I agree partially with Sunil here. Greg got a reasonably performing team and failed to improve it. Yes players perform in the field, but that is just an execution of strategy made by players and management. Greg could win the respect of only 2 players out of 15 selected to the team. There was fundamentally something wrong in his approach, he failed to understand India and team India. Of course he is not the only one failed in making the winning team, selectors, board, players and all other decision makers have to go through the filter to identify the faults.
RE:Gavaskar against Chappell
by Sarnath Kannan on Apr 23, 2007 10:28 AM Permalink
Indian team was too skewed for a straight-thinking Greg. Thats the reason for the mishap.
RE:Gavaskar against Chappell
by Suman Bhat on Apr 23, 2007 11:09 AM Permalink
that contributed to our losses against Bangladesh and Sri Lanka." http://worldcup.indiatimes.com/It_was_all_about_attitude_feels_BCCI/articleshow/1839620.cms both ex captain superstare would have fought battle on WI ground rather than calling shots form ind dressing room. Why Ind media so called reilable sources are not getting access to chappels report
RE:RE:Gavaskar against Chappell
by Maha Stud on Apr 23, 2007 11:27 AM Permalink
"Why Ind media so called reilable sources are not getting access to chappels report"
~~ as usual to application of grey matter .... chappal submited a CD (another super move ) .... n NOT in papers, which wud hav made easy for media to access it
