RE:Feroz last name was Gandhy not gandhi.
by arkit on Oct 03, 2007 09:26 PM Permalink
donot speak like a dunkey. Don't forget u have a head and respect it.
RE:Feroz last name was Gandhy not gandhi.
by Srinivas on Oct 03, 2007 09:28 PM Permalink
Arkit you don't sepak junk. Because of people like you Britsh ruled us and now Italy iis ruling us.
RE:RE:Feroz last name was Gandhy not gandhi.
by arkit on Oct 03, 2007 09:31 PM Permalink
british nehi ate to India mullha country bon jate. Iran, iraq jaisa ek country hota
RE:Feroz last name was Gandhy not gandhi.
by Reddy Reddy on Oct 03, 2007 09:28 PM Permalink
u lost ur mind. know the truths.. Just google it you will find lot about it..
RE:Feroz last name was Gandhy not gandhi.
by arkit on Oct 03, 2007 09:30 PM Permalink
what rubbish r u talking. Don't act like a dumb. I am not a great fan of her. But this is not the way to act. Surname comes from marriage for Indian woman like our mother, sisters get and so does she
RE:Feroz last name was Gandhy not gandhi.
by vidhya tharangini on Oct 03, 2007 09:41 PM Permalink
http://www.slideshare.net/thakurs/indira-gandhi-and-rajiv-gandhi
RE:RE:Feroz last name was Gandhy not gandhi.
by vidhya tharangini on Oct 03, 2007 09:45 PM Permalink
Rajivs Fathername is Feroze Khan and his grand mother was Parsie who converted herself to muslim after marriage and carried Khan as her last name. Feroze Khan (Rajiv's father) got his name changed to Gandhi (though Parsie mother who got converted to muslim had her family name as Gandhy) at the time of marriage to Indira Gandhi.
As the president of main opposition party, please talk sensible. Country is faciing millions of technical problems. Why not highlight those issues rather than some cheap publicity stunt?
I am not a big supporter of Congress or Sonia. But It is pertinent that Rajnath, the BJP chief is crazy. Gandhi was a Gujarati and Sonia's husband side is Parsi--because of which she has inherited the Surname Gandhi! BJP should do their homework properly. They have lost the Rule and now they are losing thier heads too!!
RE:Sonia Gandhi
by Srinivas on Oct 03, 2007 09:22 PM Permalink
Hari its notning to with name. Its Gandhis RAM faith which is questioned by Congress and Karunandhi.
How can they go for strike being in Governmen? Why can't CPIM control prices? Its stupdity that CPIM is putting blame on Congress and trying to escape. If CPIM can't control price let them come out of the government. That they can't do because they are having power hinger and dn't want to loose central power. for CPIM more then price rise the power is important. The strike is I wash
Congress dont like to spend even a single rupee on education just because once people get educated then they will know the truth and they will never vote for them. All uneducated people in villages think that these so called sucking sonia/rahul gandhis are related to mahamtma and voting for them. Once they came to know that these guys are cheating just using gandhi name they will kick them to italy. From nehru to sonia all are doing same things always talk about reservations etc and dont spend money on education they want everyone uneducated so that they can be in power. Lallu did the samething for bihar.. And communists sucks in a big way..
RE:Answer this: How many Xtians fought for the freedom struggle?
by Reddy Reddy on Oct 03, 2007 09:07 PM Permalink
Britishers were Xians so they had fun at time. Now asking for reservations. Mulsims had fun when muslim kings were ruling india.. and now they want reservation..
RE:Answer this: How many Xtians fought for the freedom struggle?
by Reuben on Oct 03, 2007 09:11 PM Permalink
Okay...before you report me for abuse much like how you have been treating minorities in India read this article....
RE:Answer this: How many Xtians fought for the freedom struggle?
by Srinivas on Oct 03, 2007 09:13 PM Permalink
Ruben can you also read how christians are treating Mulsims in the world
RE:RE:Answer this: How many Xtians fought for the freedom struggle?
by Reuben on Oct 03, 2007 09:15 PM Permalink
What the hell does that have to do with what we are talking about? This discussion is not about who is better. It is just that minorities were illtreated by Brahmin and upper caste scum for 1000s of yeats.
RE:RE:RE:Answer this: How many Xtians fought for the freedom struggle?
by Srinivas on Oct 03, 2007 09:18 PM Permalink
Reuben don't show your dirty colours. . Don't spread your false propoganda. All the states in India is ruled by non Brahmins. This its self shows you guys want to keep caste in nation. Because it benifits for minorities
RE:Answer this: How many Xtians fought for the freedom struggle?
by Reuben on Oct 03, 2007 09:14 PM Permalink
Which freedom struggle are you talking about? More than freedom from the british, we got freedom from Brahmin scum. Democracy was a bonus we got in 1947
RE:RE:Answer this: How many Xtians fought for the freedom struggle?
by Srinivas on Oct 03, 2007 09:15 PM Permalink
Idiot Reuben demacracy was not bonus its faught with blood and obtained. How can you understand because you are british mouth piece.
RE:Answer this: How many Xtians fought for the freedom struggle?
by Reuben on Oct 03, 2007 09:18 PM Permalink
How can you understand what I am saying you are not a minority......You had everything money education power and the gods. You could manipulate everyone. We had nothing for us democracy was not just freedom from Britishers but also from the upper caste morons. Get back to reality pal.
RE:RE:Answer this: How many Xtians fought for the freedom struggle?
by Srinivas on Oct 03, 2007 09:20 PM Permalink
Wash your clours first and stop screaming caste. There are lot of chief ministers and political leaders are form backward so your false propogand will not work
RE:Answer this: How many Xtians fought for the freedom struggle?
by vinay thakur on Oct 03, 2007 09:50 PM Permalink
Rouben,without proper knowledge and reasoning dont put all blame on brahmins!Ancient hindu society was job oriented and not education!British introduced their own education system in india to get better clerks.Still today we send our children to school so that he might have a job in future!
Ancient hindu society..Brahmins were educated but majority(90%) were poor and survived on begging!According to the caste every section of the society was ensured jobs!You are talking if Brahmins got their kids educated and put them as officers in the country!!
Those days Dalits were better off than today even after 60yrs of reservation policy!
Go to any villege and see how many households got benefit of reservation!At one hand Congress kept promoting companies like BATA and more and more Dalits lost their jobs!At least 60yrs ago Cobblers could sell their shoes!!How many cobblers you see today in india??Did all of them got reservation and working in govt??
RE:Answer this: How many Xtians fought for the freedom struggle?
by Kumar Diwakar on Oct 04, 2007 01:40 AM Permalink
Vinay,
This is totally non-sense to say the condition of dalit people was better before implementation of reservation. Caste system is a curse to Hindu society, which provides upper caste peoples an excuse to exploit weaker section/lower caste people. Now these days majority of exploiters are from non-Brahmin but certainly from upper caste. Even today you can find instances where lower caste students are prevented attending classes any any pre-text or even murdered.. Yes there are some flaws with criteria and implementation of reservation but there should be certainly an affirmative policy that includes not only caste but also financial and social background.
RE:They are just using gandhi surname for votes
by Pat Thakur on Oct 03, 2007 09:05 PM Permalink
Same old story over & over again. Only we can change it in the forthcoming elections, if we wish that is..........
RE:They are just using gandhi surname for votes
by Tamilan on Oct 03, 2007 09:11 PM Permalink
Why do BJP worry about Gandhi ?? ..A RSS fanatic Gotse Killed Gandhi
RE:They are just using gandhi surname for votes
by Reddy Reddy on Oct 03, 2007 09:15 PM Permalink
Who ever killed he did a good thing otherwise by this we would be part of pakistan.
RE:They are just using gandhi surname for votes
by Reddy Reddy on Oct 03, 2007 09:24 PM Permalink
Whoever killed but someone shuould shoot this Karma nidhi. He is burden to india.
RE:They are just using gandhi surname for votes
by Milind on Oct 04, 2007 02:04 AM Permalink
Tamilian,
What has BJP got to do with Godse ? BJP was not formed then. You want to put all Hindus in one basket ? This would be like saying all "All muslims are terrorists" or "All which is wrong.
she aint using Mahatama Gandhi's surname! she uses the name of feroz gandhi the father of sanjay and rajiv!and the husband of indira! what the hell LOL what this name has to do with R G M Gandhi? nothing! stupid Rajnath singh fooling people !!
RE:Gandhi from Rajgopal Mohan Gandhi?
by Reddy Reddy on Oct 03, 2007 09:24 PM Permalink
Feroz last name was Gandhy not gandhi. Go to google and check it out..
RE:Gandhi from Rajgopal Mohan Gandhi?
by Roti Kapada Makhan on Oct 03, 2007 09:19 PM Permalink
Hello all stupid narrow minded Indians and shits, why on earth you blame Sonia whene your country is the poorest in whole universe and full of thieves and corrupt politicians and millions of beggers. Indians are today due to what British did and BJP is NOTHING but a radical Hindu extermists who are terrorists to kill muslims and Christians in India without realizing that they are also Indians, sucks for you though, you bloody Indians really.I think India will NEVER be powerful and honest Nation in the world with 99.9% on poverty, 99,9% on corruption and 99,9% on radical and racist attitude. Thanks for reading, I am Nicholas Charles from London
RE:Gandhi from Rajgopal Mohan Gandhi?
by Reddy Reddy on Oct 03, 2007 09:01 PM Permalink
for your info Feroz is a muslim and his sur name is not gandhi. If u dont know the truth just keep quite.
RE:Gandhi from Rajgopal Mohan Gandhi?
by Praveen Varma on Oct 03, 2007 09:07 PM Permalink
for your information, feroz gandhi is not a muslik but a parsi hence the surname gandhi. I the advise to you is the same which you advised in yiour reply - keep quiet.
RE:RE:Gandhi from Rajgopal Mohan Gandhi?
by Reddy Reddy on Oct 03, 2007 09:17 PM Permalink
Praveen, http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061007072024AAqOvzS
RE:Gandhi from Rajgopal Mohan Gandhi?
by Reddy Reddy on Oct 03, 2007 09:16 PM Permalink
Pravee, muslim or parsi but his surname spelling is not gandhi go and check..
RE:Gandhi from Rajgopal Mohan Gandhi?
by Bon Jovi on Oct 03, 2007 09:21 PM Permalink
I am from pakistan but not ignorant in history! Feroz is a Parsi name as well!! like Sarah is christian muslim name! Praveen VArma ur country fella has clarified it! It was in news that Feroz had accepted islam as well!just a news that my indian frnd told me! but she has allt he right to use Gandhi as her name!like indira did and rajiv sanjay! now y BJP that think even Gandhi was a scum bag be sio ferocious in saying "he believed so should all" It makes me laff how subcontinent politicians make people stupid!
RE:Gandhi from Rajgopal Mohan Gandhi?
by Praveen Varma on Oct 03, 2007 09:13 PM Permalink
Also, kindly read the article clearly, what Rajnath is saying Gandhiji believed in Ram, so if congress are supposed to be followers of gandhiji then they should believe in Ram. Rajnath is here being only being opportunist.
RE:RE:RE:Gandhi from Rajgopal Mohan Gandhi?
by Reddy Reddy on Oct 03, 2007 09:22 PM Permalink
Praveen, Feroz last name was Gandhy not gandhi. Go to google and check it out..
