Krishna told, if war is on you... then fight... but heavy weight in his speech was given to speak against supremacy, as well as krishna haven't told Arjuna to kill random unbelievers... rather the war mahabharta was with in a family, in which krishna told for right purpose even stand against your family clan.
before comparing rama and Mohammed, don't forget that where Mohammed war were aggresive, rama war was defensive... Rama haven't asked his army to take lanka's citizens as slaves, he haven't killed men as young as boys becuz they had pubic hairs... and haven't raped womens on same night, as they butchered their families...
Rama-Ravana war was confined to war ground, and not in killing, enslaving or butchering civilians, but this is not true in case of Mohammed...
anyways... Mosses released israelities from slavery from egypt, rama released peoples from ravana, and krishna also released thousands from slaves not only from that under kansa, but also from jarasangh and many others... Mohammed pushed people into slavery..
Mohammed pushed women at lowest in human categorie worth nothing as sex object... krishna lifted them to equality, even by daring to go against society. the 1000 wifes of krishna were sex slaves released that krishna released from jarasnagh, when society failed to give proper respect to them, krishna provided them the honour to be queen ..
so i think, its only mohammed the false prophet.. that supported slavery and supremacism...
