The article cleverly misses the other side. By not signing the Deal, what India could achieve? It will not have fuel to the existing Nuclear Pants It can not come out of the present sanctions It can not have the access to the Hitech which is presently denied to it It can not continue its nuclear research being isolated from the Nuclear countries It should always live under threat with Pakisthan on oneside and China on the other Those who donot want to see India as prosperous are against the Deal
RE:Indo Nuclear Deal
by Rakesh Sharma on Jul 18, 2008 02:40 PM Permalink
USA IS PRESSING FOR THIS DEAL BECAUSE IT WANTS TO SELL THIS OLD TECHNOLOGY AND MACHINES TO INDIA. IF YOU LOOK AT THE FUTURE ENERGY PLANNING OF USA, IT IS PLANNING TO INCREASE SOLAR AND WIND ENERGY SO THAT THE ENVIRONMENT BECOMES CLEANS AND THERE IS NO THREAT OF NUCLEAR RADIATION AND CANCER AND THOUSAND OF OTHER DISEASES FOR ITS CITIZENS.
RE:Indo Nuclear Deal
by prabhat mohanty on Jul 18, 2008 04:28 PM Permalink
- Buy new technology and NEW machines from France, Russia and Japan instead of USA.
RE:Indo Nuclear Deal
by amar kumar saraswat on Jul 18, 2008 05:27 PM Permalink
1. If nuclear energy is contributing just 3% of our requirement and just 6% by 2020. It doesn't make much of a difference. What about balance 94%. So, fuel to our existing reactors even if made available doesn't solve energy problems.
2. Whatever sanctions even when removed contribute just 6% of our problems by 2020. What benefit even if they are removed.
3. What hitech when it will be withdrawn when India tests. Its best to develop indigenous tech.
4.Nuclear research anyways they do not wish us to continue as 90% of our reactoors would be under their supervision.
5. It would have live with threat if it doesn't have a nuclear deterrent. That's the Big 5's objective. They want India to remain powerless.
6. India by signing the deal just gets 6% power at 120 bilion dollars and loses independence. Its better to go for coal based , hydroelectric and gas based power.
