what do u know about positive and negative cricket? when no player is willing to stay on the wicket,wether holding one end is a negative cricket. If yes then you are excusing 10 players for not staying at the wicket and criticising the player,who is staying at the wicket and scoring,for playing negatively.shame on people like you for making such a stupid analysis.For people like u if Ganguli had scored 20 runs of 15 to 20 balls and got out, it would have been a positive cricket and the result-- India all out for 120 runs. And what the positive cricket of Dravid was doing? Can u highlight any contribution of Dravid in world cup either as a batsman or as a captain.
