It was most unfortunate that Congress cancelled land allotment to Shri Amarnath Shrine Board. Agreed it appeased a section of Indian population, but did it not also give space and sanction to seccessionist and fundamentalist forces? These forces assured of a compassionate dealing by the government are targeting Indian people. Even Ghulam Nabi Azad conceded that protest over land transfer to the shrine board were not locally motivated, but had backing from Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. General Sinha also recently revealed that PDP man Mufti Mohammed Saeed was himself part of anti-India forces. Even militants have said that Yaseen Malik and Saeed had staged a kidnap drama of the latter's daughter precisely to set a tone for such attacks. Unfortunately, the Centre has again overlooked such a brutal attack, because they do not want to hurt their appeasement vote bank ahead of the general elections as they are in near disarray and an imminent fall down. If the new government also continues with appeasement, it would be most unfortunate for innocent Indian civilians.
RE:Why appease at the cost of innocent lives?
by younus siddique on Jul 20, 2008 10:22 AM Permalink
in the same way ....riots were not motivated locally ....it were planned and excuted from HINDUS Abroad. the torching for sabarmati express was also not done by any local but were planned by RSS,VHP and BAJRANgdal...will you believe that ....
RE:Why appease at the cost of innocent lives?
by grir reeg on Jul 20, 2008 11:06 AM Permalink
see you are from the same lineage as RSS and Bajrang Dal people. The only difference is your forefathers converted at the point of a sword, while others fought for their identity and chose not to abandon their religion.
RE:Why appease at the cost of innocent lives?
by amitabh badchalan on Jul 20, 2008 10:24 AM Permalink
They had marked the houses of muslims and had reasearched their wealth before the train burning!!!!
THE PHILOSOPHY OF THEIR WAS BUSINESS...LIKE SPENDING 58 RUPPEES TO GET OVER 10000 RUPEES
