one of the WORST & PATHETIC CONGRESS goverment ever seen in Indian history. Dummy PM and hopeless Sonia.I really fed up with this congress.Dear indian people in next elections please DO NOT VOTE for congress. you can vote to any party except congress.I never seen such a stupid and unclever rule by congress. things are becoming from worse to worsen and worsen.
now guys dont jump. i know many will, who cant think beyond case,religion, region. Of the current politician i can tell he is a man of principles. If a person is good there r always people who think its weakness and try to bully. There is a word called patience. If u r surrounded by 100 corrupt gondas. if u want to do good to ur country. u have to be patient, thoughtful and careful. thats what he is.
So dont write crap, i can bet if u were in his position , u wouldnt hesitate to sell the country....
RE:Manmohan Ji u r a man of integrity
by Sastry on Jun 20, 2008 10:29 PM Permalink
His only ve qualification is just being absolutely loyal to Her Majesty's Voice. The next best part of his tenure for the rabid minorities is his penchant to implement "Minority First" principle.
RE:Manmohan Ji u r a man of integrity
by Bharat Kr on Jun 20, 2008 10:18 PM Permalink
Do you understand the word principles? Surely not. That man cheated President Kalam to dissolve Bihar assembly. That man allowed an affidavit to be filed in the Supreme Court denouncing Sri Ram's existence, and declaring Ramayan is a fiction. Wake up and try to see the truth. Manmohan-congress govt is a disaster for the nation.
RE:Manmohan Ji u r a man of integrity
by desi on Jun 20, 2008 10:26 PM Permalink
u r talking about govt. I am talking about individual. Know the difference.btw PM alone cant decide about Kalam sir. He is trying in his best capacity being surround by unethical , selfish politician to maintain his integrity. I can say, if it would have been any other person, they would comprise and become part of the system(corrupt)
It is an ideal choice for a person of his stature. The left are not in favor of Indo-U.S.A nuclear deal & are adamant on their stand. The UPA lead union Govt.headed by Dr.Singh wants to push the deal. Left are supporting constituent of UPA Govt. though they are not in the Union Cabinet. Now, under these circumstances, it depends solely on wisdom of the Prime Minister Dr.Singh what he proposes that will be an ideal choice.
Most sincere PM Mr MMS, Go ahead. The whole nation .i.e. nationalists are firmly behind you. BJP must understand taht Nuclear deal is to resolve enrgy dependence oi oilrich countries, hence in retaining our independencefor ever.BJP must act in national interest and support PM in his sincere efforts to save India from energy crisis.
RE:Go ahead
by Sunil Chaturvedi on Jun 20, 2008 09:31 PM Permalink
Why do u talk like a fool.Don't u realise that self-interests always override social interests for most politicians.BJP is desperately waiting for the current government to fall.
RE:Go ahead
by rani suri on Jun 20, 2008 09:55 PM Permalink
The Congress should have taken the BJP into confidence right from the beginning but they thought they could do it on their own!! For all matters relating to the nations interest, BJP support is important.
RE:Go ahead
by mahesh chander gupta on Jun 20, 2008 09:37 PM Permalink
Please do not usesuch lanaguage. I am only talking of national interest before every thing. Am I wrong?
Thanks a ton Sheela Bhatt. Just one article from you would save many a reader issues of various newspapers, journals and hours on TV babble. Pls. keep writing more often. After your last article on Karnataka elections I've been wondering how to contact you and also retrieve a printout from rediff. Could you pls send me yr email or at least a copy of the article? Thanks & Rgds. Rajen Girglani
RE:He has two choices..
by Malamaalweekly on Jun 20, 2008 09:26 PM Permalink
PM is not going to resign. This is all drama played by congress, Sonia, and Manmohan. Afterall Manmohan is also another politician like Sonia, Lalu etc. who does not have any self-respect, can stoop to any level to stay in power. Mera Desh Mahan.
I have earlier also shared my views on the Nuclear Deal.No Doubt any self made man would like to quit if people dont understand the basics of the International Politics.Indian communists are the biggest anti national elements today.This deal will proove to be blessing in disguise for the country if agreed.China has stolen Tibet from India and many strategic regions in the whole of Northern Sector.And still they want many more regions from the control of India if necessary by force.I can predict that China will never feel shy of repeating history of 1962.China had been always been misguiding Pakistan to wage wars against India.Because they are against a strong neighbour.It is simple Chankya Niti...!I again repeat if we dont sign on the dotted line immediately then our future generations will never forgive us. As far as Modern International Politics is concerned,it is well known that if things don't turn out in the interest of the the country then we can always ignore the agreement.After all in a Democracy interest of the people and the country is always foremost.Didn't America wage a war in Iraq on the false premise of safegauding the interest of its territories from the so called WMD weapons which were never there.Well my dear Cmmunist fellows hasn't your China cunningly embraced America for spicing Industrial Revelotion in that country.In just twenty years they have left India behind in all sectors.Mr.Karat be wiser if you want to be respected by your own grandchildren...!
RE:PM wants to quit over nuclear deal
by Anand YNI on Jun 20, 2008 10:40 PM Permalink
Hi Inder,
I request you to read the complete text of the 123 Nuclear Deal & the Hyde Act, & the related expert Comments by the former Chairpersons of Atomic Energy Commission & Mr Bramha Chellaney, before actually posting the comment. Everything is available on the internet. All that you need to do is to type "123 Nuclear Deal" or "Text of Hyde Act" on the Google Search.
Alternatively, you may send your e mail ID to me at yni.anand@rediffmail.com or post here to enable me to send the same to you from my PC.
The inflation is so high (crossing 11%) and Oil prices beyond control, Cong doesn't have any issue left to fight in next assembly election. So they now grabing the only issue left with them the Nuclear deal. It is clear that even if they proceed from now it is not sure the same will be honoured in the US assembly as it will be dissolve within a month or two for a fresh mandate. The new Govt. will begin afresh about the whole deal. SO FREINDS IT IS ELECTION and PM's ADAMENT nothing more. Not for the sake of Country's common man.
One hopes that Manmohan Singh makes good on his threat, so-called, to resign. The country can do without unelected American agents like him. In any case, if Singh and his backers in the media are so adamant on the Nuclear Deal going through, they should answer some questions: Why, if the US gets nothing from this deal, is Bush exerting so much pressure for it to be concluded? Remember the USS Trenton/INS Jalashwa episode? What hidden protocols lie behind this Nuclear Deal? If the idea of the Nuclear Deal is to prop India up against China, can one actually think of a situation where the US takes on China? Even if it won, its own economy would be destroyed utterly. At the most it may use India as a proxy, which means India will be destroyed instead. The Chinese are and will remain our neighbours. We can't escape to the other side of the planet from them. Or do the pro-US media think the US will allow the entire Indian population to emigrate to Texas or California? Why should we sign a deal with a discredited US president and make ourselves willing allies of a man his own people hate? Both McCain and Obama are promising a new anti-Bush USA. Why has the US - if the Nuclear Deal is so important because Nuclear energy is the energy of the future - not built any new nuclear plants in the last thirty years? Why is it now seeking to destroy Alaska by drilling for oil in wildlife reserves? Manmohan Singh must answer some of these questions.
RE:Some questions
by S Narain on Jun 20, 2008 09:11 PM Permalink
U R chinese agent & US hater,however please do not make petty comments,, even the great missile man and our most respected Ex President Dr Kalam also is in favour of the nuclear agreement!! Bewkoof!!
RE:RE:Some questions
by Biswapriya Purkayastha on Jun 20, 2008 09:28 PM Permalink
Same Kalam who signed the Bihar govt dismissal and who now wants a plane for his private use provided out of Indian govt funds?
RE:Some questions
by satya prakash singh on Jun 20, 2008 10:28 PM Permalink
HEY U ANTINATIONAL! DON'T YOU DARE DOUBT WISDOM OF Dr. KALAM. YOU MUST KNOW THAT IN OUR CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM, PRESIDENT IS MERE RUBBER STAMP. IF THE SAME PROPOSAL IS SENT TO HIM AGAIN BY THE ACTING GOVT., HE IS DUTY-BOUND TO APPROVE IT.AND IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THE GOVT. MIGHT HAVE GIVEN HIM CRORES & CRORES WITHOUT ACCOUNTABILITY. WANT TO HAVE A SIMILAR EXAMPLE? A. Q. KHAN OF PAKISTAN. SO, DON'T YOU DARE, YOU COMMIE.
RE:Some questions
by S Narain on Jun 20, 2008 09:13 PM Permalink
Yechury & Karat like traitors should be made naked & exposed of their evil design
Pakistan is going ahead with nuclear deal with China for their Kahuta plant...the emnemies of India & base for terrorism in the world..
This deal of paki is never opposed by Karat & co... in fact they support the deal as they are traitors..
Yechury & Karat never won even a municipal election and plotted to throw out the vetran leader Jyoti Basu from Politbureau of CPM ..
These fellows have befooled the gullible Bongs & showed finger like Greg Chappel to Somnath Da when he wanted to contest vice President post...CPM is power by Bengal but all plum position are hijacked by rootless fellows like Yechury & Karat...
What a great fooling to bongs !!!!the so called intellectuals
Wake up India& wake up bengal before it is too late ,,
RE:RE:Some questions
by Biswapriya Purkayastha on Jun 20, 2008 09:34 PM Permalink
Exactly which election has the Chair Warmer, Manmohan Singh, won? He dare not even stand for election to the Rajya Sabha from his own state. Coward.
RE:Some questions
by Sandhya on Jun 20, 2008 10:05 PM Permalink
China never had border with India it got it by annexing Tibet. Bengalis are the Biggest anti nationalists to be keeping communists alive in India. It is only because of Bengalis that we have an Anti nationalist Party playing a Major Role in Indian Policy making. Chinese have signed Nuclear Deal but they are Pushing their Indian Puppets to sabotage the same for Indians The centre can't have a Position against Chinese on its atrocities on a Pieceful tibetan Civilization only because it won't please the Communists. Chinese communists are nationalists as they want to expand and Control large part of India for their motherland ,but Indian Communists are imbeciles who won't mind selling their motherland to Chinese master. Indian Communists are just like slaves of Dracula,who can offer their mothers blood to feed their master
Bengalis can have a bengali Regional Party but atleast they can keep these puppets of Chinese out of Indian Politics If bengalis don't understand this than they too are anti nationals.
RE:Some questions
by Shahid Hashmi on Jun 20, 2008 09:28 PM Permalink
I agree with Mr.Biswapriya,Mr.Manmohan Singh Should resign and be practical instead of circulating propaganda of his resignation.The deal was signed at Hyderabad between him and President Bush without any serious consideration,in a haste.It is not in the interest of our nation.The Congress party's remote cotrol is in the hands of cunny and unreliable Bush. Shahid hashmi Aligarh,U.P.
RE:Some questions
by AMIT PAUL on Jun 20, 2008 10:04 PM Permalink
Friends do not fight with this type of crazy bengali woman. This type of useless bengalis brought communist in power, consequently bengal has been already destroyed and now they are trying to destroy rest of india. For information, I am a bengali too but I hate communists.
RE:Some questions
by arun lal on Jun 20, 2008 09:08 PM Permalink
arent u concerned about our energy resourses at all bengali...how long can we depend on middleeast oil....to get the clearence from iaea we need american suppport....only then can we sign deals with french or russia as u guys want to.isnt it rather simple.....and for all ur anti us,pro china dialogue remember 1962
RE:Some questions
by Biswapriya Purkayastha on Jun 20, 2008 09:27 PM Permalink
"arent u concerned about our energy resourses at all bengali..." How about using the resources we have for once? How about cutting down on wastage and power theft (40% of the total according to the power companies)? How about mining the uranium we have in this country, which is lying untapped, as in Meghalaya? "how long can we depend on middleeast oil...." How about promoting wind and hydel power? How about substituting jatropha plantations? How about going ahead with the Iran pipeline deal? If it had been not shelved (under US pressure) our natural gas problems at least would have been solved by now. "to get the clearence from iaea we need american suppport....only then can we sign deals with french or russia as u guys want to." Have you checked out the latest responses from other countries? Of the NSG, Australia and South Africa are against us, and will block supplies if we don't sign the NPT. Or aren't you aware of that? How much credibility has the US got in the world now? Not very much. "isnt it rather simple.....and for all ur anti us,pro china dialogue remember 1962" Read a book called "India's China War" by Neville Maxwell - gives you information, drawn from the Henderson-Brookes report, about what actually happened in 1962. Published in India. If that is you know how to read. I doubt it from your spelling and diction.
RE:Some questions
by Cool Customer on Jun 20, 2008 11:47 PM Permalink
Biswapriya You are debating about issues that have been debated numerous times. Let me try a short and sweet version.
A. The US wants this deal because it provides enromous economic leverage into India besides controlling a crucial backbone of India- The energy. Is that risky? Yes. Is it a national compromise. No! Why? I will explain...
B. What about Iran Oil or Uranium (BTW we have rich Thorium reserves not Uranium. If we had Uranium, we wouldnt be desperate) mining and or alternative resources of energy? These question underline the theoritical supposition. A potential is not equivalent to a solution. We have a potential for a trillion dollar economy- doent make us one. Similarly, all these solutions require technological solutions, everyone one of which is going to take 10-25 years (nevermind the challenge and reliance of knowledge import. Can we invent our way through? Nothing in histroy provides evidence ,we can do that). So what happens during those 25 years, who provides the moeny to import and develop those expensive state of art technology? The challenge is current. How to sustain an economic growth in the next 10 years. None of the solutions you mentioned are capable of doing that.
RE:RE:Some questions
by Cool Customer on Jun 20, 2008 11:54 PM Permalink
Contd.... C. Nuclear technolgy is something that we have indgeneously developed substantially. Specially the thorium reactors. But for it to be commercially viable, we are still 10 years away. Also the main challenge remains the use of uranium to kickstart the process. Hence we need the uranium. Nuclear power can be commissioned quickly without relying heavily on technology import, even though some critical reprocessing technology is being imported. Thus we can sustain interim growth and divert some funds to R&D and alternative energy on the long run.
And now finally, is this deal a compromise of our national integrity.
I think this is one the smartest deal India has made internationally in recent years. It has negotiated toughly and had leveraged our economic potential well to gain lot of concessions.
But Alas! Thanks to the left, we are in a different situtaion now. If we go back to revive the deal, it may have been too late to have that leverage. And besides we have shown the world that we are unreliable when it comes to courage and the decision to proceed with unchartered territory. there are too many chicken littles crying the sky will fall on our heads. And we lost an oppurtunity in history to something special. we will grow, but we will need more than a miracle to be special. oppurtunity does not knock twice- Usually.
