RE:Jo Bole So Nihal Sat Shree Akal, Wahe Guru Da Khalasa Wahe Guru Di Fateh
by All Right on Jul 12, 2008 01:27 PM Permalink
Hope we have some future too
RE:Jo Bole So Nihal Sat Shree Akal, Wahe Guru Da Khalasa Wahe Guru Di Fateh
by abhimanyu on Jul 12, 2008 01:33 PM Permalink
Dr.Manmohan Singh is the only man in the congress party who is a real man with spine.
The rest are all sycophants and chamchas of sonia, priyanka and rahul, ready to lick their shoes in a split second .
Brajesh Patel once again reiterated that the deal is good for INdia... Advani (with his dhoti in toe .. ALL Right should be happy) rushing to Vajpayee to once and for all stop Mr Brajesh from embarrassing the BJP)
But the million dollar question will he win the trust vote .. if he does .. at least we can get end this discussion and talk about Inflation and the Aarushi murder conspiracy by CBI.
ALL right will stop at 8590 .. he has been simply filling the space .. are U listening !
RE:Nuclear Deal and Inflation
by Bonaventure on Jul 12, 2008 12:20 PM Permalink
*Brajesh Mishra .. I hv been fed with too much cricket ..sorry for tht error
RE:Nuclear Deal and Inflation
by Sabka Baap on Jul 12, 2008 12:11 PM Permalink
Dr. Manmohan Singh has already won the heart of Indian people. But blind followers of political parties will cry foul now. He has created history with decision to go ahead with nuclear deal. He is simple because he is not politician. He can not play dirty politics. That is why these seasoned politicians are crying now in the name of religion and trying to give this deal a religious color.
The bold decisions like this can only be taken by courageous leaders like Mr Manmohan Singh (& not by Dhoti wearing people), who once again showed that no one can stop SIKH's from achieving their target!!!!
RE:Bold Decision
by menda vijaya on Jul 12, 2008 12:07 PM Permalink
Congress always was corageous and still is . It had the courage to stand agaist the 7th fleet in 1971. It had the courage to wage war and break the back of pakistan with one blow. It has the courage to fact any thing that is dangerous to the country.They did Pokharan One.Two or three of four just does not matter.But the Congress had the guts. In the process it had lost two luminous personalities-Indiraji and Rajivji. Show us my dear friends ,any one else in any other party in whole world!!The kind of strength Congress has is some thing phenomenal.But they have immnse patinece and tolerance. Once it is chanllenged, they come out like tsunami. Just watch the progress in few more days to come.People who harp on unknown religious sentiments and unnecessery issues which are ot benefial to aad admi are now scared to face Congress.Those who criticise Congress can do so without any problem.But spreading idsinformation among the public like"the deal is surrendering country's souverignity' is plain bullshit.Now a days people are able to read between the lines.The Congress is great.It always does good for the entire country irrespctive of religion and region .
A lot of Sardars danced at Cochin city, when MMS became PM. But they are now desparate. He could not save Sardars, our country; Congress leaders and Congress cadres. Where is Bhagat Singh and where is Manmohan Singh!
RE:A lot of Sardars danced at Cochin city, when MMS became PM. But they are now desparate. He could not save Sardars, our country; Congress leaders and Congress cadres. Where is Bhagat Singh and where is Manmohan Singh!
by vox populi on Jul 12, 2008 11:22 AM Permalink
SKK can you decipher your stupid messages?
RE:A lot of Sardars danced at Cochin city, when MMS became PM. But they are now desparate. He could not save Sardars, our country; Congress leaders and Congress cadres. Where is Bhagat Singh and where is Manmohan Singh!
by kavitha on Jul 12, 2008 11:30 AM Permalink
tera baap
RE:A lot of Sardars danced at Cochin city, when MMS became PM. But they are now desparate. He could not save Sardars, our country; Congress leaders and Congress cadres. Where is Bhagat Singh and where is Manmohan Singh!
by All Right on Jul 12, 2008 11:31 AM Permalink
How many Sardars are there in Cochin any where? Since the Left took over the State government, the few who have been there, packed their bags and migrated out
RE:A lot of Sardars danced at Cochin city, when MMS became PM. But they are now desparate. He could not save Sardars, our country; Congress leaders and Congress cadres. Where is Bhagat Singh and where is Manmohan Singh!
by menda vijaya on Jul 12, 2008 12:10 PM Permalink
It is sad that no sardar in Punjab voted for MMs's party.It is shame on the fanatical minset which is fanned by religious fanatics and dancers of the chances and filthy opportunists.Some the great sardars have taken back seat.
These paid-servants get media coverage, get medals, honours etc. to abuse good politicians and writers. Obviously, if you sing to the tune of the rulers, gold coins will be thrown to you.
RE:These paid-servants get media coverage, get medals, honours etc. to abuse good politicians and writers. Obviously, if you sing to the tune of the rulers, gold coins will be thrown to you.
by All Right on Jul 12, 2008 11:32 AM Permalink
So how many gold coins Karat threw at you SKK?
RE:These paid-servants get media coverage, get medals, honours etc. to abuse good politicians and writers. Obviously, if you sing to the tune of the rulers, gold coins will be thrown to you.
by trikarn on Jul 12, 2008 05:16 PM Permalink
karat kept the gold coins and gave one to pinnari, one to madani, one to karunaks, one to joti basu, and gave sahadevan a kick in his a...s
Real problem of the country is high population and its high growth. The population is growing in the world, China & India @ 1.2, 0.6 & 1.6% respectively. China has been able to control its growth with one child norm since 1979. But our govt foolishly is not promoting family planning at all. We should also hv one child norm.
The population is increasing mainly in poor families of Hindi belt and specially in poor families of Muslims, which needs special attention.
Family planning is not anti Islam, as Iran is also forcefully following it after Khomeny's era.
We hv only 2.4% of world land but 16% of its population and still increasing, though natural resources r limited, giving rise to prices, scarcity, traffic jam, air and water pollution, deforesting, dropping in sub soil water table (resulting in collapsing of top earth in some places) etc. Still the govt is not serious in this regard. UN is also worried due to populaion growth, as world population has increased from 79 cr in 1800 to 670 cr now.
Congress is hurrying for the n deal to divert peoples' attention from burning problems like galloping inflation.
RE:Real problem is population & not the deal
by menda vijaya on Jul 12, 2008 12:12 PM Permalink
Traffic jam, lowering of water table , poluution are creations of religious fanatics.Not Congress of India which the worlds greatest political party.
RE:Real problem is population & not the deal
by Jayaprakash K on Jul 12, 2008 11:48 AM Permalink
Then there will be another nation wide bandh of VHP, RSS, BJP comrades, and politicis that it is against Hindutua and we will oppose, already VHP president asked hindus to make family planning of 5 child, as they are arguing hindus are minority in India.
RE:Real problem is population & not the deal
by All Right on Jul 12, 2008 11:34 AM Permalink
Your understanding of the issue is tunnel visioned. You do not see the link nuclear has with inflation, fuel price or India's growth story.
Nuclear power is one of the long term strategy to controlling inflation by reducing our dependence on fossil fuels and gases
RE:Real problem is population & not the deal
by All Right on Jul 12, 2008 01:33 PM Permalink
:-)
My CLONE:
Yeah Nuclear power is certainly linked to inflation, mortality rate in the Timbuktu, the length of China wall, the seven wonders of the world, to the height of Eiffel Tower, and what not.
Some economics experts (I believe MY CLONE included) were preaching on this forum that inflation is a global phenomenon and cannot be controlled by Congress government -- it's something to be blamed only on BJP government whenever it comes in power.. :-)
Now I see MY CLONE challenging Ram Sharma's tunnel vision... my clone -- if you reduce population, the dependence on fossill fuels will automatically reduce...
Hope you have some IQ left (stealing and persisting with my name indicates otherwise though) to start listening to some sense that people like Ram Sharma bring to this forum..
Otherwise your types will certainly take the country in pre-1947 days.... awaiting General Dyer to set things right with his troop of shooters.. ;-)
The opening paragraph is written needlessly cumbersome. Separate sentences are joined with 'and' in three places. At least the writers and editors should refer to class five grammar books before coming up with such crap.
RE:please learn to write lead/ intro properly
by Kannan SivaramanViswanatha on Jul 12, 2008 10:35 AM Permalink
Friend, Breaking up sentences in simple form has its own advantages but when the "thought- process" runs into a seamless communication of "punch" ideas, use of conjunctions is inevitable. You don't simply kill the thought, just to conform to orthodox rules of grammar. You mentioned 3 "ands" but actually the first and the last serve the purpose of combining (a) two nouns and (b)two results that follow in logical order. Nothing wrong with the author's writing style. The second "and" could not have been sacrificed in preference to simple composition because the main and subordinate clause are aptly in place. You have needlessly railed against a distinguished writer, just to raise a point. More important than strict observance of grammar is what I would term a " train of free flow of ideas".
RE:please learn to write lead/ intro properly
by Anointed One on Jul 13, 2008 12:29 AM Permalink
dear friend the writer's thought process simply did not need that stupid structure he chose to write. "The Indian American community and US business that had lobbied feverishly for the Indo-US civilian nuclear deal, are euphoric Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's decision to go ahead with the accord." could have served as a better start and niceties following in subsequent paragraphs. It makes is clearer, shorter and cogent.
No need to sign the deal in a hurry till Hyde act applicability is removed. I had been telling in my messages that the next US President will also b willing to sign the deal, as now OBAMA has confirmed. Bcz the deal is very good for the businessmen of US.
Congress is crying that the deal is very good for India, hence the deal will not b signed after Bush, which is proved as a lie. Congress also had earlier said that the details of IAEA document r secret, as their publication will b bad for security of our reactors. But this was also a lie, as it is now open.
Congress has suddenly decided to go fast on the deal only bcz they want to divert the peoples' attention from the burning problems like galloping inflation.
RE:No need to sign the deal in a hurry till Hyde act applicability is removed
by menda vijaya on Jul 12, 2008 12:16 PM Permalink
Hide the Hyde pact.It is useless.Dont show Bhoot to gain popularity, which is being done now by religious fanatics and it will boomarange with full force eventually.The Nuke deal is fantastic for the nation.We want clean energy. When countries like China is going for 30 nuclear reactors, US for 100, Russia for 100 and France 50, whyshould India lag behind!! For religious fakirs who stad in the dias with fanatics in the art of stealing and Bhoga asanas ???
RE:No need to sign the deal in a hurry till Hyde act applicability is removed
by sobha joshi on Jul 12, 2008 10:46 AM Permalink
Removal of dogmatism and acceptance of what is good for the nation is the need of the hour. Petty ideologies of outdated mindsets need to change with the times. We should learn to be Indians first and political parties and their followers later. There is no wrong if the Congress is getting the deal through now, or will somebody accept it only if the deal is done by the other political spectrum of the NDA. If Obama has also given his approval for the deal, it is a great achievement for the present UPA government. What is the need to delay if the Communists had already decided to oppose it. Come on,as a nation, give credit to whoever deserves it, the UPA is only following up on the Good work of NDA. All will benefit, muslims incuded, leave orthodox and divisive feelings aside and become like the Americans, think of the country first and foremost.
RE:RE:No need to sign the deal in a hurry till Hyde act applicability is removed
by PKN on Jul 12, 2008 11:49 AM Permalink
Either you don’t know the meaning of dogmatism or you are confused. Dogmatism is 1. Suggesting that all objections to the deal arise from the fact that Congress is doing it. And refusing to believe that there may be other reasons for such objections. 2. Suggesting that since Obama has approved it so it is good deal. (Obama has not said that he thinks that the deal very good for India, all he has said is that he will not change it if he becomes the President) Obama is not from Indian, he is an American! Only somebody stupid will suggest that his opinion should be a matter for this nation taking a stand. Would you ask Ricky Ponting to decide the batting order for the Indian Team in an India Vs Australia match? If not why are you celebrating Obama's endorsement? 3. And finally Dogmatism is teaching Indians to think of their country first and trust not only George Bush but also Barak Obama and John Mc Cain on what is good for one's own country
RE:No need to sign the deal in a hurry till Hyde act applicability is removed
by PKN on Jul 12, 2008 11:33 AM Permalink
Let us first accept that the N-deal is not about politics it is about the need to use N-energy for giving this nation an energy security. If that is the premise, then there are too many questions that remain unanswered. 1. The deal on paper looks good .Why is the Congress promoting it as though there is something to hide? 2. For almost 3 years the Congress believed that they will get the Left to support it. How can this nation trust a party that could not assess the intention of its own ally to judge an international deal? 3. Globally bi-partisan support is possible for issues like this. The BJP could have been gotten around to supporting the deal. But the Congress felt that working with the BJP would go against its own vote bank politics. 4. The BJP is no better; they are willing to play the Muslim card- YES THE MUSLIM CARD - to make their point. Here is a deal that by most standards was a good one. The Congress needs to be blamed in the manner in which it screwed up the whole thing to meet its own political ends. If the deal doesn’t go through the Congress will have only itself to blame.
