Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Message deleted by moderator.    Hide replies
  RE:Time will prove it all..
by sanjay on Jul 24, 2008 02:29 PM   Permalink
tell us why the hurry in nuclear deal when it just gives us 3% more energy after 20 years. why cant UPA let the public know about the cost of the electricity ( some say it will be 17 Rs per unit ) and the investment ( estimates 19,00, 000 Crores) which will go in.

i sincerely believe there is more to the deal that is the reason bush,Sonia Gandhi( Bofors Scam), laloo (Fodder scam) Mulayam ( Reliance janta Party ) is in a hurry to get the deal done.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Time will prove it all..
by Gumpy on Jul 24, 2008 02:32 PM   Permalink
Please get your facts right. Have u even read the neuclear deal draft ??

The cost of neuclear power generated is marginally higher than that fm coal (Rs 4.5 vs. Rs 3.5)..but coal will stay only for another 40 years or so..So, what will you leave for your children..?? DRAKNESS ??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:Time will prove it all..
by Gumpy on Jul 24, 2008 02:32 PM   Permalink
sorry, DARKNESS..!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Time will prove it all..
by anil mahajan on Jul 24, 2008 03:12 PM   Permalink
Mr Gumpy,
There is no doubt that Nuclear power is a long lasting solution then thermal power but Hydel Power is a much better and practically ever lasting solution. But we should not forget the risks involved in generating nuclear power, disposal of waste and continous supply. Any misadventure by any mad nation can cripple our raw material supplies without any fault on our part. We should not forget what happened in Bhopal gas leak case. Nuclear mishap is going to be thousands of times more dangerous.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Time will prove it all..
by Gumpy on Jul 24, 2008 02:30 PM   Permalink
very well written. Most of us writing here on rediff are the ones enjoying Manmohan Singh's eocnomic reforms in 1992 and getting access to the world thru better jobs and opportunities...

Lets have a thing Gratitude, which moist of us dont have, it seems..!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Time will prove it all..
by Ashok Gobindram Lulla on Jul 24, 2008 03:45 PM   Permalink
      RE:Time will prove it all..
by Ashok Gobindram Lulla on Jul 24, 2008 03:38 PM
"Manmohan Singh started Indian economic reforms...? Are you sure of your facts?
His boss that time was Mr. P V Narasimha Rao.
Barring Babri Masjid debacle, he was the true architect of those reforms. This was the man who had a shrewd undderstanding of the nation's needs, and despite a slim 'manufactured' majority, he ran the country well. He was an administrator in the Chanakya mould. He could have chosen to make Dr Manmohan Singh a 'darbari' the way Sonia Gandhi did; but he did not. Dr. Manmohan Singh did not have, and still does not have any vision about India. As for his being 'honest, upright, man of integrity' and all those shibboleths, we have all seen a display of his integrity and Congress values in the Trust vote.

Incidentally, Mr. Narasimha Rao represents only the non-Family member of the Congress to have
completed a full 5-year tenure as Prime Minister. A fact that has stuck in the throat of
the Signora Sonia Gandhi, nee Maino. When he died, the Congress, under instructions of this family, hustled his body out of Delhi and hastily cremated it, so that a memorial to Narasimha Rao could not be erected. Had his body
been kept in state, for a few days, then a public demand would gone out that he was a worthy son of India, who merited a memorial. The
(naqli) Gandhis believes it is solely the pre- rogative of the Gandhis to have memorials of their kith and kin in Delhi. Imagine the irony,
a C

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Time will prove it all..
by Ashok Gobindram Lulla on Jul 24, 2008 03:38 PM   Permalink
"Manmohan Singh started Indian economic reforms...? Are you sure of your facts?
His boss that time was Mr. P V Narasimha Rao.
Barring Babri Masjid debacle, he was the true architect of those reforms. This was the man who had a shrewd undderstanding of the nation's needs, and despite a slim 'manufactured' majority, he ran the country well. He was an administrator in the Chanakya mould. He could have chosen to make Dr Manmohan Singh a 'darbari' the way Sonia Gandhi did; but he did not. Dr. Manmohan Singh did not have, and still does not have any vision about India. As for his being 'honest, upright, man of integrity' and all those shibboleths, we have all seen a display of his integrity and Congress values in the Trust vote.

Incidentally, Mr. Narasimha Rao represents only the non-Family member of the Congress to have
completed a full 5-year tenure as Prime Minister. A fact that has stuck in the throat of
the Signora Sonia Gandhi, nee Maino. When he died, the Congress, under instructions of this family, hustled his body out of Delhi and hastily cremated it, so that a memorial to Narasimha Rao could not be erected. Had his body
been kept in state, for a few days, then a public demand would gone out that he was a worthy son of India, who merited a memorial. The
(naqli) Gandhis believes it is solely the pre- rogative of the Gandhis to have memorials of their kith and kin in Delhi. Imagine the irony,
a Charan Singh gets a samadhi in his memory. But not a full-term CONGRESS PM.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Time will prove it all..
by subir sengupta on Jul 24, 2008 02:48 PM   Permalink
Kajolika, there is no doubt about the economic reform started by the then finance minister Manmohan Singh, that does not mean that his keen interest in the nuclear deal is a correct move. There are a few nuclear expert (Ex-BARC) who openly expressed their apprehension about this deal. Moreover the exhorbitant cost involves to increse appx. 4 to 6 percent energy is a blunder, I believe. Our politicians play games as per their convenience in life. India is bound to have problems from this deal. The simple reason is that, we will be completely dependent on the suppliers of nuclear fuels like uranium and there they will dictate terms to us. You might say we also import a bulk need oil for our domestic need. True, but in this case if any country refuses to supply the same, we shall only have to curtail our use. In nuclear energy, we need to invest huge in the infrastructure that will not only go waste, the burden of this huge loss would go to the common man.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Time will prove it all..
by Rajesh Jadhav on Jul 24, 2008 03:00 PM   Permalink
What about the opinion of Lgendary Scientist Mr. APJ Abdul Kalam? He also supported N-Deal.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Time will prove it all..
by sanjay Mor on Jul 24, 2008 03:59 PM   Permalink
You are thinking too much for future, till that time we will have our own technology

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Dr Singh meets Somnath Chatterjee