Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 222 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:tvr SHENOY IS A BRAHMIN RSS SCUM
by jack back on May 09, 2008 11:07 PM  Permalink
I don't know what age & time you are living in.Do you still prefer to label people by caste? If caste was a major factor in a person's personality Dr. Ambedkar would not have been able to do what he did.He did give a stable constitution, unfortunately Nehruvians distorted it.

Why can't we discuss the point of argument instead of looking thru the filter of race,religion,region or caste?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:tvr SHENOY IS A BRAHMIN RSS SCUM
by Vijay B on May 09, 2008 11:25 PM  Permalink

This san man is a f ing Islam fundamentalist. Unfortunately he has no balls for us to kick.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:tvr SHENOY IS A BRAHMIN RSS SCUM
by san man on May 09, 2008 11:41 PM  Permalink
this vijay is a bas...tard who brahmin mom got fu*cked by karuna

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Shaka-Pramukh
by on May 09, 2008 10:52 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

TVR - Keep the good work. Sounds like pep-talk at Shakha is working too good on you!

Please plan to meet to discuss new propoganda this sunday at Shakha.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Shaka-Pramukh
by on May 09, 2008 11:03 PM  Permalink
Hey Shakha Pramukh....This is a national issue and a national forum....Regional Parties are not permitted here...
Stop sulling the name of good Hindu political parties....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Shaka-Pramukh
by Sahadevan KK on May 10, 2008 01:49 PM  Permalink
Intelligence in voting is must. We have voted for our fundamentalists of different caste and religion for last 60 years. We must vote for ours. We see the jungle theif politicians in our daily life and we are so far from voting.

Never do that. These jungle thieves will come again and rule. We will be ruled like slaves. Do not allow. Inquilab Zindabad.

Sardar Bhagat Singh versus Sardar Manmohan Singh || One worked with anti-imperialism and other worked with pro-imperialism.

sahadevan.wordpress.com

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Shaka-Pramukh
by jack back on May 09, 2008 11:03 PM  Permalink
Are you sure Shakha is capable of grooming intelligent mind? If so it's blessing.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Real PM
by mailme alladin on May 09, 2008 10:47 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

It doesn't matter who occupies the chair - Manmohan or Rahul - Sonia is the real
pm of india.
Doesn't matter people of this forum agree or not.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Real PM
by jack back on May 09, 2008 10:49 PM  Permalink
It's true as long as people like you (morans) are around & majority of Indians are tolerant, warm hearted & gullible.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Real PM
by mailme alladin on May 09, 2008 10:58 PM  Permalink
Is it for me? It's for majority of Indians.
DON'T JUMP TO CONCLUSION - does it sound like I want Sonia to be PM. For your information - I'm not a congress supporter - forget about voting for Congress, I never speak anything positive about congress.
Anyway, it doesn't matter, whether you or I like it or not Sonia is the real PM of India.
Indian history is like that - we are still under colonial infulence. We don't appreatiate anything in India until there is a western stamp on it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Real PM
by jack back on May 09, 2008 11:01 PM  Permalink
Point well taken.Apology for misunderstanding.

thanks.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Real PM
by Rajendra Banerjee on May 10, 2008 03:23 AM  Permalink
This person is really a Coolee. He is still adicted foot licker of white skinned persons.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Real PM
by Rajagopal Sadagopan on May 10, 2008 03:43 AM  Permalink
and she wants to retain TR Baalu, Anbumani and other divisive forces. She is scared of what Nalini Murugan will speek about Rajiv's killing. She needs to keep LTTE in good books which means be cool with DMk and PMK who have direct access to Prabhakaran.

If Murugan spills the beans, she would not able to contain the after effects like what she had managed with Indira's commission which had repeatedly pointed the needle of supecion on her.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Real PM
by mahendra sapa on May 09, 2008 10:53 PM  Permalink
Of all the participants even if 10 % starts thinking (on a continious basis) about India's future and of that 10% even if 1% forms an organization and takes some action that will be sufficient.

It's easy to advise from the sidelines, but the fun begins when you take a plunge.

My best wishes to fellow Indian.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Strip them naked and boil them in oil
by on May 09, 2008 11:08 PM  Permalink
No San man....Karuna has been drilling all mothers and sisters of TN with his glasses on..Ask your women to share with us the experience though..
Regional Party Supporters are prohibited on this forum....Jai Hind !!!!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Strip them naked and boil them in oil
by Vijay B on May 09, 2008 11:15 PM  Permalink

Haha good one! The way San man is supporting that demon, its evident he must've had a lot of experience doing the laundry for the DMK workers' lungis.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Strip them naked and boil them in oil
by Vijay B on May 09, 2008 11:59 PM  Permalink

I'm guessing your Mother will be cursing why she bore a son like you.

Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Strip them naked and boil them in oil
by Vijay B on May 09, 2008 11:08 PM  Permalink

Very sorry for missing your name too - you should also be stripped naked and fried alongwith those pieces of shit, and then fed to the crocs. Well after all it is your Islamic law to do such things, so why're you so pissed? Peed in your pants when you realized that you are also suscpetible to your own society's laws??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Strip them naked and boil them in oil
by anant narayanan narayanan on May 10, 2008 10:16 AM  Permalink
Mr.San Man. Idiot. If somebody opposes this idiot Karunanidhi, your leader, that means only Brahmins will oppose him? Idiot don't think like that. Go and interact with crores of Non-Brahmin population. They also do not like this Karunanidhi. Never think that only Brahmins oppose and did not like Karunandhi. See the voting pattern. You go party-wise vote bank in which AIDMK stands first. that means the total ADMK people oppose this one yed Karnunanidhi. I am not a brahmin. I do not like this idiot Karunanidhi who spoil the Tamil Culture.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:Strip them naked and boil them in oil
by Vijay B on May 10, 2008 12:00 AM  Permalink

I don't hate anyone. But you are a complete loser and sick person. Your Mom will sure enjoy reading what you're writing about others' Parents. She will be proud of how she brought you up won't she?

Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
RE:RE:Strip them naked and boil them in oil
by mailme alladin on May 09, 2008 11:01 PM  Permalink
whom to you want to keep? Congress? BJP? Lallu, Mulayam, Mayabati? Jaylalitha?

Sab-ke sab ko jalwa dena chahiye.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Strip them naked and boil them in oil
by Vijay B on May 09, 2008 11:10 PM  Permalink

Sab ko phodo mujhe aitraaz nahin.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
What if Advani is no more?
by mahendra sapa on May 09, 2008 10:20 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Did I shocked anybody? I repeat my question, what if tomorrow Advani dies? Who will be selected as BJP nominee? Any need to guess. Obviously it will be Narendra Modi. That's the best scenario that could happen to India and worst scenario for Gandhi dynasty.

Even citizens who are pro-congress know that he is a very able and capable leader who can run the administration smoothly and take GOOD DECISIONS.

Any comments??? I'll be very happy if the above becomes true. Note, critical thing here is that the event should happen all of a sudden.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:What if Advani is no more?
by jack back on May 09, 2008 10:39 PM  Permalink
Another point...

Don't forget Congress claimed that only they can provide a stable government who can do for full term.

And guess what happened? Mr Vajpeyee, even though did not have clear majority, he invented & applied successfully the concept of stable coalition government. In his term he achieved much more than all other previous administrations combined.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What if Advani is no more?
by jack back on May 09, 2008 10:33 PM  Permalink
I don't know if you are one of those congi/commie to scare others or one of those who is scared & passing the fear on.

Look at Narendra Modi's true trac record.If he was so bad he would not have gotten elected the way he did in last election.As per some reports from main stream media (very hostile to Modi) he had 30% support from Muslim community.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What if Advani is no more?
by Tarak on May 09, 2008 10:26 PM  Permalink
Everybody is so scared of Modi that people(congress and english media) started judging that he lost the opportunity at the national level when he made comments about Shrabuddin.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
After Nehru who?
by Ramesh Kapoor on May 09, 2008 10:10 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Mr. Shenoy and many readers will recall the common statement during the 1950s and early 1960s, as to who will be India's next prime minister. There were many names during the time that were floated, except that at the end barring a short spell by Late Lal Bahadur Shastri, it never dawned on India that a dynasty will be born and it would be Nehru's Daughter, Indira Gandhi, and the rest is history. The Indian National Congress has maneuvered its way by various methods and is where it is, although decimated in number, but still holding the Indian charter of governance. So nothing wrong is seen if it is Rahul, Priyanka or her children. India is not a democracy but a suspect autocracy. Arjun Singh only recently said, democracy does not exist in Congress party.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:After Nehru who?
by jack back on May 09, 2008 10:23 PM  Permalink
Simple calculation...

All you need is 35% popular vote to get majority in the parliament.
-18% minority guarunteed (by extreme apeasement)
-2% voter manipulations
-10% chamchas for mere self-interest
-5% simply buy them out using national wealth.

On the top
-Let more illegal infiltrate from Bangladesh etc. It will change it up from 18% to higher.
-Manipulate caste frictions thru reservation & other means so you can increase voter manipulation up from 2%
-Loot the people more & deposit in the foreign banks so they also have reason to support you to stay in power. And more wealty you are more you can buy the votes.
-As they see you more successful more will decide to be your chamchas

Only in India. I have come across people from 3rd world countries in Africa who laugh at Indians in this matter.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:After Nehru who?
by on May 09, 2008 10:58 PM  Permalink
good observation!
-18% - gujjus
-2% - voter manipulations
-10% - fake voting.
5% - simply buy them out using money collected in name of charity from us, uk.

No wonder people from 3rd world laugh at you.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:After Nehru who?
by jack back on May 09, 2008 11:19 PM  Permalink
I don't think we are talking about religion. You seem to have mistaken me for a missionary.Once I saw their statistics for conversion in this manner where they identify people by region & use/abuse the NGOs for manipulating politics.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:After Nehru who?
by Vijay B on May 09, 2008 11:37 PM  Permalink

And what about the fourth grade Shariat kakkoos country you owe your allegiance to? Forget laughing, the 3rd world country people will spit on you and your people. Bada aaya Gujaratis ke baare baat karne waala. Tu unke joothe ke neeche dhool ke baraabar nahin hain saale.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:After Nehru who?
by san man on May 09, 2008 11:38 PM  Permalink
if ppl in africa laugh at u then suk an african di*ck

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:After Nehru who?
by jack back on May 09, 2008 11:51 PM  Permalink
Oh is that how you handle it. Let Modi be powerful & you will do that to him too. (Only if he let his civility compromised to let you satisfy your need)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Oh my India
by Raghavendra R Ravi on May 09, 2008 10:09 PM  Permalink 

Current politics in India is not democracy - it is Dynastocracy - When the kings ruled India there must have been atleast 200 families that ruled India. Now under the guise of democracy just 20 families are ruling India. We should stop this sham democracy. We should enact one more constitutional amendment to say that one person cannot be a prime minister for more than one term. Sons and daughters can become prime minsters only after 20 years after their father / mother or brother / sister happenned to be a prime minister. We can bring back some semblance of democracy then...now it is Karunanidhi's/ Mulayam Yadav's/Lalu's/Sonia's/Thackeray's/Pawar's family affair. This should be broken even if it is unfair to some sons and daughters.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Intelligent logic.....
by jack back on May 09, 2008 09:57 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Whether sane people like it or not the situation is created in which the current junta has to select outsourced Rahul as their leader.And majority of people are kept so deeply ignorant (of course by Congi/Commie/Chamchas) they will not find it objectionable.

Nehru was the worst raskal unfortunate India had who instead of truely uplifting the torturtured nation, uplifted his clan in the name of peace & humanity. He carried forward the barbaric policies imposed by foreign rulers for so long, of course cleaverly.

Nehru never bothered to groom a leader from his group, not even within his own family.Who so ever was efficient he sidelined them cleverly.Ultimately his daughter had to be brought to power who was never even able or trained to faithfully & responsibly run the government.

Sad still, people think Nehru was great & his clan did a lot good for the nation.Good just happened by grace of God & cultural strength of Indians & Nehruvians took credit for it.And again whatever good that happened was a fraction of what could have been done.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Intelligent logic.....
by Tarak on May 09, 2008 10:06 PM  Permalink
Well said, Nehru was more english than indian. He tried his best to vandalize hindu/indian identity culturally, econamically, and politically.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Intelligent logic.....
by Vijay B on May 09, 2008 10:44 PM  Permalink

Nehru was a f*cker. He f*cked the nation for his own gratification. Sinner. To top it all he left his progeny behind to carry on his work. Like the plague they have infected everyone else.

Baap ki jaagir samajh rakha hai desh ko in Congress waalon ne.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
good try...
by ravinandanprakash agrawal on May 09, 2008 08:55 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

good try to throw his name but believe it or not he will become PM without people like you.. India has enough people who can't think..dont try to give this psycophant article of yours the name called journalism. You are not a journalist.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:good try...
by Tarak on May 09, 2008 10:01 PM  Permalink
TVR Shenoy is a well known congress dog in journalist fraternity. He can't wait for his master to take over the prime ministership.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:good try...
by sri on May 09, 2008 10:51 PM  Permalink
Not really. If you read any of his articles which you dont appear to have (!), you will know that he is very much in the center between the Congress and BJP. Maybe even a little closer to the BJP. But no matter, he is always fair and calls a spade a spade. And he doesnt use words like "dog" for other people. He leaves that to lesser individuals.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:good try...
by sri on May 09, 2008 09:55 PM  Permalink
What is YOUR reason for you to say what you did? Shenoy is talking of facts and not insulting Singh. The position of Singh in the COngress is very weak becasue he doesnt have a political base. What is unreasonable about that? Shenoy is an excellent journalist. YOU, my dear, cant think or stay above common emotion!

By the way, you dont generally call an article sycophantic!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:good try...
by antonio on May 09, 2008 09:56 PM  Permalink
The rat manwoman singh was hiding when his community brothers were massacred in 1984 in the basement of 10 janpath........about time the sikhs declare him a ''tankhaiyaa''!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rahul Gandhi for prime minister?
by VH on May 09, 2008 08:45 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

FYI Communists have already started campaigning for this.

First buddha said that Manmohan is weak and congress is getting weak because of him. Why is he so concern about congress? Then he said today again that Manmohan is a waste.

Their idea is if there is a chance of third front after election then make Communist guy as a prime minister. God bless India!

If there is no chance for third front and it is almost certain that congress wont get more seats than it currently has (in next general election) then congress need support from communists. So Sonia can say communists wont support Manmohan so we will make Rahul as prime minister.

After all what communists gain by opposing Manmohan? Could be that Manmohan is more towards friendship with USA. Or Sonia must have fed them well to say that.

What do you people think?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Total 222 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message