RE:I DEEPLY CONDEM THE ACT
by All Right on Jul 27, 2008 02:21 PM Permalink
Vote Us and Banish Terror, BJP slogan.
After Jaipur, comes Bangalore - both states ruled by BJP. Today, it is Ahemedabad and in Modi's own constituency. Before that Akshardhaam - Gujarat, another state ruled by BJP. The spin that Modi could stop terror has burst. When the BJP led NDA ruled, the terrorist even had the audacity to attack parliament!
Terrorist have struck two states in two days. If a third blast occurs in the next few days, it is not BJP states, Congress states, Hindu areas, Muslim areas but India that is under attack.
It maybe a time for a national government that encompasses the UPA, NDA, UNPA and the Left. If the situation deterioates further, let such a government declare emergency for 6-12 months and tackle terrorism on a war footing
Now "terrorists" plant low explosives designed not to kill or destruct but symbolic fear. The government hand is suspected.
Why should any terrorist outfit resort to such tactics?
The BJP is smarting from their loss in the Parliament Vote. They went to the extent of enacting an entrapment to pass it of as sting operation to discredit Parliament. Before that their Leader was caught bluffing by Pranab Murkherjee. Analysis of cross-voting showed that the maximum defections came from Karnataka. MPs are jumping of a sinking ship like rats.
They converted Gujarat as a Police State and now sell this Police State to rest of the country as a model. This police state and Modi model has gone Pop
RE:RE:I DEEPLY CONDEM THE ACT
by aman wowz on Jul 27, 2008 02:27 PM Permalink
AGENDA OF BJB ALL OF U KNOW RIGHT >??? WHO HELPED TO DEMOLISH BABRI MASJID MS UMA BHARATHI IS KICKED OUT IS THAT FOR GOD? ONE HISNDU COUNTRY FOR HER AND OTHER COUNTRY FOR BJP ......THEY ARE FOOLING IN THE NAME OF GOD HERE THSES MEN KILL IN THE NAME OF ALLAH ALL ARE SAME NO DIFFERENACE ALL FOR POWER WHO EVER BLINDLY FOLLOW ANY PARTY ARE FOOLS BAN ALL PARTYS EXCEPT 3
RE:RE:RE:I DEEPLY CONDEM THE ACT
by Anti Islamist on Jul 27, 2008 02:50 PM Permalink
What about Agenda of Islam... and Global caliphet,.
if i am right, in post Jaipur blast ... the Islamic demand was to be part of terrorist OIC... rather then be part of secular india and its tradition...
RE:I DEEPLY CONDEM THE ACT
by aman wowz on Jul 27, 2008 02:23 PM Permalink
BROTHER UR WRONG DIDNT KRISHNA ASKED ARJUN TO KIIL DIDNT UR RAM KILLED RAVAN ? IN BIBLE DIDNT MOSES KILL ? DEN WHY CANT ALLAHS PROPHET MOHAMMED CAN OBEY ALLAHS ORDER AND THOSE ORDER TO KILL IT WAS ONLY THAAT TIME NOT NOW
RE:RE:I DEEPLY CONDEM THE ACT
by Anti Islamist on Jul 27, 2008 02:39 PM Permalink
Krishna told, if war is on you... then fight... but heavy weight in his speech was given to speak against supremacy, as well as krishna haven't told Arjuna to kill random unbelievers... rather the war mahabharta was with in a family, in which krishna told for right purpose even stand against your family clan.
before comparing rama and Mohammed, don't forget that where Mohammed war were aggresive, rama war was defensive... Rama haven't asked his army to take lanka's citizens as slaves, he haven't killed men as young as boys becuz they had pubic hairs... and haven't raped womens on same night, as they butchered their families...
Rama-Ravana war was confined to war ground, and not in killing, enslaving or butchering civilians, but this is not true in case of Mohammed...
anyways... Mosses released israelities from slavery from egypt, rama released peoples from ravana, and krishna also released thousands from slaves not only from that under kansa, but also from jarasangh and many others... Mohammed pushed people into slavery..
Mohammed pushed women at lowest in human categorie worth nothing as sex object... krishna lifted them to equality, even by daring to go against society. the 1000 wifes of krishna were sex slaves released that krishna released from jarasnagh, when society failed to give proper respect to them, krishna provided them the honour to be queen ..
so i think, its only mohammed the false prophet.. that supported slavery and supremacism...
RE:I DEEPLY CONDEM THE ACT
by June on Jul 27, 2008 02:25 PM Permalink
Mr. Angry Hindu -- you are strange. When a Muslim does not condemn a terrorist attack, you vilify them, and when they do condemn it you still vilify them! What exactly do you want Muslims to do? Even if for a second we assume that the Prophet was not a great guy, do you want to become yet another Hitler and 'cleanse' out the entire Muslim population in this world? My friend, just as all Hindus are not bad, so are not all Muslims.
RE:RE:I DEEPLY CONDEM THE ACT
by Anti Islamist on Jul 27, 2008 02:48 PM Permalink
you don't need to publish words of "Mein kampf" to give tribute to "Holocaust" victims...
similarly you dont need koranic sura's for such thing, because here its more a act of defending koran, rather then condeming terrorist attack.
so you want to ask, what to do ? then Muslim need to remove hate speeches from koran...
one more thing, Hitler was more close to Muslims then anyone else... and the current Islamist terrorist organisations share a common platform with hitler.... start searching with "Amin al husseini" and "Hassan al banna" or "faqir of Lpi" ....
RE:I DEEPLY CONDEM THE ACT
by Anti Islamist on Jul 27, 2008 02:25 PM Permalink
come on.. he never considered non-muslims as human, rather considered them sub-human. mankind was offered to only believers(aka mohammedians).... so here one more sura... to even brake the myth that jihad is not spritual struggle, rather military advance of fanatic followers of islam...
Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward. -- Surah Nisa (Chapter 4), Verse 95.
RE:I DEEPLY CONDEM THE ACT
by zeeshan zakiuddin on Jul 27, 2008 02:26 PM Permalink
I totally agree with your quotes and like to add that during islamic wars in past it was not the PROPHET(PBUH)who started the wars and it was his opposition. HE too suffered at the hands of terror in those days and HIS family gave up their precious life for mankind. So terrorism is not the way to spread Islam but it will only bring bad name to it and it is totally HIGHWAY TO HELL.....AND ITS GOING TO HAPPEN TO TERRORIST FOR SURE AND EVEN BELOVED PROPHET HAVE CONDEMED SUCH UNJUST ACTS BEFORE ONLY....
RE:RE:I DEEPLY CONDEM THE ACT
by Anti Islamist on Jul 27, 2008 02:43 PM Permalink
One more thing.... koran can't be a peace book...
Bhagwat geeta ends of peace, where end of chapters preaches peace in world... but there is no peace,rather fight prescribed in last chapter of koran....
infact "God the merciful" is missing completly in last chapter of that fascist book...
RE:RE:I DEEPLY CONDEM THE ACT
by Anti Islamist on Jul 27, 2008 02:41 PM Permalink
can you crosscheck.... ?? till where i know, only one war in entire life of mohamemd was defensive... rest all were offensive... and beside this his treatment to womens, childrens was even worst....
