Complete gibberish ... full of opinions and hash theories. I am keen to hear B Raman and such other enlightened analysts on this. Certainly, BENAZIR is NOT incomparabale ... may be within Pakistan, but not otherwise. She fuelled anti-Indian sentiments in POK ... you must have heard her speech in POK, shouting Azadi. She sounded like one of those maniacs. Just becoz she died in tragic circumstances does NOT make her either a saint or one that needs to be made virtuous. Sins have to be paid for, sometimes in the most cruel manner and this is possibly one such instance.
Kemal Ataturk fashioned Turkey several decades ago and I am yet to find one moderate Islamic state anywhere in the world today. Moderation in practice of Islam is unheard of, at least not in the last decade. And Pakistan will never be a moderate state, not in the next 100 years. Born of violence and lived through 60 years of violence, they see only violence everywhere. Sad state of affairs.
RE:Mush NOT responsible for the death of Benazir
by Desi on Jan 01, 2008 04:42 AM Permalink
You hit the nail on its head! You should be writing articles for rediff instead of those jokers working out here!!
RE:RE:Mush NOT responsible for the death of Benazir
by prabu on Dec 31, 2007 09:19 PM Permalink
You are absolutely right,its difficult to understand y indian media is generationg sympathy wave for her...
Late Mr.Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, while he was the Prime Minister of Pakistan had declared a 1000year war against India. Later when Mrs. Benazir Bhutto became the Prime Minister, she had reiterated the same 1000year war against India.
Though the common men in Pakistan may not have anything against India, the leaders in Pakistan have always been against India. It is reported that major portion of grants received from foreign countries, were used by Pakistan for procuring arms and ammunition. And a good portion of these arms and ammunition used to reach terrorists to carry-out terrorist and subversive activities in India.
Pakistan has never conducted itself as a good neighboring country and probably will never be interested in becoming a good neighbor, largely due to its leaders like Gen.Mushraff, Late Mrs.Benazir Bhutto, Late Mr.Zulfikr Ali Bhutto, Mr.Nawaj Shariff and military top brass like Gen Yahya Khan and others.
Though we need not rejoice death of Mrs.Benazir Bhutto, there is no need to shed tears.
RE:RE:WHY MOURN MRS. BENAZIR'S DEATH
by VSR on Dec 31, 2007 09:46 PM Permalink
These Bhuttos, whether father or daughter, was not friend of India. One waged war and the other funded Kashmiri militants. And our media and politicians talk about these people as friends only to get sympathy and support from muslims in India. By the way, what is this crap about, Mr.. Mrs... General... Nonsense, none of them deserve any respect for what they have done to India.
RE:WHY MOURN MRS. BENAZIR'S DEATH
by mohammed ali on Dec 31, 2007 09:42 PM Permalink
one thing is clear, enemy of india is funding pakistan. thats why which ever leader sits in the throne is forced to speak against india. common people has nothing against india. they are being made scape goats and are used. even now who ever sits in the throne will be forced and will do the same whatever has happend, there is no ending until the fundng stops.
RE:WHY MOURN MRS. BENAZIR'S DEATH
by a c on Dec 31, 2007 09:25 PM Permalink
Well said ! Her death is tragic but then that's it.All pakistani leaders have been hostile towards India and she was no exception.It's difficult for me to understand why the so-called secularists and so-called liberals in media & politics are engaged in a shameless "syaapa".Let it remain their personal affair & concentrate on the development of our country.Dead or alive,she or any pakistani leader would only have contributed to our problems on the front of terrorism,border issues,bigotry and suspect loyalty.
RE:WHY MOURN MRS. BENAZIR'S DEATH
by observer on Dec 31, 2007 09:04 PM Permalink
thats fine if it was said 1000 years of war,,,,,,, in those years do u know how many more BHUTTO'S will die the same cruel death ...........
i dont see the point. unless ISI is significantly weakened, there's no point in any kind of war on terror. US funds that are granted to pakistan army are routed thru ISI to any terror outfit all over the world against any country. unless ISI is stopped , we arent seeing any change in terrorism levels all over the world. ever.
What is the evidence of lack of complicity of Musharraf? Stop calling this cut and paste gibberish an article. Bisht is opining and not very intelligently. Changing storyline, no autopsy (Medicolegal autopsy cannot be refused by next of kin), precollected X-rays (now that BB has been shown hit by gunshot the X-rays shown by spokesperson revealing no bullet wound, seem collected in advance from some other case) and lack of adequate security (2-3 men get into innermost circle with 4 Kg RDX and 2 pistols) point toward definite complicity of Musharraf by design and not omission.
RE:Gibberish is not an article
by observer on Dec 31, 2007 08:50 PM Permalink
angelfire dot com slash a14 slash terror slash musharraf dot htm ....... unbelievable
If Fidel Castro dies tragically tomorrow, will Americans get emotional, cry in support & praise him? For all her positive qualities, Bhutto was ANTI-INDIAN and wanted to kill Indians in Kashmir and in all other places. That's the true history.
RE:Hypothetical Question
by raj on Dec 31, 2007 08:43 PM Permalink
true. bhutto's records arent clean, just because she died a violent death, we need not sympathize along with her supporters. we need to however see pakistan getting back to democratic ways, with their people getting freedom to come up, like any others in the world. if they are happy, we are happy.
RE:Hypothetical Question
by a c on Dec 31, 2007 09:32 PM Permalink
We have nothing to do with their happiness or the lack of it.When will we understand that ignoring them & focusing whole-heartedly on our progress,our development is the only recipe for our nation to carve a niche for itself ? Let's face it..this confused approach about pakistan has always been responsible for our problems.Till the time the hindus get rid of this "lijlijapan",nothing positive will happen.
RE:Hypothetical Question
by Hanuman Mall Gulgulia on Dec 31, 2007 09:37 PM Permalink
what a ludcurous it is! In democratic country Chairman/President of a political party is not installed by WILL of leader since deceased . In India after the assassination of Mrs. Indira Gandhi the Indian National Congress elected Rahul Gandhi as Party President. PPP is not a personal property of any individual that it can be bequeathed. Best thing would have been better if Mr. Bilawal Bhutto Zardari had been formally elected as the Chairman of PPP.
Please can you read the book "Deception" - The story of Pakistan's Nuclear Program. Parvez Musharraf was responsible for the rise of many groups such as the Lashkar-E-Toiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad as well as several sectarian Sunni extremist outfits
RE:Enough news on Benazir, the Anti-India Politician
by a c on Dec 31, 2007 09:35 PM Permalink
Correct and that too through a very hollow,superficial article,devoid of any substance.
All the four families whci author talks have made politics(ruling respective countires) as their family business and thereby amassing lot of wealth, also they have paid heavy price for misdeeds comitted by them knowingly or unknowingly
RE:Why Musharraf is not responsible for Benazir's death
by Narender Singh on Dec 31, 2007 08:24 PM Permalink
You are very right. these families have done nothing for the countries except amassing wealth for their 100 generations to come. God is great. You have to pay a price for every thing. Nothing comes free. One has to pay for the misdeeds sooner or later.
