Let me remind you. This is what you said : "Take the History, there have never been a soul in History like Muhammed (peace be upon him), who was a peace lover, and who even set free the prisoners of war, and who hated the sword and bloodshed than anyone in this world."
Now you are saying that Muhammad was in fact a military general, and he could not set free these prisoners of war, but had to kill them.
Please state what you truly believe. No Taqqiya please.
When the withdrawal of left support from the govt on China's instructions was being discussed all over the country and the left party's credibility was at the lowest end in the century, was this series blasts in two cities aimed at diversing the people's focus to save thier skin? As SIMI has strong base in West Bengal (govt supported in some cases) and UP (hence Karat's successive post poll meeting with Mayavati) and the communist's past track records of killing millions of innocents in the killing fields of Campuchia to bamboo gulags of North Korea to siberian camps and so on,not to forget the brutal killing of opponent poltical supporteres in WB/Kerala/Tripura, for the slightest paranoic pretext of saving their bloody red skins. the ultimate focus will always come back to you my dear Mr. Karat.
RE:Shift the focus tactics?
by ANKUR SRIVASTAVA on Jul 28, 2008 08:04 AM Permalink
Dahshat/Khoon Kharaba ka naam hain ISLAM....and Vice Versa ...........
RE:Prophet Muhammed in AtharvaVeda
by Subrata Karmakar on Jul 28, 2008 08:09 AM Permalink
Hi Ismail great research work man! I admire your belief and calmness. Please forget some of the inhuman responses you have recvd here. We Indians are all in the same family man, most of us believe so.
RE:Prophet Muhammed in AtharvaVeda
by All Right on Jul 28, 2008 07:55 AM Permalink
Since Vedas predated Mohamed and Islam by thousands if not millions of years, are you accepting that Islam is an offshoot from the Santan Dharma?... :-)
Or that ancient Hindus (or whatever religion they practiced back then) were much more advanced in predicting future than Mohamed himself?...
I'm kinda getting mixed messages in your rhetoric - at best, and a pitiful justification and trying to twist and browbeat facts into a badly thought up theory - at its worst.
RE:Prophesies of Muhammad (pbuh) foretold in HINDU Scriptures
by All Right on Jul 28, 2008 07:49 AM Permalink
Ismail:
Good to know that Mohamed was first purified of all sins through Ganga's holy water....
Maybe this treatment needs to be repeated for every follower of this Malecha spiritual teacher too... which didn't happen, and hence they are still sinful.... :-)
Just pulling your leg, since you are introducing arbitrary text into the conversation, and interpreting it more arbitrarily, I though I'll add my peculiar twist to the tale... :)
RE:Prophesies of Muhammad (pbuh) foretold in HINDU Scriptures
by All Right on Jul 28, 2008 07:59 AM Permalink
You didn't answer my question..... Is the current sinful state of Mohamed's followers simply becoz instead of taking that sin-cleansing holy dip in Ganga, they are going way too off on a tangent to Mecca Medina etc.?... :-)
My standard disclaimer: Just pulling your leg, since you are introducing arbitrary text into the conversation, and interpreting it more arbitrarily, I though I'll add my peculiar twist to the tale... :)
A government that would not act boldly against terrorists is as guilty as the terrorists themselves.
Even though we have Criminal Penal Code there are crimes. That does not mean CPC is a waste. In the same way stringent laws are necessary to act against terrorists.
1. Enact POTA like laws. 2. Infiltrate the groups and madrassas. 3. Expedite terrorist trials. 4. Build ultra maximum security prisons for the terrorists. 5. Implement punishment to the convicted terrorists. 6. Follow zero sympathy and zero tolerance to terrorists.
If we don't do all these we will not be a super power but a banana power competing with Pak.
You say : "Take the History, there have never been a soul in History like Muhammed (peace be upon him), who was a peace lover, and who even set free the prisoners of war, and who hated the sword and bloodshed than anyone in this world."
What do you have to say about the slaughter of 900 members of Banu Qurayza that Muhammad ordered and watched?
RE:Mr. Ismail Khan
by Jai Singh on Jul 28, 2008 08:56 AM Permalink
Krishna suggested this because Kauravas were involved in doing wrong things. If you terrorist SIMI & HUJI fools do not stop creating these blasts, we will eliminate all of you fools from India forgetting that you are our brothers n sisters. Listen it you bloody fool Ismail Khan.
RE:Mr. Ismail Khan
by Jai Prakash Singh on Jul 28, 2008 07:45 AM Permalink
ISLAM is like bacteria. It helps man in digestion. But harmful bacteria is very dangerous and if you allow it to grow, it will cover and destroy your body. So you need antibiotics periodically to control harmful bacteria population. Muhammed Saheb designed Islam to grow, expand n grow fast, to take everything under its control.
RE:Mr. Ismail Khan
by TuetonicKnight on Jul 28, 2008 10:23 AM Permalink
Mohammad was born during 600AD. My question is what happened to people born befor this? did they all go to Hell(As Kafirs) ? :)
RE:Mr. Ismail Khan
by Jai Singh on Jul 28, 2008 07:54 AM Permalink
1. Worship only god and destroy all human being using blasts. 2. Yes to poor terrorist organizations, off course. 3. Poor n needy are again the terrorist organizations only in your view. If there are no poor n needy, create them using blasts. 4. Islam sleeps with the evil, well known. So please shut up Mr. Ismail.
Let me remind you. This is what you said : "Take the History, there have never been a soul in History like Muhammed (peace be upon him), who was a peace lover, and who even set free the prisoners of war, and who hated the sword and bloodshed than anyone in this world."
Now you are saying that Muhammad was in fact a military general, and he could not set free these prisoners of war, but had to kill them.
Please state what you truly believe. No Taqqiya please.
The day before these blasts, US declared to give a lot of money to Pak to upgrade its F-16s. After nuclear deal, what ever money will be paid to US, a part or whole of it will come to Pak in some or other name and then to terrorists. So Pak or US do not need to spend their money to destroy India. Nuclear Deal may be good for India but the character of the countries like US is always doubtful. It has always believed in creating unstability in the different parts of the world. Not providing any money to Pak can be made a part of the deal though I do not think US will accept it. Though Russia accepts it many times.
RE:Its indian money in terrorist hands!
by Rupakshi on Jul 28, 2008 07:44 AM Permalink
US is largely responsible for the carnage in India (Kashmir), Afghanistan etc. US, knowingly or unknowingly funds Islamic terror in the world. Pak is a strategic land and poses as its alley, it is enough for the American Politicians whose IQ-well we cannot comment about.
