Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RE:Indo Nuclear Deal
by amar kumar saraswat on Jul 18, 2008 05:27 PM

1. If nuclear energy is contributing just 3% of our requirement and just 6% by 2020. It doesn't make much of a difference. What about balance 94%. So, fuel to our existing reactors even if made available doesn't solve energy problems.

2. Whatever sanctions even when removed contribute just 6% of our problems by 2020. What benefit even if they are removed.

3. What hitech when it will be withdrawn when India tests. Its best to develop indigenous tech.

4.Nuclear research anyways they do not wish us to continue as 90% of our reactoors would be under their supervision.

5. It would have live with threat if it doesn't have a nuclear deterrent. That's the Big 5's objective. They want India to remain powerless.

6. India by signing the deal just gets 6% power at 120 bilion dollars and loses independence. Its better to go for coal based , hydroelectric and gas based power.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Uncovering the Indo-US nuclear deal