the CM of tamil nadu KARUNANIDHI is making reference to lord rama being a fiction, but the same CM when we was in opposition for 15years during MGRs rule as CM, had in one of his public meetings has referred to the same lord stating that my VANVAS to power/CM is greater than that of lord ramas vanvas of 14 years, had he gained wisdom or has he lost with age, the people of tamil nadu and india have to judge by throwing him out of power.
the CM of tamil nadu KARUNANIDHI is making reference to lord rama being a fiction, but the same CM when we was in opposition for 15years during MGRs rule as CM, had in one of his public meetings has referred to the same lord stating that my VANVAS to power/CM is greater than that of lord ramas vanvas of 14 years, had he gained wisdom or has he lost with age, the people of tamil nadu and india have to judge by throwing him out of power.
the CM of tamil nadu KARUNANIDHI is making reference to lord rama being a fiction, but the same CM when we was in opposition for 15years during MGRs rule as CM, had in one of his public meetings has referred to the same lord stating that my VANVAS to power/CM is greater than that of lord ramas vanvas of 14 years, had he gained wisdom or has he lost with age, the people of tamil nadu and india have to judge by throwing him out of power.
RE:Puthiya Bharatham
by LAGIDU on Oct 01, 2007 02:30 PM Permalink
Sorna mani, we understand your caliber. Get back to your lemuria under water. Your PUthiya only belongs there and not in Bharat.
Wat is this idiotic order from SC. We hgave lots of examples,b y not following SC order in past. You want me to say some Example.
1. Periyar Dam Issue. Even SC order to increase the hight of the Dam, wat Kerala Gov. Did. Can SC ask the Central Gov. to dismiss the kerala Gov? Why the SC still did not talk abt this? If we ask, they will say, this problem is still in court? How may decades it eill be in court? If the SC has Gurts, let them ask ti dismiss the Kerala Gov. ASAP 2. The same story in Karnataka, SC order to release the water of 190DCM, But wat happened, still not following, again appiled to SC by Karnataka Gov. Why this SC not dismissed karnataka Gov.
So watever gudgement the SC said, other than TN, no need to follow, but the TN should follow. Wat a idiotic order??
The Kerala and Karnataka Gov. appilled again to the SC, even the SC has taken these cases again to relook. My Qn is, why the SC has taken these two cases again, IS the SC feel that, the order is wrong, thats y SC has taken again, If so, the judges are not a good judges and can send them out ASAP, so how we can understand, the order given againest Mr.Karunanidhi is right, So as a India citizen, shold we think , these judgements are just Eye wash??????????????? Lots of Qns to SC???????? Plz save india.
RE:TN bandh: Supreme Court pans govt for flouting order
by LaX Ray on Oct 01, 2007 03:45 PM Permalink
mind your words when you speak about supreme court.
RE:TN bandh: Supreme Court pans govt for flouting order
by uddagiri sekhar on Oct 01, 2007 02:27 PM Permalink
"the same judiciary comes very hard against the reservation"
Again a clear case of political parties misleading people for their narrow political gains. If you are educated enough, you must be knowing that SC asked for basis of giving reservations to OBC's with statastics of 1940's.It only asked for justification of grounds on which govt considers the total OBC's population in India requires 30 % reservation.
Such a major decision which is not taken based on proper concenses can lead to large scale disbalance in the country. And also there is every chance that a political pary can misuse this power of reservation for their political gains. So there is definitely a need for transparency in such issues. SC asked for the same.
RE:RE:RE:TN bandh: Supreme Court pans govt for flouting order
by uddagiri sekhar on Oct 01, 2007 02:28 PM Permalink
\"the same judiciary comes very hard against the reservation\"
Again a clear case of political parties misleading people for their narrow political gains. If you are educated enough, you must be knowing that SC asked for basis of giving reservations to OBC\'s with statastics of 1940\'s.It only asked for justification of grounds on which govt considers the total OBC\'s population in India requires 30 % reservation.
Such a major decision which is not taken based on proper concenses can lead to large scale disbalance in the country. And also there is every chance that a political pary can misuse this power of reservation for their political gains. So there is definitely a need for transparency in such issues. SC asked for the same.
RE:TN bandh: Supreme Court pans govt for flouting order
by jayasimha on Oct 01, 2007 02:25 PM Permalink
there is a rule stating bandhs are illegal--hence its contempt--secondly which self respecting govt declares a bandh in its own state--the loyal DMK thugs will come out, burn a few buses, burn a few people, indulge in violence and loot, desecrate a few temples and what not. Since the public will be inconvenienced, it is the duty of the govt of the day to protect the life & property of its citizens--not indulge in rowdyism which is the hall mark of the DMK. Wouls suggest you sit and watch a few loyal channels and keep quite.
RE:RE:RE:RE:TN bandh: Supreme Court pans govt for flouting order
by uddagiri sekhar on Oct 01, 2007 02:28 PM Permalink
\\\"the same judiciary comes very hard against the reservation\\\"
Again a clear case of political parties misleading people for their narrow political gains. If you are educated enough, you must be knowing that SC asked for basis of giving reservations to OBC\\\'s with statastics of 1940\\\'s.It only asked for justification of grounds on which govt considers the total OBC\\\'s population in India requires 30 % reservation.
Such a major decision which is not taken based on proper concenses can lead to large scale disbalance in the country. And also there is every chance that a political pary can misuse this power of reservation for their political gains. So there is definitely a need for transparency in such issues. SC asked for the same.
RE:RE:TN bandh: Supreme Court pans govt for flouting order
by uddagiri sekhar on Oct 01, 2007 02:27 PM Permalink
"the same judiciary comes very hard against the reservation"
Again a clear case of political parties misleading people for their narrow political gains. If you are educated enough, you must be knowing that SC asked for basis of giving reservations to OBC's with statastics of 1940's.It only asked for justification of grounds on which govt considers the total OBC's population in India requires 30 % reservation.
Such a major decision which is not taken based on proper concenses can lead to large scale disbalance in the country. And also there is every chance that a political pary can misuse this power of reservation for their political gains. So there is definitely a need for transparency in such issues. SC asked for the same.
RE:RE:RE:RE:TN bandh: Supreme Court pans govt for flouting order
by jayasimha on Oct 01, 2007 02:27 PM Permalink
there is a rule stating bandhs are illegal--hence its contempt--secondly which self respecting govt declares a bandh in its own state--the loyal DMK thugs will come out, burn a few buses, burn a few people, indulge in violence and loot, desecrate a few temples and what not. Since the public will be inconvenienced, it is the duty of the govt of the day to protect the life & property of its citizens--not indulge in rowdyism which is the hall mark of the DMK. Wouls suggest you sit and watch a few loyal channels and keep quite.
RE:RE:RE:TN bandh: Supreme Court pans govt for flouting order
by jayasimha on Oct 01, 2007 02:26 PM Permalink
there is a rule stating bandhs are illegal--hence its contempt--secondly which self respecting govt declares a bandh in its own state--the loyal DMK thugs will come out, burn a few buses, burn a few people, indulge in violence and loot, desecrate a few temples and what not. Since the public will be inconvenienced, it is the duty of the govt of the day to protect the life & property of its citizens--not indulge in rowdyism which is the hall mark of the DMK. Wouls suggest you sit and watch a few loyal channels and keep quite.
RE:RE:TN bandh: Supreme Court pans govt for flouting order
by jayasimha on Oct 01, 2007 02:26 PM Permalink
there is a rule stating bandhs are illegal--hence its contempt--secondly which self respecting govt declares a bandh in its own state--the loyal DMK thugs will come out, burn a few buses, burn a few people, indulge in violence and loot, desecrate a few temples and what not. Since the public will be inconvenienced, it is the duty of the govt of the day to protect the life & property of its citizens--not indulge in rowdyism which is the hall mark of the DMK. Wouls suggest you sit and watch a few loyal channels and keep quite.
RE:Indian judiciary - mostly with RSS background
by uddagiri sekhar on Oct 01, 2007 02:17 PM Permalink
Hi Amol,
Don't you see that not respecting SC verdict is failure of constitution in the state. Is declaration of Bandh by a ruling state govt, a filmsy thing for you?
Here is the logic for you. How can a govt in power call for bandh on any issue? Some one having power to change things( In DMK's case it hold for Union govt as well) calling for bandh on some issue is purely illegal. A party/govt in rule is calling for bandh against a party which is not in power. Isin't that ridiculous. Won't the state affairs and duties get affected on these filmsy grounds?
More over Mr.Karunanidhi is calling this bandh for his personal reasons. BJP party workers and DMK workers had clashed with each other.So is this call for bandh.
RE:RE:Indian judiciary - mostly with RSS background
by uddagiri sekhar on Oct 01, 2007 02:25 PM Permalink
"the same judiciary comes very hard against the reservation"
Again a clear case of political parties misleading people for their narrow political gains. If you are educated enough, you must be knowing that SC asked for basis of giving reservations to OBC's with statastics of 1940's.It only asked for justification of grounds on which govt considers the total OBC's population in India requires 30 % reservation.
Such a major decision which is not taken based on proper concenses can lead to large scale disbalance in the country. And also there is every chance that a political pary can misuse this power of reservation for their political gains. So there is definitely a need for transparency in such issues. SC asked for the same.
It has often been observed that TN governments were undisciplined towards national policies. For their narrow political gains they don't mind toppling the Union governments.Let that be DMK or AIADMK.
It's been the mindset of people of TN with strong regional feelings and language barriers, which never let any national party to step in to state politics.This is a bad signal for the stability of National governance.
I think first the people have to change to bring these narrow party leaders to respect Indian constitution.
Not respecting SC judgement by a responsible entity such as state govt is height of disrespect. It has happened so in military ruled nations like pak during musraf rule, Hitler rule of Germany and now in Tamil nadu.
RE:It's has always been the case with TN govt.
by Ayyappan Venkatesan on Oct 01, 2007 02:31 PM Permalink
hello what do you about TN & Tamil people. Go and see the situation in Bihar or other states. The bandh was observed by TN Govt. to protest against the hurdles towards implementing the Sethu Project. For a good cause. Pl. dont compare Pakistan or Hitlers rule with this.
RE:It's has always been the case with TN govt.
by Ayyappan Venkatesan on Oct 01, 2007 02:33 PM Permalink
hello what do you about TN & Tamil people. Go and see the situation in Bihar or other states. The bandh was observed by TN Govt. to protest against the hurdles towards implementing the Sethu Project. For a good cause. Pl. dont compare Pakistan or Hitlers rule with this.
RE:RE:It's has always been the case with TN govt.
by uddagiri sekhar on Oct 01, 2007 02:45 PM Permalink
So TN can be comparision goes with states like Bihar?
Once again I say this. How can a party in power ( ruling govt) call for bandh on any issue. In the case of DMK, it's even holding power in Union govt.Isin't that ridiculous. This is completely illegal even from a simple logical point of view also.
The actual reason is that DMK want's to extract importance out of this situation (same case with BJP as well, though).So openely there is a failure of constitution, is not at all excusable.
RE:It's has always been the case with TN govt.
by uddagiri sekhar on Oct 01, 2007 02:44 PM Permalink
So TN can be comparision goes with states like Bihar?
Once again I say this. How can a party in power ( ruling govt) call for bandh on any issue. In the case of DMK, it's even holding power in Union govt.Isin't that ridiculous. This is completely illegal even from a simple logical point of view also.
The actual reason is that DMK want's to extract importance out of this situation (same case with BJP as well, though).So openely there is a failure of constitution, is not at all excusable.
No doubt about it .Otherwise how to explain the fact that Natural Extension of the Land on the Indian side is EXACTLY joined to the Natural Extension on the Lankan Side? Also this is the SHORTEST POSSIBLE between the two lands. If it is 'Natural" one could as well assume a "any house in a city " is Naturally formed ,that is,if you calculate the probability and Coincidences in this case .
Again,according to reports that came in Rediff in July end,the chemistry/constitution of the boulders found on the Sethu does not represent that of the surrounding marine geology. The boulders have constitution resembling that is found in the LAND farther inside. Kilometers of Boulders laid on the bridge to connect two natural protrusions of India and Lanka with the LEAST EFFORT PRINCIPLE (ie to reduce labor by connecting the land extension which will bridge the shortest distance) IS DEFINITELY THE RESULT OF WELL CONSIDERED PLANS THAT ONLY HUMANS CAN THINK OF.
Hence the MOST SCIENTIFIC Conclusion: RAM SETHU IS MAN MADE. ANY MUD HEADED CHALLENGERS ???
RE:RE:RAM SETHU IS MAN MADE!!!
by Gopi Menon on Oct 01, 2007 04:37 PM Permalink
See the rediff interview with the ASI scientist explaing the differnce between the nature of the boulders from that in the surrounding see.
See Google earth map of the Sethu to find out how silly is the argument that the two land extensions got connected EXACTLY by a "natural" accumulation of earthen mass that too at the "SHORTEST DISTANCE " PART !!!
