Me Highness is also incarnate of Buddha as certified by Chinese authorities. More Lordship incarnate certifications are to be issued to me.
Me Highness, support UPA govt for the excellent economic growth of India, especially Sonia Gandhiji, Manmohan Singhji and Montek Ahluwalia saab. Me Highnes have blessed them.
Me Highness wish them more success and absolute majority in next elections, Me Highness pray to GOD, so as save myself from bhikari times and avoid visiting Dhaka, Khatmandu, Male, Yangon, Thimpu, Ndajamena for aid.
RE:Bless you
by rajesh on Sep 14, 2007 05:14 PM Permalink
Your Highness, I have booked a room for you at the best of the mental hospitals in our country. Please walk-in...
1. There was a beef eating BRAHMIN called Jawaher Lal Neharu
2. His daughter Indira Priyadarshini got married with a PARSI journalist
3. She wore two son from that PARSI husband (as popularly believed)namely Rajiv and Sanjay
4. After demise of Firoz Gandhi ( the Parsi journalist), Indira and Rajiv informed the Supreme Court that they were HINDU
5. RAJIV got married with a ROMAN CATHOLIC lady called Sonia and she gave the birth to two children namely Prianka and Rahul
6. Priyanka got married to a gentleman named Robert Vadhera, whose mother was a Christian and father was a PUNJABI ( HINDU/ SARDAR / Converted Chistian not known)
By now you must be REALLY confused that what is the religion of this family..............so are they themselve along with their respective CHAMCHAs
RE:The religious history of Neharu Clan
by Anurag Shrivastava on Sep 14, 2007 04:12 PM Permalink
so what is your point you small town narrow minded cockroach ??
RE:The religious history of Neharu Clan
by Anurag Shrivastava on Sep 14, 2007 04:18 PM Permalink
good one buddy. so you are a small town narrow minded cockroach - that seems to have got proved. Never mind your thoughts about my dwelling
RE:The religious history of Neharu Clan
by Anurag Shrivastava on Sep 14, 2007 04:32 PM Permalink
Like I told you are cockroach - always worried bout how someone's a@@ tastes. In any case you are a small town guy and have no class.
RE:The religious history of Neharu Clan
by ahmed kasim on Sep 14, 2007 04:14 PM Permalink
they dont belive in religion, but they play with religion. making people fools.
"The government has total respect for all religions, and Hinduism in particular....". This statement of the Govt sounds so hollow that even the Govt may find it difficult to accept. The UPA is only sensitive to the issues pertaining to minorities. Where it concerns the Hindus, they are not.
The ASG has stated that they are going ahead with the dredging in areas excluding the Ram Sethu. This does not sound right. What if the SC bars the dredging of the Ram Sethu at a later date, in which case the project may have to be abandoned? Will it not mean a loss of Tax-payers' money? Or is it the confidence of the UPA that they will only get a favourable judgement from the SC?
People have mentioned Christ and Mohammed. Well, they were historical characters, just like Buddha and Mahavira, but all myths circulating about them are not historically true. You don%u2019t have to believe the jataka tales literally to be a god Buddhist. And if I believed that there was actually some one called Hanuman who could jump across the Pak straits i would need to get my head examined, right? 5. Some have also mentioned about the Delhi Metro route being skirted round the Kutab Minar. So what? Kutab Minar is a historically documented heritage site. Actually just a handful of Hindus knew of Ramsetu until the NASA photo came along. So it is not even a venerated Hindu place of faith. It is the BJP which is raising the issue for political one-up-man-ship, even though it is the NDA government that had initiated the Ram Setu Project.
RE:Myths and History
by arungopal agarwal on Sep 14, 2007 04:18 PM Permalink
Religion from politics is out from India due to democratic secular set up only,there is nothing wrong if BJP has a little bending towards Hindus,as all other parties have also bending/apeasing policies for others. However I agree that we must think scientifically in the interest of nation instead of fanatic way.
RE:Myths and History
by Sivadas Muringasseril on Sep 14, 2007 04:15 PM Permalink
Are..Ulta Mohanty.. Whoever knew about Ram and Ramayana knew he gone to Lanka through the bridge constructed by his Vanara Sena. Its all belief....by the way you believe one Mohanty is your father.. is it not only a belief.. that your mother told you.
BJP is a party that does not exist anymore. It has eroded and disintegrate. It is full of old, rotten, dumb, senile, backward thinking fools who can only contest an election using the naivete of ppl, by taking out cheap Rath Yatras, and playing the Ram sentriment. No agenda. No development activity. Just religion. Advani is as old as the hills, and he kneels down in Pakistan and apologises for Babri issue. He loves Jinnah and calls him a patriot. Vajapayee is also as old as the hills, if not older. An alcoholic who cannot walk the distance from the drawing room to his bathroom. And we want these ppl to lead India? Congress is a forward thinking party. Look at how dynamic they are. Nuclear deal, SethuSamudram etc are all development activities which will oput India on the path of progress. So decide who you want, my friends.
RE:Budda Jaaaarina Party
by ILovehindustan on Sep 14, 2007 04:08 PM Permalink
Daring steps:-reservation for minorities. hurting hindus. all the govt aids will be given to minorities first. releasing all the terrorists. giving rations to illeagal bangladeshis. is this what u call taking india forward, shame on you
RE:Budda Jaaaarina Party
by Madurai Sundaresan SatheeshKumar on Sep 14, 2007 04:15 PM Permalink
Dear friend The nuke deal was done when BJP was in power.I dont mind that you dont like BJP, but congress is actually the party which is rotten...with its age old way of doing things!
The 'dynamic' congress party's Home minister says that 'the terrorist activities were there even with a tougher law like POTA.Hence no need of such laws.'
So he mean to say that if a tough law is not effective, then better drop that. As we have cases of murder,robbery,terrorist violence etc, and since existing laws are ineffective, we can drop all of them!...What a logic our Home minister ( of your esteemed congress party)has given...
If a law is not effective, then you have to enact tougher ones to take care. But our age old party has a older mind set that do that...
RE:Budda Jaaaarina Party
by Anupam Srivastava on Sep 14, 2007 04:27 PM Permalink
Shame on U Shridhar and ur dirty knowledge people like u are actually rottenning india , idiots , people like u see every thing from a politicial angle and keep narrow view, had it been a small masjid in the way of setu samudram project the government would not have taken a single minute to abandon the project, man if u have some shame then come out of slumber and see what u r going to loose after the demolition of Adams bridge , u know its that structure which saves u from tsunamis and other sea tornedo's dont go for politics see ur benefits. abuse hindus and get the votes of muslims is a dangerous trend emerging in our country and people like u abuse hindus to prove that they are secular. but u all are idiots because u will only break the country with ur idiotic phrases becasue a day will come when these politicians will take our country to another division as they have done in 1947 and again they will change the history to prove that hindus are wrong and their voters were kind to demand a seperate homeland.
RE:Budda Jaaaarina Party
by avinash b on Sep 14, 2007 04:30 PM Permalink
pl. do not show ur intelligence in abusing politicians..we need to look into the acts of government and our heritage that is not taken seriously and ..the very basic need is to stop this false notion that if we will not destroy our heritage we will not develop.....pl. be proud of what we all got as heritage and learn from the good ideals that is ram even if it is imaginary.....we can not proclaim that the ram ....an ideal purushottam man till date is negated and abused like this and his character killed by saying it as false mythology.....what impression the little children will get from these comments and what about the beleivers of ram since centuries...which no one in this earth can count......not even gandhi,jawahar and king george of england.
one should have the little sence of knowing what he is babbling and showing his mental state by these comments..
So many GODS..."Millions of them" worships ranging from moon, sun, earth, plants, animals, rotting rivers, mountains, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc..Male genitalia (Lingum)
Many in South admire Ravana, but in North perceived as Demon, beliefs vary from state to state, different clans, etc etc and as somebody said earlier in the debate, "Monkeys building bridges"
This is all so very confusing. Really wonder what is the truth and how the intellects amongst us approach this..???
RE:Could there be some truth in it ????????
by avinash b on Sep 14, 2007 04:36 PM Permalink
you are intellictually a proven fool....and confused ...ask from ur mother to teach u some sence or get u to a doctor..otherwise she will have to hear some day her children are saying prove that i am born from her womb.....
get some sences soon and don't put urself so dangereously before others that u r such stupid and bring pety on ur genes and forefathers..
RE:Could there be some truth in it ????????
by avinash sharma on Sep 14, 2007 04:12 PM Permalink
see mindless, u are what ur name suggests. none of these gods are child rapists! none raped a nine year old girl. so good?
RE:Could there be some truth in it ????????
by Imran on Sep 14, 2007 04:11 PM Permalink
There is no truth in any of the age old beliefs. God lies only in the imagination of weak people. Relgion is man made even if God existed he would have made a better relgion than what religions exist today.
RE:Could there be some truth in it ????????
by Madurai SatheeshKumar on Sep 14, 2007 04:20 PM Permalink
Friend, Just be intelligent to be aware of the fact that the events you have mentioned are dating back to over around 10 lakh years...There could have been a kind of race which is between monkeys and humans.I am not saying this is the way, but could have been the case.
So have an open mind, as no one can intellectually understand these things, particularly when the events are supposed to have happened ages before...
For that matter, its the same with any religeous events. You just will not be able to find any logic in that with our knowledge derived from present...
1. If the affidavit says that there is no historical evidence that Ram existed I don't think Hindus should get offended. Just as if someone says thee is no historical evidence that Adam existed, or that Moses parted the Red Sea, no Christian need get offended. These are maters of faith. But The ASI can say or any international scientific body can say that there is no historical evidence of it, they would be perfectly justified. In fact if they are doing there job right they must assert the truth, ASI is not thee to respect faiths.
2. But there was no need to put the line in the affidavit, because the issue was not whether Ram existed, but whether Ram Setu was manmade. And thee is no scientific evidence to show that it is man made.
1. Just because images of Ram, Sita and Hanuman are thee in the constitution and just because Gandhi talked of Ramrajya does not mean that Ram existed historically. An idealized fictional character or a myth can be very well be a source of inspiration.
3. We Hindus are not as dumb as the Bible belt Christians who believe that the Bible is literally true and the world was created in 7 days and so on. We can believe in Ram, Krishna, Parsuram and the thirty-three crore gods, but are not stupid enough to think that they literally existed in a historical context. WE have more power of imagination than that.
4. People have mentioned Christ and Mohammed. Well, they were historical characters, just like Buddha and Mahavira, but all myths circulating a
RE:HIndus are wiser
by avinash b on Sep 14, 2007 04:41 PM Permalink
who can claim the works of ram..the ASI is very small to talk and interpret the philosophy of hindu religion.god made things are not man made as he is not a man....better correct and do not say the things that are beyond the interpretation of science...and make 100 % sure while saying the abiguous words .....
RE:RE:HIndus are wiser
by shrikant kale on Sep 14, 2007 04:19 PM Permalink
Mr Mohanti, tell me one thing why for centuries together croes of people in this country are celebrating the birthdates/tithi ? It is logical to think that corees of people for generations together would celebrate imaginary birth dates of imaginary characters in imaginary epic ? Has it happend anywhere in the world ? be logical,,ramayan is a hitorical epic.
RE:HIndus are wiser
by Utkal Mohanty on Sep 14, 2007 04:49 PM Permalink
People celebrate Santoshi Brata, so Santoshi maa is a historical character is it? What is wrong with celebrating the birthday of an imaginary character if that imaginary character embodies certain ideals and lives in the hearts of peole as a real character?
RE:RE:RE:HIndus are wiser
by Utkal Mohanty on Sep 14, 2007 04:55 PM Permalink
Everywhere in the world people worship imaginary gods, dream of imaginary heaven and hell, what;s so surprising about it. In the words of Ghalib: Humko malum hai zannat ki haqueeqat, lekin dil ko khush rakhne ke liye khayal achha hai. Bilions believe in Zannat and hundreds blow themselves up believing that they will go to heaven. That does not mean heaven with beautiful houries and cool fountains exist. Belief and faith has nothing to do with truth.
RE:The religious history of Nehru clan
by Sridhar Jajula on Sep 14, 2007 04:07 PM Permalink
So? Big dea. Shed ur fanaticism for your religion, which itself has no head or tail.
RE:The religious history of Nehru clan
by Anurag Shrivastava on Sep 14, 2007 04:08 PM Permalink
Kashmiri Brahmins eat beef and so do Bengali ones. India is a diverse country and every community has its own eating and living habit. 65% of all Hindus are non-vegetarians ; 85% of Tamil Hindus are non-vegetarians. Vegetarianism is a function of geography - people eat what is in plenty and preserve what is there needed in famine.
RE:The religious history of Nehru clan
by ahmed kasim on Sep 14, 2007 04:18 PM Permalink
vegterian has derived from the greek word vegteria means raw food, those who are having raw food like fruits, vegtables(not boiled) are called vegterian.
How can government withdraw affidavit submitted judicial system. If they can withdraw, does this mean that government had submitted false affidavit ? If yes, then shall we believe in this FALSE government? Why anyone should not file PIL(Public Interest Litigation) against this ? I hope, if any of the courtier reads this, he/she might feel to file the same.
When there was a cartoon depicting insult to Prophet Mohammed, there was fire all over the world , which spread even in india. But when the hindus are being insulted we find only few political party linked people out to question.I dont think political party people have a genuine interest, but what about the common people? Most of the hindus dont care and if they find other hindus protesting , they would be first ones to address protestors as Hindu Fundamentalists!
India is one among those who banned Salman Rushdie's "Satanic verses" but when it came to hindu beliefs and culture they would publish anything.
I believe this is a crucial issue, if we respond the right way some people desired this would set a fire of hate , but if we also keep quiet it will be definitely taken to the next level testing patience of hindus every ther time.
The safest remedy is I hate to say this, but the bloody government has to be brought down to send a message that no one would rule if the traditions are questioned, in that way no riots/protests to gather will be required.
I would never recommend BJP to be the ruling party but at the same time they wouldnt have stood a spectator to all this if they did rule!
