Why such details are not publiced by Media. Has BCCI purchased media also? I would like to put on board , the records of players as given here in 2006-2007( ODI)
:Unfortunate Selection by Peeyush xxxxxxxxx Maheshwari on Apr 21, 2007 10:36 AM Yes you are right letus have a look at last one year performance (Mar 2006 to Mar 2007)of our top batsmans:
RE:How the politics is killing Indian cricket due to regional & politics of BCCI
by Rationalist on Apr 21, 2007 05:02 PM Permalink
How you think makes me laugh.Raw Statistics is of no use till you dont know how to analyse it. Siddu keeps uttering this"I lean over statistics like a drunkard leans over a lamppost, only support not for illumination". The negative circket that Ganguly played in worldcup cannot not be seen in your statistics. Till world cup he was playing possitive circket. But once worldcup started he changed colours. Also the position one bats also affects the average & lot of other factors. And Pathan's economy rate was between 6.5-7 runs per over in his last 15 matches & he cant bat against quality pace or spin bowling. What do you intend to do with such players?
RE:How the politics is killing Indian cricket due to regional & politics of BCCI
by harrycheema on Apr 21, 2007 11:35 PM Permalink
what do u know about positive and negative cricket? when no player is willing to stay on the wicket,wether holding one end is a negative cricket. If yes then you are excusing 10 players for not staying at the wicket and criticising the player,who is staying at the wicket and scoring,for playing negatively.shame on people like you for making such a stupid analysis.For people like u if Ganguli had scored 20 runs of 15 to 20 balls and got out, it would have been a positive cricket and the result-- India all out for 120 runs. And what the positive cricket of Dravid was doing? Can u highlight any contribution of Dravid in world cup either as a batsman or as a captain.
RE:[object]
by harrycheema on Apr 21, 2007 11:43 PM Permalink
Dear Rationalist. Really happy to see how rationalist u r. what do u know about positive and negative cricket? when no player is willing to stay on the wicket,wether holding one end is a negative cricket. If yes then you are excusing 10 players for not staying at the wicket and criticising the player,who is staying at the wicket and scoring,for playing negatively.shame on people like you for making such a stupid analysis.For people like u if Ganguli had scored 20 runs of 15 to 20 balls and got out, it would have been a positive cricket and the result-- India all out for 120 runs. And what the positive cricket of Dravid was doing? Can u highlight any contribution of Dravid in world cup either as a batsman or as a captain.
RE:How the politics is killing Indian cricket due to regional & politics of BCCI
by aatank on Apr 21, 2007 01:41 PM Permalink
why are you living with these figures, do they matter when BCCI appoints captains [these days, new turnaround] or when selectors pick up teams..... they dont, sauravs fault, he performed,how dare he does that?
