Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
TADA and not just POTA
by Diler Dogra on Jul 28, 2008 01:34 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

In the past 4 years and after many terrorist attacks Indian police has not been able to solve any terrorist case, not even the deadly 7/11 Mumbai blasts. Police and intelligence organizations are expressing helplessness and frustration. The reason Police say is that we do not have a proper anti-terror law and cannot interrogate or hold terror suspects. They say that fight against terror cannot be fought by Policae alone, Media, Polity and public have to do their part as well. Police was able to arrest some terror suspects but could not solve the case or break in deeper into these organizations. This is leading to unfortunate situation where Terrorists getting bolder and deadlier after each terror act. Mumbai serial blasts case in 1992 was solved because we had TADA that time which helped not just in apprehending the terrorists but also in discouraging any such future event. As a proof no terror act happened after 1992 till the repeal of TADA by congress under pressure of Muslim, pseudo-secular and Human (read muslim) rights organizations. These organizations claim anti-terror laws are against Muslims. Our country does not have an anti-terror law even though there is a UN resolution which mandates each country to set up anti-terrorism laws and even Europe and America have specialized anti-terror laws. Not a single terrorist in J&K has been convicted. In fact PDP-Congress coalition released most of the terrorists and gave them government jobs and monetary compensation c

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:TADA and not just POTA
by Gopal on Jul 28, 2008 11:14 PM   Permalink
The terrorism should not be connected to religions. Treat it as an offence against the NATION. Let there be strict laws to handle the terrorists.

Our rules for policing are framed in accordance with the time of its enactment. The Law depends on the parameters of the offence and offenders. As time pass on and the parameters are changing we must go for amendments to the existing laws. If need be we go for enacting another law. Even a child knows that the parameters of offence and offenders are changed in the last couple of years. One government passed a law according to the parameters prevailed at the time. Next government withdraw the law on some pretext. May be on political reasons. The offender strikes back. Then crying foul. What a political crap? Sanctioning some payments to the family of deceased etc is of no matter after the loss of precious life. Do something to protect the life and property of the citizens for which people elected them. And not to SELL our sovereignty. Initiate measures to stop these carnage. OR do they use this opportunity to process all papers 'to surrender' under the cover of terrorism?

May be the government is trying to include a clause in the 123 agreement empowering a foreign country to handle the terrorism here and protect our life and property. :) Then we can blame that country for the terrorism here:)

There is no announcements regarding any type of new legal approach from the government. Congress men, rise up!! Question your leaders.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Why the terrorists used ammonium nitrate