That's what sikhs have always been saying...."If a sikh takes upto arms to defend his faith he is labelled as Sikh terrorist else sikhs are called as hindus.Why don't they call them as Hindu terrorist if sikhs and hindus are same". When we revolt we are Sikhs when we remain silent we are Hindus
RE:Sikh or Hindu militant
by deepak on Dec 31, 2007 09:48 PM Permalink
dont worry about what others say?? what do you wanna be? Hindu is a very wide and expansive term. Its like a brand name for all streams of Hinduism...Hindus would want to consider Sikhism, Buddhism, Jainism, Brahmo, Arya all under the tent of Hinduism- its a harmless and unifying concept. Furthermore, Hinduism doesnt have a fatwa issuing Vatican body, so Sikhs & others are pretty independent. BTW isnt it odd that Sikhs should take help of Pakistanis wherefrom they were kicked out lock stock and barrel?? if there is a Khalistan, it should be in West Punjab with Lahore as its capital.
RE:Sikh or Hindu militant
by Jitendra Kumar on Dec 31, 2007 11:22 PM Permalink
Hey ISI agent you got better job in pakistan only. Why is it burning without your help? What is musharraf's next plan? Nawaz sharif will be killed after election or before? What will happen if Hillary win the USA president election. Who will pay your salary if pakistan divided into 3 parts ?????????
RE:Sikh or Hindu militant
by Goldy on Jan 01, 2008 05:31 AM Permalink
That means you dont count Sikhs as Indians. Ironically Hindus in this country are the biggest traitor. Nobody can match the sacrifices made by people like Bhagat Singh and Udham Singh. But still Sikhs are considered as traitors. Sikhs dont need a certificate from anyone.
RE:Sikh or Hindu militant
by Jitendra Kumar on Dec 31, 2007 11:08 PM Permalink
You are liar for sure. You are expert in instigating one community to other and such expertise can be imported from one country only that is pakistan. You have opened your mouth so wide that internal secrets have came out. Kindly look at your country pakistan it is burning , you do not need IB ,Modi or CIA to disintegrate. It will be done by your brothers only, so put your best effort to keep it united instead of working as a match box
RE:Sikh or Hindu militant
by on Jan 01, 2008 12:19 AM Permalink
Why do you think Im an ISI agent when I say Sikhs are not Hindus and will never be? Our struggle from 1978 to the present day is for this only.
This is very funny.
As regards events in Pakistan Im not interested in them.
Benazir along with Rajiv Gandhi were responsible for killing many Sikhs.
As I said you reap what you sow .
But still as a human being Im not happy at Benazir's assasination.
RE:Sikh or Hindu militant
by Lal Popat on Jan 01, 2008 05:52 AM Permalink
Hinduism indeed is not Sikhism. In fact Hindu is an umbrella word given by the Arabs to pagan worshipers and their million gods across Sindhu river.
It is only during the Bhakti movement that Ram and Krishna became mainstream gods. In ancient India Shiva and Buddhism/Jainism were more popular.
