RE:Article by whom?
by Dinesh on Jul 11, 2008 09:15 PM Permalink
To counter the high prices, there should have been plan during the last fifty years of rule. Like nuclera power, oil exploration, dams, electrified railways etc. Where is the vision by the congies?
RE:Article by whom?
by Pradeep Purohit on Jul 11, 2008 09:18 PM Permalink
CAN YOU ASSURE THAT THE BJP GOVERNMENT WILL CHANGE THE CONDITIONS OVERNIGHT? STOP BEING FOOLISH GUYS...
RE:Article by whom?
by icha sharma on Jul 11, 2008 09:17 PM Permalink
fuel cost $145 a barrel in world market.recession and high food cost all over the world.take off UPA from world power..you brainless tinku
RE:Article by whom?
by Atul Kulshrestha on Jul 11, 2008 09:40 PM Permalink
sharma ji how many litre are their in a barrel. Please tell me how come even today India has cost of petrol higher than countries like Pak Malaysia or Thailand which have no subsidies on fuel. While we are at it can you also enlighten me what is % of taxes included in the price we pay for petrol?? Thanks in advance for letting me know the truth
RE:Article by whom?
by manoo kaushal on Jul 11, 2008 09:03 PM Permalink
Advani is brave , courageous and far sighted leader. Manmohan is weak, puppet and lacklustre person. So Adavani is obvious choice.
RE:Article by whom?
by Jitendra Kumar on Jul 11, 2008 09:15 PM Permalink
He has guts to lie on your face. He did not know anything about kandahar episode as home minister. Manmohan can not do such bravoes act. Modi lao Jhoothvani bhagao.
RE:Article by whom?
by Babua on Jul 11, 2008 09:01 PM Permalink
Hindus are not safe under Congress rule. See wht happened in J & K. Hindus were killed in the name of land transfer to shrine. pseudo seculars like sandeep are a curse on our nation.
RE:Article by whom?
by Pradeep Purohit on Jul 11, 2008 09:10 PM Permalink
YEa, Hindus are safe with BJP only.. coz VHP and bajrang dal are with them..... right?? Try to see the reality of all the violence happened during that Bandh.. Wat we have to do with a land in JK?? why all india was called for bandh?? is this a solution? what was the result? only violence? by bjp and bajrang dal?
We donot want safety at the cost of our other brother's life man! lets be one! as indian...... lets not call it hindu or muslim........
RE:RE:Article by whom?
by icha sharma on Jul 11, 2008 09:07 PM Permalink
kill everyone other than hindu..india will be ours.. after all who is HINDU.?.those who live near or on the banks of sindhu river...so real HINDU's are in pakistan now.you BJP-VHP-BAJRAJUNGLEE..
Its really a tough ask from poor indians to decide their own fate! I think, what congress has done in past 40 years, BJP has just taken advantage of that and flash their own names... How can we have a pakistani man as our PM if we cannt have an italian who is india's daughter-in-law? If you dont know.. Mr. advani is a pakistani by birth. There are only 3 politicians in todays politics which I admire most. They are our very own Lalu ji, chandra babu naidu and MMS. I think these are the men who really worked towards the development of india while taking care of poors. Obviously, if you have to develop a country of 100 crore people out of which 70% are poor, you need time.. and I think 5 years is not enough time for any politician. Things cannt change overnight guys! we need to work hard.. we all need to ...........yes there is a need of proper management, which Lalu can do for sure........... I bet!
RE:MMS or Adwani ....... I would say Why not LALU!!!
by Sastry on Jul 11, 2008 09:01 PM Permalink
I am sorry that you have been so brainwahed by the P-Secular forces that you don't distinguish the difference between Congress created Pakistan (So that Nehru did not have trouble) and Italy. Even assuming ur interpretation to be correct, Advani CHOSE INDIA to pakistan where as Sonia did not even apply to become a citizen of the country till late Sri Rajiv Gandhi had to become the PM.
RE:MMS or Adwani ....... I would say Why not LALU!!!
by Pradeep Purohit on Jul 11, 2008 09:08 PM Permalink
well.. i guess u are sick and ready to be ruled by a person who always believe in casteism and make indian people fight and act as terrorists during babri masjid massacre... still the hearing is on for that case on advani.... and he is a big liar.. he lied in his book..... and damn.. people started calling him 'loh purush' .. guys are insulting the real ' loh purush' of india. And, lemme see what bjp or ur so called adwani can do to minimize the inflation rate with the high international oil prices..... nobody can do that buddy.. these are all false promises to get into power..... and about Nehru thing...... you were not there so how u know that had really happened? Whatever they did, they did it for independence... and it was the best thing to do........ and its Mrs. Gandhi's personal matter that she wants to apply for citizenship or not.......... she never stayed in india illegally........... Understand!
It is clear from this article provided it is authentic that we are bankrupt as a nation to favour the named three- the first near senile, the second whose only claim to be the daughter-in-law of an astute former PM and whose credentials are only, I repeat only linked to the Gandhi Family and a stupid young man-her son. There are several of self styled Netas who are far better. I even rate a jerk like Jairam ramesh ahead of these three.
what I am trying to say is people definately had in mind many names beyond Rahul Gandhi-Sonia Gandhi-Manmohan singh and Advani
If those ommited choices were not put for a vote then the entire opinion poll smells of a biased attempt to influence the Congress.
Lastly Mr Advani may NOT actually be the BJP Prime Minister if the BJP comes to power, and he may nominate at the last moment someone as the PM is a fact which a lot of BJP insiders discuss openley.
The reality is the entire neuclear fiasco is indeed a ploy to divert attention by the UPA government to the real issue facing the Nation which is highest inflation levels, soaring petrolium costs, food grain shortage and industrial slump. Its a whitewash and smoke screen by the government to keep people blind tothe disaster that is in the awaiting.
People had great expectations of Dr. MMS, but he has failed his admireres like me. I thought he would be a statesman, but he has turned out to be no more than a politician. He has defended the allotment of gas to defunct company for the sake of the coalition, he played the communal card by promising special treatment for minorities (read Muslims) and implying that it was somehow the fault of the majority community that Muslims have not progressed. So, how was he different from the series of very ordinary PMs that we have had since Mrs Indira Gandhi? He has been pathetic, even if we grant that coalition is not an easy situation to handle. One hoped that he will gaind in stature and provide the leadership that will forge coalition of different ideologies into an instrument that will make India truly a democracy in which people of all hues participate, but it has been a government of disparate elements pulling in different directions, in which nothing of substance got done. Only redeeming feature has been that a so far buoyant economy enabled the government to spend freely and make a show of progress.
RE:Whither Dr. Man Mohan Singh
by TIGER MAN on Jul 11, 2008 08:50 PM Permalink
Suresh Bhave ....YEP >>YOU ARe RIGHT...CONGRESS HAD A CHANCE TO COME BACK TO POWER AFTER MANY YEARS....BUT THEY HAVE FAILED IN EVERTHING ....REALLY SPEAKING THEY HAVE GONE FROM BAD TO WORSE...
RE:Whither Dr. Man Mohan Singh
by Dinesh on Jul 11, 2008 08:58 PM Permalink
Congress is a minority appeasement party. It doesnt act opon islamic terrorists. The nuclear deal may be signed even afterwards. But if the life goes by this no action on terrorists, the life cannot be brought back. So the congress is more dangerous to the nation than the benifits from nuclear deal. Therefore the congress must go first.
RE:Whither Dr. Man Mohan Singh
by Sethu Bala Raman on Jul 11, 2008 08:55 PM Permalink
I oblige with you, but can anyone point out any major corruption of UPA Govt. The position of Dr.MMS is great..
RE:Whither Dr. Man Mohan Singh
by Suresh Bhave on Jul 11, 2008 09:21 PM Permalink
My dear Sethu Bala Raman, we are snowed under corruption, where is the questions of differentiating corruption into major and minor? The entire system is rotten and everyone in it (of course, with some exceptions) are corrupt. Therefore, it is like a water supply system that leaks at every joint. All are minor leaks, but in the end, nothing comes out of the tap. Take for example the farmers' loan waiver. If the crops are good, the consumer prices for farm commodities are high, then why is agriculture a lossmaking activity. That is because what the trader gets from consumer is princely and what he pays the farmer is a pittance, so the Rs 60000 crores that the trade has already siphoned off is now being paid out of our tax money by the FM and projecting the government as pro-farmer. What can be a greater fraud than that. Why does the government fix support prices so low? To enable the traders to purchase grain at a little higher to compete with government agencies and sell at a great profit margin. A government beholden to traders cannot be honest. What bigger fraud do you expect?
RE:Whither Dr. Man Mohan Singh
by Dinesh on Jul 11, 2008 09:19 PM Permalink
Major corruption of MMS is allocation of 60000/- crores farm loan waiver. This money is being used by the congie workers only. Very few farmers are getting it is reality. See the news, every day even now farmers are suiciding in Karnataka.
Dr Manmohan Singh was an eminent economist long before he first joined P.V.Narasimha Rao govt as finance minister. Advani's only "title deed to eminence" was the "rath yatra". The choice before Indian electorate is, therefore, clear! mohammadvazeeruddin@rediffmail.com
RE:technocrat versus politician!
by Tushar Sakhalkar on Jul 11, 2008 08:54 PM Permalink
If criteria of EDUCATION is to be applied Sonia (High School?) cannot even stay in India. Half of Congresman will quit politics. There will be hardly any Muslim in Lok Sabha (Unless, like Laloo, you recognise Madrasaa courses as EDUCATION). BJP will come out tops.
RE:RE:technocrat versus politician!
by ouch on Jul 11, 2008 09:04 PM Permalink
there is nobody in BJP to match the stature of MMS. BJP is filled with blind hindutvavadis who go around wearing chadddi and knikcers. Do you think Venkaiah Naidu, Rajnath Singh, Yeddiyurappa are educated lol. They are not even literate.
RE:technocrat versus politician!
by Sastry on Jul 11, 2008 09:12 PM Permalink
There are scores of other economists in the Indian Statistical Institute and various other financial institutions who are equally competent if not more. MMS became the PM just because the wise former PM Sri PVNRao stumbled on his name and made him the FM. He is the PM SOLELY BECAUSE OF HIS LOYALTY TO THE GANDHI FAMILY AND ALSO BECUASE HE CANNOT BACKSTAB THE HIGH COMMAND AS HE IS NOT A PROFFESIONAL POLITICIAN.
RE:technocrat versus politician!
by ouch on Jul 11, 2008 08:52 PM Permalink
heading should not be technocrat versus politician. Heading should be technocrat versus 'sade hua budda'
RE:technocrat versus politician!
by Sathish N on Jul 11, 2008 08:52 PM Permalink
MMS is an eminent economist with no spine. LKA is a seasoned statesman with spine.
RE:technocrat versus politician!
by Dinesh on Jul 11, 2008 08:57 PM Permalink
Congress is a minority appeasement party. It doesnt act opon islamic terrorists. The nuclear deal may be signed even afterwards. But if the life goes by this no action on terrorists, the life cannot be brought back. So the congress is more dangerous to the nation than the benifits from nuclear deal. Therefore the congress must go first.
RE:technocrat versus politician!
by ouch on Jul 11, 2008 09:02 PM Permalink
ha ha, LKA a statesman. Nice joke. Statesman goes around in a rath yatra promising death and destruction lol. Advani, Hitler etc are indeed statesmen.
RE:technocrat versus politician!
by mohammed safiuddin on Jul 11, 2008 08:57 PM Permalink
yes, and the spine got further straightened in the august presence of the body of Quaid-e-Azam in Karachi.
RE:technocrat versus politician!
by Braveheart on Jul 11, 2008 08:55 PM Permalink
tats the sad state of this country...majority want such a person to be PM bcoz of whose actions uncountable ppl are killed ...
Dear Friends, Congress as a party cannot muster all the required seats is very clear after all the issues faced by poor man's india or common man's india. Even if it comes to power by God's will, who will be the next PM ... Dr. Manmohan Singh or Rahul Gandhi??? Also UPA is a fractured coalition & beyond any treatment. Third front will only come into existence during the next Preseidential election :).... in case they manage to bring it to existence & they muster the 270-280 nos...who will be the PM in that case ... Deve Gowda??? Atleast BJP led NDA has proven their stability & to last for 5 years....we atleast know who will be the PM if BJP led NDA wins...transparency is very important in a democracy dear friends....as regards to Advani's personality (i feel)....a non-corrupt leader amongst the very few left today... able administrator....stands by his words from Ayodhya to Jinnah and till date....guess he is the most eligible PM....common friends...let us accept the reality and atleast vote for a stable government... after all it is the tax payer's money which will again go into these elections & then again the inflation....
RE:RE:Most eligible PM of India
by Pratap Dubey on Jul 11, 2008 09:08 PM Permalink
Dear Nandan, Its an irony that you are calling this person Advani "a non-corrupt leader and reliable leader". This is the same Advani who came to power in te name of RAM and after coming to POWER just enjoyed his stay in Dehli. This is d same BJP wose Party President was caugt on te Television wile accepting Bribe of 2 lakhs. This is te same NDA which did te worst scandal "Kafan Chor" (George Fernandes). So Dear friends please use your own brain before blindly voting for BJP.
RE:Most eligible PM of India
by Dinesh on Jul 11, 2008 09:22 PM Permalink
Dear pratap, do you know the corruption history of the congies, whose presidents were great indiragandhi, Rajive gandhi sonia gandhi etc.?
RE:Most eligible PM of India
by Saurabh Vyas on Jul 11, 2008 08:45 PM Permalink
Sorry mate but i disagree, 1)the govt gave away about 25 billion in farmer's debt, 2) inflation to 2 digits and economic growth down to 7%. 3) 49.5% reservation. 4) The nuclear deal was bound to happen anyway. I think it is the only good decision that has been made in this govt tenure.
Apart from that no major policies, absolutely nothing. And about Sonia Gandhi being a PM. Did anyone think of the fact that both Indira Gandhi n Rajov Gandhi were assassinated. I think this was d major reason fro her stepping down from the PM post rather than making a so called SACRIFICE.
RE:Most eligible PM of India
by Dinesh on Jul 11, 2008 08:58 PM Permalink
Congress is a minority appeasement party. It doesnt act opon islamic terrorists. The nuclear deal may be signed even afterwards. But if the life goes by this no action on terrorists, the life cannot be brought back. So the congress is more dangerous to the nation than the benifits from nuclear deal. Therefore the congress must go first.
