Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 198 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Congress is mother of all corruption
by Indian Indian on Jul 20, 2008 09:52 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Congress is mother of all corruption
The so called Mr. Clean Manmohan Singh may not be taking money for himself but he's overseeing crores being exchanged. The present govt. has broken all records of naked corruption by politicians. This is a subject of shame for every Indian...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Congress is mother of all corruption
by ajman on Jul 20, 2008 09:57 PM  Permalink
ya mate party with diffrence bjp is so pure like gold Reasons??? Human trafficking, coffin scam,Thelka exposure, ,even money for asking peoples problems in parlament,
Yes man Hail BJP because it is 916 pure gold.No corrupton at all with that party

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Congress is mother of all corruption
by Singh SD on Jul 20, 2008 10:54 PM  Permalink
My dear u are the person who cannot judge any person correctly.It is misfortune of India that India is flooded with persons like u .In fact it is the biggest problem with opposition to nail Manmohan SIngh on this issue but parasites like u are becoming stumbling blocks in the way of New India.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Somnath has tasted power and position, he dont want to loose it
by jet on Jul 20, 2008 09:50 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

In his long political career Somanth has for the first time got a high profile position, He just dont want to loose it. The speaker post may be a constitutional post, but that person will always be from the ruling govt. He became speaker because of his CPI-M affiliation. He should have resigned once his party withdrew support. An example is that the governors appointed by a govt generally resign after the govt change. This guy dont want to loose his position and shamelessly sticking to it..

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
RE:Somnath has tasted power and position, he dont want to loose it
by Singh SD on Jul 20, 2008 11:00 PM  Permalink
My dear JET u are wrong here 100%.When Somnath Plunged into politics he belonged to one of the richest families of Bengal at that time.SO your thinking is just rotten that after tasting power & position he doesn't want to loose that.U people who can raise their finger on SOMNATH must be insane.Mind it one thing after elected to the post of Speaker his political affiliation almost becomes dot,so forget about priniciple's and ethics ,I think that should be applicable to Parkash Karat & Mr Bardhan of CPI.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Somnath has tasted power and position, he dont want to loose it
by Sam on Jul 20, 2008 10:15 PM  Permalink

Please remember speaker is a neutral member of the parliment. Every one is bound to perform their DUTY, country is much superior then your party.

We need to salute "Somnath Chatterji" for his committment to the country and to the job [duty] he is due to perform.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
we should appriciate chatterge
by malcom on Jul 20, 2008 09:48 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Indian people should appreciate hon. speaker somnath chatterge on his stand to act as neutral n help the parliament session run smoothly.if u see the present political scenario every politician is looking selfish n acting to earn money this development is bad sign.leftists are foolish people votes should teach lesson in forth coming election such politicians are not needed for India.we should support to such persons like Somnath chatterge.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:we should appriciate chatterge
by K Narasimha Rao on Jul 20, 2008 10:03 PM  Permalink
Kudos to Somnath Chatterjee. Glad to see some senior folks sticking to constitutional norms, instead of plunging India to deeper problems. I am glad that he could play a pivotal role in destroying Commies / Comedians.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:we should appriciate chatterge
by Sam on Jul 20, 2008 10:11 PM  Permalink
Please remember speaker is a neutral member of the parliment. Every one is bound to perform their DUTY, country is much superior then your party.

We need to salute "Somnath Chatterji" for his committment to the country and to the job [duty] he is due to perform.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:we should appriciate chatterge
by T. K. Santosh on Jul 20, 2008 10:01 PM  Permalink
communists did nothing to India simply they are creating problems.when global economic conditions weakens nothing to do with govt.if u go through Europe, north/south America economic conditions are very critical in this moment if u go for elections the burden will be on us.so fight unitedly to solve the problems.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:we should appriciate chatterge
by malcom on Jul 20, 2008 09:53 PM  Permalink
REALLY A GREAT SPEAKER . ALL OF US SHOULD SALUTE 'N' "APPRECIATE HIS STAND"

   Forward   |   Report abuse
tiger200002
by TIGER MAN on Jul 20, 2008 09:44 PM  Permalink 

WIN OR LOSE FOR THIS ONE SIDED DEAL ...CONGRESS HAVE DUG ITS OWN GRAVE FOR THE COMMING GENERAL ELECTIONS

    Forward  |  Report abuse
CPI-M is wrong
by Raja Krsnan on Jul 20, 2008 09:43 PM  Permalink 

CPM is wrong in dragging speaker into controversy at this stage. He has to remain there to see through the trust vote session when parliament meets. when voting takes as per conventions which britishers follow (we hav been takin cues from britishers in many instances) is - in the first instance, he votes with the treasur bench, that is UPA. and still it ends in a tie, needs another voting, he can then vote with the opposition. will he do that. only time will tell that. lets wait till then.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
India does
by Girish Rao on Jul 20, 2008 09:38 PM  Permalink 

not have a single stable culture. India is a melting pot of many diffrent regions and language each with its own diffrent culture. It will be foolhardy to think that Maya's magic will work in South India or in Gujarat for that matter. Remember that South Indians have no fondness for Hindi speakers of the cow-belt.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
comment on deal
by bankat patil on Jul 20, 2008 09:38 PM  Permalink 

Deal is nothing but we are not missutilising the uranium, like pakistan scientist sell the technology,thse dirty politician are indian iliterate plotician opposing they are not interested country just they are making plistics by dirty plitician if deal is anti muslim means apj kalam sir accepted person who nows every thing what these iliterate politician knows development need energy

B.M.patil IIT ROORKEE



    Forward  |  Report abuse
SOMNATH CHATTERJEE____GREAT SPEAKER
by Singh SD on Jul 20, 2008 09:22 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Whatever CPI(M) Will decide but Indians will always remember him as Greatest Speaker of Lok Sabha for all times.His style & approach is above the petty inner politics of parties.It is wrong on the part of CPI(M)to press for his resignation.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:RE:SOMNATH CHATTERJEE____GREAT SPEAKER
by bankat patil on Jul 20, 2008 09:37 PM  Permalink
great somnath

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Somnath Chattrejee & Subhas Chakraborty 2 shocking betrayal see lot more revolt for Karat & party to come from West Bengal.
by Amit Arora on Jul 20, 2008 09:18 PM  Permalink 

Now in Communist own party people started revolt against Prakash Karat and his ideology.
Somnath Chattrejee & Subhas Chakraborty 2 shocking betrayal see lot more revolt for Karat & party to come from West Bengal.
You can't make poor people fool for long time by not doing any progress and forcing your ideology.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Apolitical Speaker vs Karat
by anand mehta on Jul 20, 2008 09:13 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Mr Karat and his party, if they had their way, would like to scarp India Constitution and replace it with a constitution drafted on the basis of Chinese Constitution (if they have one !!). So Somanthji has to be compimented for remaining Speaker. He should NOT resign even after that as he is not obliged to do.
As regrads Nuclear agreement, not deal as that word indicates some sort of arrngement against somebody, India needs Uranium supply NOW. Thorium based system has to be fully developed. Fast Breeder is not covered for inspection. The arrangement has the approval of almost 45 countries INCLUDING Russia and China (as per media). Then the only reason for the left to oppose the agreement is because India would become stronger and could plan higher energy availability for people and industry with help from 'Imperialist' USA; AND THEY WANT CHINA TO REMAIN SUPREME IN THIS REGION. The Mayvatis and Goudas , Ajitsinghs are simply using this God sent, no no CPM sent opportunity to get their pound of flesh from the poor TAx payers. This they have in any case been doing in their respective states.
abmehta

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Apolitical Speaker vs Karat
by bankat patil on Jul 20, 2008 09:30 PM  Permalink
hello anand mehata iam agree with youre statements,deal is nothing but we are not missutilising the uranium, like pakistan scientist sell the technology,thse dirty politician are indian iliterate plotician opposing they are not interested country just they are making plistics by dirty plitician if deal is anti muslim means apj kalam sir accepted person who nows every thing what these iliterate politician knows development need energy

B.M.patil IIT ROORKEE

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Apolitical Speaker vs Karat
by Hate Who divides on Jul 20, 2008 09:56 PM  Permalink
Dont be stupid to say LEFT and chinese are together and all that
But the point is why Indo-US deal??
1) even though russia offered a similar deal with Enrich ment Plant ,Reprocessing Plant , fuel cycle , Reactor for Millitary progamme at low cost with out any restriction of IAEA and NSG
2) well regarding the ful Indian Domiasat Uranium has 16000 tonnes of Uranium which we can use for atleast 100 yrs estimation is much more than that

If you want to be sure google it
so the problem is to understand why UPA want a deal with US
1)just for technology
2)or its a another shortsighted step by congress like 1948, 1962
3)they are under pressure of US
4) or there is deal behind deal

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Apolitical Speaker vs Karat
by anand mehta on Jul 21, 2008 08:56 AM  Permalink
Hello HWD, I am not that much nuclear literate so you may no more about the conditions of the Rusian offer and when it was handles. If you have valid information on our Uranium reserve then you know better. I thought India was keen to have some agreement about uranium supply with Australia.
SO may be the deal is about Tehnology from USA as well as others like France, who can not supply until we sign NPT. This deal as per my understanding was to get over this restriction just for Civilian Power recators. Mil was exclude. Us has to follow its own laws for allowing the supply, so their own acts come into pictur. I am told that ifwe do not like to conform to them then we may not get the inputs from USA but others would be free to trade with us. Bush would obviously like to cal this a feather in his cap. The Indian element in USA is now very strong and may be thay are also behind pushing it as they would not be aware of the new Pres's likes and dislikes. This is my understanding, hence the support. The Left does not like anything with US mark (at least publicly as it may not be so for their family members!). The others non-BJP just want to benefit from the situation brought about by the Left. BJP is definitely acting in a shortsighted manner. They would come to power, if at all, only with others. The history of the nation would indicate whether those opposed have done a bigger blunder than what we blame for every shortcoming the Congress and Nehru. That is the current fashion al

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 198 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Write a message