is not allowing me to post it. give me ur e-mail id I will send you the link.
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Sunil Kumar on Nov 05, 2007 05:33 AM Permalink
after all how come your name is Rajeev and u carry even. that is Indian CULTURE about the view.
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 06:13 AM Permalink
Rajeev is not the foreign name. It is very much Indian name, the meaning of Rajeev is Chandrama (moon).
RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 06:55 AM Permalink
Mr. Shark, why you hide you name? Where did u learn that Rajeev is Lotus? you pakistani, always hide name and talk.
RE:RE:Fact about Mr. Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 07:12 AM Permalink
LOL ... cat calling the pot black ... a pakistani calling me a pakistani ... anyone who questions your wisdom and challenges your hate for India's leadership is automatically a pakistani ... what are you? an India hater?
India would be a better place if you India haters went to pakistan. We don't want you Jinnahs in India ... you can go to pakistan and blow yourself to pieces. LOL
RE:saiffudin
by shyamsunder on Nov 05, 2007 02:50 AM Permalink
Dear Mr. UdaySingh Choothya, Why do you want to drag gods into this forum. Talk about what is happening in the world today. Hindus don't cause any problems in the world. At least they don't bomb their migrating country after begging for migration.
@ UdaySingh Choutala , at leat Hindus have integrated well into whichever society they have migrated to and living peacefully. Hindus don't go and explode themselves in the hope of getting 72 virgins in heaven.
RE:saiffudin
by Shehroz Khan on Nov 05, 2007 03:07 AM Permalink
By the way the concept of human bomb was started by LTTE...which are hindu...if u really wanna go by religion, remember rajiv gandhi and premadasa assasination?
RE:RE:saiffudin
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 06:50 AM Permalink
Read the Kuran :
"Lo! Those who disbelieve Our revelations, We shall expose them to the Fire. As often as their skins are consumed We shall exchange them for fresh skins that they may taste the torment. Lo! Allah is ever Mighty, Wise. (56) ". Kuran Sura 4, Ayat 56.
RE:saiffudin
by Topno on Nov 05, 2007 03:26 AM Permalink
Unfortunately your religion teaches Jehad, which is not taught in any religion.
LTTE never fought for Hinduism. But if ever muslims fought for, then it is to force Islam on others (i.e. Jehad).
In Myanmar Budhist monks are fighting for Democracy. Did you ever hear that Muslim mullahs are fighting for democracy? Because Islam is against demodracy.
RE:saiffudin
by Shahana Mirza on Nov 05, 2007 04:24 AM Permalink
Saifudin, why hide behind a muslim identity. btw, fortunately Islam teaches many things that no other religion even dares to say but unfortunately you do not want to see for yourself, just pickup foul mouthed words against Islam from somewhere and use them on rediff. I am sure even after so many debates and explainations, you don't know what does jihad means.
RE:saiffudin
by raju deka on Nov 05, 2007 03:38 AM Permalink
you are sufering from XWESTRAFUCTUZHXYLISYS, a serious nervous system disorders mainly caused by close associates of PIG, DOG etc. Please take immediate medical attention, other your your death is immenent..
RE:RE:Nehru
by Lynden Christian on Nov 05, 2007 02:18 AM Permalink
Christian missionnaries started the best schools in India. The best charities were started by Christian missionnaries. India is blessed by God because of religious liberty!
RE:RE:RE:Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 05:05 AM Permalink
see the unchristian missionaries terrorism in north east. Go to stephen-knapp site, look for Christian Terrorism in Northeast India link. this reveals that how bad the Christianity is.
RE:Nehru
by true tamilan on Nov 05, 2007 04:56 AM Permalink
Biggest holocaust in ww2 was in bengal caused by your english masters. 4 million dead because of their scorch earth policy.
They did spend miniscule amount of their loot building schools and colleges which their slaves are proud of.
RE:Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 07:24 AM Permalink
there was no manipulation of Indian history ... give an example, if you want and we can talk.
Kashmir was not really a problem 80s. Nehruji died in 1964.
Tibet and China should solve their dispute on their own. India should not have to spend its resources on solving their dispute.
India is a secualr country. The right to freedom of religion is guaranteed by our constitution. Christian missionaries do a lot of good work too like supplying relief work during a natuarl disaster like earthquake and cyclone
RE:Nehru
by Jital Patel on Nov 05, 2007 02:24 AM Permalink
Nehru was nodoubt much better leader than any present leader in Indian politics right now. He didnot play any religious or caste cards like present politicians do. The negative mindset about Nehru was created in India by hindu fundamentalist organizatios like RSS and VHP. I agree that Nehru has made mistakes, but BJP and RSS have made more dangerous mistake for India. These hindu fundamentalist organizations never played any important role in independence role.
RE:Nehru
by Bibhu on Nov 05, 2007 04:29 AM Permalink
Mr J Patel....We are learned from History. If Nehru was good probaly BJP and RSS were stands better than the present form. The only person killed whole india.
RE:Nehru
by vijay ram on Nov 05, 2007 05:39 AM Permalink
If Sardar Patel were PM, there would not have been a concept of pluralism in Indian Federation. Tamil Nadu for one would have split away a long time ago. The art of accomodation advanced by Nehru worked in many places (most Indian states). The art of intimidation advanced by Patel worked in others (princely states). It is silly to suggest just one policy would have been fit for all circumstances.
RE:RE:Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 07:26 AM Permalink
Sardar Patel died in 1950 after a year in bed due to his sickness .. what would he have acieved in those 3 years as PM? and who would have been the PM after him?
Nehru at 58 was young and energetic in 1947. Sardar at 72 had health issues to deal with.
RE:Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 04:56 AM Permalink
How can we consider Nehru even as a good man? See below what he said: By education I am a Christian, by culture I am a Muslim, by coincidence I am a Hindu.
I can be called a D.nkey, but please do not call me a Hindu.
Compared to western culture & society, Indian society & culture is really low.
I am very much feared of the Sanatan (Hindu) culture & society. I always hate Sanatan dharm & society. I want to destroy Sanatan religion & society.
RE:RE:Nehru
by Jital Patel on Nov 05, 2007 05:35 AM Permalink
Rajeev, how can you consider advani or modi a good man? They are the brainchild behind the most heineous riots in India. Nehru is a history now. Modi & Advani are still present. The whole hindu-muslim tension in 90s to present started after demolition of the babri mosque. The whole world knows that who was the main architect of the babri mosque demolition?
RE:RE:RE:Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 07:31 AM Permalink
Advani is a muslim appeaser .. he plays vote politics .... after knowing that hindu votes were gransted he began licking mullah posterior. In a country that sponsors terrorism in India, he chose to call Jinnah a nationalist ... same Jinnah who caused partition of India ... yes, the BJP leader from Sindh, pakistan, called Jinnah a nationalist ... praised him, so mullah logan will vote for BJP
Such is the horror story of muslim appeasment by BJP ... and that Vajpayee rode the bus to Lahore in an effort to appease pakistanies .. only to be served with a agression in Kargil ... Vajpayee was caught dozing and India lost soldiers in that operation.
RE:Nehru
by Sriram Subramanian on Nov 05, 2007 06:05 AM Permalink
What are you talking about? Tell me exactly where you got those quotes from? Remember, Nehru was tutored by gandhi who was very religious. Also, anyone can be a good person without having to fall in love with hinduism.
RE:RE:Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 06:18 AM Permalink
Non Hindu can be a good person. But how come if a person abuse other religion can be considered a good man?
For example Mr. A.K. Antony, Abdul Kalam are good man (he is not Hindu), they do not abuse other religion.
RE:Nehru
by mahender on Nov 05, 2007 07:55 AM Permalink
My personal views: Anybody feel His religion is great;or mine is the only best is a fanatic(By definition reference Dictionary). Christian missionaries:Kudos to their human face but they spread this philosophy that their religion is the only way;which is despicable..
Some muslim fanatics also do the same.They too are hateread spreading authorities.
Definitely VHP and hindu factions do the same.They might have learnt it from Christian priests and mullas.
The problem with the two smetic religions are they are institutionalised so some priests or some maulavis can decide their social life.which is totally wrong.Theses factions sacrifice their freedom in many ways..
VHP istrying to do this institutionlisation in Hinduismwhich is gain going in the way of Christianity and Muslims..
Teaching to hate(in any form) others; like our religion is the only way; mine is the best etc are worth to be destroyed for our society to exist.
Ofcourse castism is a big tragedy in Hindu civilization.Christians and muslims have successfully destroyed this..But to avoid casteism also,never allow anybody to join hands in the name of any sect and spread hate among others..
RE:RE:Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 08:05 AM Permalink
I think I would agree with you on this. However, right to freedom of religion is guaranteed by our constitution and missionaries do a lot of good work too during national disasters. Besides, the caste system in hinduism prevents orthodox though rich upper caste hindus from helping the untouchables ... the poor/distressed lower catse guys find relief with help from missionary and so we can't blame them for embracing christianity.
you can't kick a guy, call him the lowest hindu, a social outcast, a burden on society and then curse him for accepting another religion.
RSS and Shiv Sena are doing talibanization of hinduism, which is wrong.
RE:Nehru
by abhijeet manay on Nov 05, 2007 03:50 AM Permalink
I agree. Nehru was indeed a great leader. Not a perfect one but gr8 nonetheless. He is who made the institution of democracy strong in India. We owe a lot to him
RE:Nehru
by satya pal on Nov 05, 2007 07:57 AM Permalink
any person who holds the highest post,also takes important decisions.his/her decisions may suite for the time being but not for ever.let us learn from the past and build the future.we neglected our masses.our leaders are selfish.they want to die in chair.no mla/mp/minister shall be more than 10 years in chair.let new blood come as new leader.in nature changes take place continuously.nehru family has a hold on congress party.they always want to remain in power.this bad.this is not democracy.note their qualifications.they are not interested to educate the masses.no national spirit is incalculated in them.politics is business in india.blame goes to congress which ruled this country in the long run.nehru was better leader then any one followed her.only criminals are holding the law and order in their hand.how many leaders and their kins are invoved in murders.jesica lal or nitish katara.i blame the media and masses.
RE:RE:RE:Nehru
by Loan Shark on Nov 05, 2007 07:27 AM Permalink
We owe a llot to Nehru and Gandhi ... BJP and RSS do not like Gandhiji ... In fact, RSS got Gandhiji killed in cold blood.
RE:Nehru
by abhijeet manay on Nov 05, 2007 04:19 AM Permalink
and advani, narendra modi, laloo yadav are ur examples of good leaders. Leaders like nehru and gandhi have given to India what other developing countries dont have. Political democratic institutions which are the base of a strong India.
RE:RE:Nehru
by Rajeev on Nov 05, 2007 06:22 AM Permalink
Nehru is not the real hero, the real hero was sardar Patel, Subhash Chandra Bose, Bhagat singh... we are still having problem North East, Kashmir etc... that is because of Nehru only.
