Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 621 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
nuclear deal
by Guest on Jul 01, 2008 02:27 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

prime minister should go head with nuclear deal. There is no need to discuss/debate on this issue. Government is empoweed to take decisons and can take a decision on this just like many decisions that it takes with out unnecessarily engaging in so much of debate.

nuclear power is very essential for the country with out which national progress will be doomed. our coal/ gas/hydro reserves can not generate self sufficiency.We can not depend on pipeline of iran because it passes through pakistan.
Indian communists are merely behaving like agents of china because they get bilateal support from chinese government/ communists .
china does not want india to be strong. They ae worried every since india went in for globalisation.we have to build strong defense against china which is showing its might through its messiles/starwar /atomic weapons.we have to build up all the alliances that are required to defend the nation. Internally communists are trying to weaken the country by opposing nuclear deal.
government will not fall.Communists can not bring no confidence motion because they have to allign with BJP for votes in parliament.The BJP also will not put up no confidence motion for the same reasons.Above all, elections will have to come by march/ aprill 2008.It will be manmohan govenment which will rule till then with full powers and not as caretaker.
BJP AS National party should think more judiciously as nuclear deal is absolutely necessary for the coutry.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:nuclear deal
by All Right on Jul 02, 2008 12:43 PM  Permalink
Nuclear deal is absolutely necessary for the country.... good..

Is country absolutely necessary for the country?

Is poverty eradication absolutely necessary for the country?

Is curbing inflation absolutely necessary for the country?

Is national security absolutely necessary for the country?

When we learn to distinguish between MUST-HAVE and NICE-TO-HAVE features, we will all have won a significant battle..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:nuclear deal
by PALANI KARTHIKEYAN on Jul 02, 2008 01:19 PM  Permalink
well said .... distinguishing MUST-HAVE nad NICE-TO-HAVE.....



   Forward   |   Report abuse
My personal view
by bhupendra gothwal on Jul 01, 2008 02:21 PM  Permalink 

1) A gr8 player could not always be the best captain...we hav all winessed it.
similarly a person excelled in 1 field can't be a leader. ofcourse we don't expect milca sing or PT usha to be the PM of india.

2) Y don't they make tht deal in simpler form availble to the public to analyse and y in so much heist when der r so many other more imp thing to sort out.

3) and lastly we are all also to be blamed to sm extent as in india people who can think hardly votes.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Real Issue
by Dipak Bose on Jul 01, 2008 12:41 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Nuclear power provides only 2 percent electricity. It does not matter for the electricity production if these will be shut.
Nuclear plants are really for the production of nuclear weapons, electricity is just a by-product.
USA wants to roll back India's nuclear weapons programme. This is the real issue.



    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
RE:Real Issue
by Prem Kumar on Jul 01, 2008 01:30 PM  Permalink

Hi Communist Bose,

Did you read the agreement?
Can you show me that clause?
Don't stupidly blabber about the thing you know nothing about.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Real Issue
by Dipak Bose on Jul 01, 2008 01:46 PM  Permalink
Read Hyde Act, NSG regulations, IAEA treaty, Fussion cutoff treaty; these are all compenents of the 123 Treaty. Putting all together India will not be allowed to import any technology or materials to manufacture nuclear weapons. FBR, and other facilities producing weapons grade materials will be under the IAEA regulations. IAEA asked India to sign as a non-nuclear weapons state.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Real Issue
by PALANI KARTHIKEYAN on Jul 02, 2008 01:25 PM  Permalink
Prem,
cool it ji,
the truth is always bitter, the ground reality is US stpped putting up new plants after the three island disaster in 1977. Then why alone they wanna force India for a civilian nuke deal.... Lets face the music,
the american companies(nuke plant manufaturing) are forcing their GOVT to get this deal thru for their interest...and DR.MMS is playing the Tune.....
nice music....
even 1% cut hmmmmmmmmm


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Real Issue
by Dipak Bose on Jul 01, 2008 04:11 PM  Permalink
Now Shout Commie Commie Commiee 108 times, you will get a Laddu from Bal Takre


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Real Issue
by Rajan Shah on Jul 01, 2008 11:49 PM  Permalink
oh come on Bose darling, why should anyone shout anything at you. The stench of a turd, especially the communist variety speaks volumes.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Real Issue
by PradeepKumar Nair on Jul 02, 2008 10:29 AM  Permalink
Come on Rajan Shah,

just mind ur words, if u like modi & his party that does not mean that everybody should like them. Every party has its ideology, first try to find out the meaning of ideology rather than concentrating on hating communist

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Real Issue
by Rajan Shah on Jul 02, 2008 11:01 AM  Permalink
Oh Darling Pradeep, how can you say such a horrible thing. I would never fall for Modi. He is bald, greying and not even my type. I hate the smell of fascist turds just as much of communist turds. There happy now darling.

Forward   |   Report abuse
COALIATION DHARMA IS PAIN.
by sudhakar sk on Jul 01, 2008 12:27 PM  Permalink 


Unless we look at the coaliation dharma, which has all these pulls and pushs from the partners.
Communists are trying to hoodwink the country as well our World Famous PM.

Congress will over come this predicament and people of India need to show their place to communist in the next election.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
uneducated country needs uneducated PM
by RajneeshChandraMohan Jain on Jul 01, 2008 11:43 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies


Dr Singh won't understand common uneducated man.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:uneducated country needs uneducated PM
by Prem Kumar on Jul 01, 2008 11:50 AM  Permalink

Dr Singh has Phd in economics from Oxford. And he has been a finance minister for years. And has wealth of experience on economy and finance. But lot of people posting on this board show lot of finance sense than prime minister. If an casual boarder who gambled all his money in stock market has such a economic wisdom, why not PM?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:uneducated country needs uneducated PM
by Dipak Bose on Jul 01, 2008 12:12 PM  Permalink
Have you seen MM Singh's Oxford D.Phil Thesis. I did. There is no mathematics, no statistics, no theory, simple tables all copied from Government of India publication. There is only one conclusion that in future engineering exports will be important( at that time India used to export only tea and jute). This is the knowledge of MM Singh. Those who do PhD in economics from the West knows nothing about the real world. Several Professors from Harvard were recruited by Yeltsin in 1992 after the destruction of the Soviet Union. Within three months they had destroyed the economy of Russia.
Similarly this gang MM Singh, Montek Aluwala, Chidambaram are destroying India.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:uneducated country needs uneducated PM
by RajneeshChandraMohan Jain on Jul 01, 2008 12:17 PM  Permalink

What you are saying is it is very easy to get Phd from Oxford.

From your name, you sound like a communist.
Didn't Garbachev screww Russia?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:uneducated country needs uneducated PM
by Dipak Bose on Jul 01, 2008 01:49 PM  Permalink
Oxford is just a name. Those who got degree from these place in economics, do not know any real world economics. Most Indians who got degrees in economics from these places did very low grade works and then after their return to India they became politicians


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:uneducated country needs uneducated PM
by Prem Kumar on Jul 01, 2008 12:19 PM  Permalink
So Bose,

Your communist friends have better plan for India? Isn't destroying Bengal not enough?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:uneducated country needs uneducated PM
by Sebastian A on Jul 01, 2008 11:53 AM  Permalink
So do u mean INDIA should surrender and make plans for uneducated man..... uneducated should try to become educated.....not vice-versa

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:uneducated country needs uneducated PM
by Dipak Bose on Jul 01, 2008 01:50 PM  Permalink
The kind of education Man Mohan, Montek Aluwala, Chidambaram got have no meaning as you can already see: inflation, house price going through the roof, farmers suicides, no jobs .....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:uneducated country needs uneducated PM
by Aniket Gajendragadkar on Jul 02, 2008 01:48 AM  Permalink
Can you explain how the same MM Singh bailed us out in 1991 situation when the entire nation was on the verge of bankruptcy? My advice: try to live in a real world with real people. Have you ever given a thought to the problems we might face in case we don't sign the deal? Think that way and you will find answers yourself.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:uneducated country needs uneducated PM
by RajneeshChandraMohan Jain on Jul 01, 2008 11:58 AM  Permalink

During Ram Rajya all the people were uneducated including the King. And they lived so happily.

Education is the root cause of all of India's problem.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
PM should quit on inflation basis and not on N- deal basis
by arun tailor on Jul 01, 2008 11:31 AM  Permalink 

PM should quit on inflation basis and not on N- deal basis. we remember the 1991 economic reforms done by MM Singh. But at this moment he his titular head of country. He should leave. He should be PM if he realy enjoys the powers of PM and able to implement his ideas on his own basis. The situation is worse cause the power holders "Mother and Child " are seating safe behind the curtail. If matters comes to any new inaugration sonia goes for that, but if the things are bad she never face the public.
She is the real culprit


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Mr Singh resign.... as soon as possible
by Vineit on Jul 01, 2008 11:28 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Mr Manmohan Singh, you may be an renowed economist, but you are NOT CAPABLE enough to become or remain as a Prime Minister.

During your rule, cost of petroleum prices have double, evry thing getting costlier 3-4 times.

lots of farmers killing themselves, common people suffering with unemployment, poverty etc.

please for sake of country resign, also take finance minister along with you.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Mr Singh resign.... as soon as possible
by Sebastian A on Jul 01, 2008 11:54 AM  Permalink
If common people is not willing to work or study. MMS can do that for them. He did his part ...

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
SARDAR KO GHUSSA MAT DILAOOO
by BraveIndian on Jul 01, 2008 11:17 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

HE WILL KILL ALL LEFT PARTY MEMBERS.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:SARDAR KO GHUSSA MAT DILAOOO
by Hari Babu on Jul 01, 2008 10:07 PM  Permalink
There is no improvement in any area after Congress came into power. Not to blame Man Mohan singh, Congress looks just for power not to develop any thing.
Which is the shame on congress..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
What do we gain
by Dipak Bose on Jul 01, 2008 10:43 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

It is not a matter of Islam or China but a matter of India's defence against China and Pakistan and India's role in the world affairs.
1) Nuclear deal will make India naked against possible nuclear blackmail from China and Pakistan. China and Pakistan will walk over India.
2) India would be branded as one of the supporter of that dreadful alliance( USA-UK-Australia) who have killed more than one million in Iraq, destroyed that country, looted everything they can see. They have also killed 3-4 million people in Vietnam and Cambodia only a few years ago. India will then draw the wrath from the Muslims who are our friends ( Iraq, Syria, Palestine, Algeria, Egypt, Afghanistan)
3) It will destroy India's close link with Russia, who has supplied everything to India for the last 60 years and defended India in 1971.

In return we will get only some obsolete vintage reactors from USa at a very high cost and these may not even work but will kill thousands of people( Remember the gifts from USA: ENRON and UNION CARBIDE)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:What do we gain
by Sivam Kumaran on Jul 01, 2008 12:16 PM  Permalink
Dipak Bose, I laugh at your 20th century idea. This is 21st century and things have changed quite a lot.
It is US fighting our war in Afghanistan, so that we face less attack now in the border.
How many international forums the middle east supported India. Check at the 1971 war details to under stand whom they supported.What about it jobs now. Please leave the expired ideas and hand over the mandate to youngsters to manage and retire.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What do we gain
by arun tailor on Jul 01, 2008 11:34 AM  Permalink
well said dear!
still union carbide victims are waiting for justice, and our GOVT is kissing the shose of US.
Had our GOVT done any thing against the company?
No.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What do we gain
by Prem Kumar on Jul 01, 2008 12:34 PM  Permalink

Muslim countries are friends.
Have you been to Malaysia or Saudi??? They treat Indians like person with Leprosy. You are living in ivory tower. Welcome to 21st century.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What do we gain
by Dipak Bose on Jul 01, 2008 01:52 PM  Permalink
There are two types of Muslim countries. Pakistan, Saudi, Malaysia, Bangladesh, UAE, Kuwait etc are against us. Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Egypt, Algeria are our friends for a long time.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What do we gain
by Dipak Bose on Jul 01, 2008 02:06 PM  Permalink


The real issue is nuclear weapons. USA do not want India to be a nuclear weapon state. Clinton said that openly, " I loath to even think think that India Pakistan are nuclear armed states". This is the real issue.
Those who have taken bribes from their American boss would support the treaty with the help of most corrupt politicians like Molaem Yadav and Amar Singh, but history will not forgive these new Mir Jafars.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
All of India is for civilian Nuclear-deal
by SANJEEV KUMAR on Jul 01, 2008 10:18 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Time to show some backbone by Dr.Singh and Sonia Gandhi. The way Congress has been Blackmailed by karat's Communists since last 4-years is Criminal. And now the communists are playing Communal-Card as last-ditch attempt.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:All of India is for civilian Nuclear-deal
by Ram Sharma on Jul 01, 2008 02:33 PM  Permalink
Don't forget it is only bcz of the left support that Sonia is ruling only with 145/545 strength. It can also b said that Congress is blackmailing left. Both r blackmailing each other. Both know each other very well since long as they fight with each other in WB, Keral and Tripura.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 621 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message