RE:Treaties
by Yaqoot Mir on May 20, 2008 10:52 PM Permalink
INDIA SIGNS-THEN BARGES INTO AREAS WHICH WERE COVERED BY AN AGREEMENT-SIACHEN IS CASE IN POINT.
Dont make it look like you are right and we are wrong. Relax, Siachen and Sir Creek both, Pakistan is going out of its way to ensure that no bad blood exists despite your side balatantly marching into both areas. Sir creek Pakistan has pushed you back after a skirmish and now controls an inch of Indian territory, we call it a bargaining chip, move out of Siachen and we will think about Sir creek, also RUBBISH SUGGESTION by your FM Mountain of peace?. It was a mountain of peace untill you barged in, ALL BETS are off untill you eithdraw. INcident of firing and you guys blaming Pakistan for it, how convenient, days before talks a fabricated incident is reported in the press, NOTHING but pressure tactics my freind.
RE:Treaties
by vaibhav jain on May 20, 2008 10:58 PM Permalink
India proposed a number of cross-LoC initiatives, like doubling the frequency of bus services, launching the truck service and liberalising the permit system, to make the confidence-building measures "more effective".
RE:Treaties
by how often on May 20, 2008 11:27 PM Permalink
he people of Delhi, like Indians elsewhere, live with monumental municipal callousness, resulting in roads and pavements that cave in, manhole covers that go missing and so on. This tolerance must end. Civic authorities must be made accountable for their lapses and the surest way of doing so is to make them %u2014 NDMC, in this case %u2014 pay hefty damages to those who suffer. Penalty must also be imposed on the officials concerned. Normally, while the law is thrown on private sector employees for negligence, sarkari babus go scotfree.
