WRONG! This deal could have been much better than this one. Manmohan failed to bargain properly. The deal is titled towards USA, and we are nothing more an appendage. And also, there appears no real need to go for the deal with such a haste. Why did Manmohan shy away from debate ? Why are scientists against deal ?(Most retired scientists are against it . manmohan said Bush is the most pro- India president
RE:Article is WRONG
by Anubhav Lal on Jul 14, 2008 10:13 PM Permalink
But Manmohan Singh was busy bargaining support of CPI. How can he bargain his best when his supporters were betraying him
RE:Article is WRONG
by Shesh Lak on Jul 14, 2008 08:11 PM Permalink
Beggers are not choosers.. So first better understand where are you coming from. We can't dictate terms to Pak and B'Desh and you are dreaming about dicating terms to US.. CHADAR JITNI BADI HOTI HAI PAIR UTNA HI FAILANA CHAHIYE.
RE:Article is WRONG
by Falcon on Jul 14, 2008 08:19 PM Permalink
I think on issues like the nuclear deal we should have a national consensus. If a large section is opposing the deal there must be something which needs a think over. All american parties seem to be in favor of the deal so it must be more beneficial to them than us.
RE:Article is WRONG
by Nimesh Dikshit on Jul 14, 2008 11:15 PM Permalink
You said it right, Beggers can not be choosers. Last time i visited india - i gave 1 rupee change to a begger - while boarding a rikshaw. He promptly gave it back to me saying, "sir please buy something for your kids with this." While your statement is true in general, its not true for Indian beggers! And nation is build of the people. If India is a begger then its made of beggers - and spirit has to maintained. 'nuph said!
RE:Article is WRONG
by roy philip on Jul 14, 2008 08:17 PM Permalink
No one has to dectate anything,People who are sofond of US you can very well live there. We Indians just wan't to live with dignity and prode not US servents.
RE:Article is WRONG
by Shesh Lak on Jul 14, 2008 08:31 PM Permalink
ROY.. looser don't make history it's only the winner whose name is engraved into the wall. Ask your self how much dignified you are. It easy to make hue and cry about anything but it needs guts to face the reality. You must be living in a city but have you ever been to a village and saw the living condition of poor countrymen?NO, you know why ppl like you can just enjoy beating around the bush and nothing else. We need what we need and to get that you we have to take some bold steps. More the risk, more the benefit. Other wise live like a dog by depending on others for every pie.
RE:Article is WRONG
by desikan r on Jul 14, 2008 09:33 PM Permalink
Arent you being ridiculous? Do you think that remote villages shall be supplied with electricity from nuclear energy as soon as the deal is done? All statistics on costing and infrastructure required state that the nuclear energy would be able to solve our requirement by about 6-8% by the end of the century. Would this 6-8% be for the remote rural India or for the ever-hungry ever-expanding urban India? Get your priorities right. The deal isnt going to solve any of the problems that U may have in mind. No poor countrymen that U speak of in rural areas are going to benefit very soon. So instead of rushing for whatever li'l piece of bone is thrown at U by the US and the West, try to assert your will and wish. It may not give you anything, but remember .... neither does deal........ esp for the reasons that u r supporting it for.
RE:Article is WRONG
by Bonaventure on Jul 14, 2008 08:19 PM Permalink
Manoo .. U r suffering from dyslexic amnesia... deal or no-deal you too should consider early retirement.. although U are very good with words.. I must say
RE:Article is WRONG
by west on Jul 14, 2008 08:32 PM Permalink
you can only dream that the deal can be much better than this. in reality this is the best deal india could have got. don't get carried away by the dirty politics
mms said he'll have debate once the agreement gets finalised
retired scientists are like widows ... i give more importance to scientists who are still in service than to that of the retired ones.
RE:RE:Article is WRONG
by west on Jul 14, 2008 08:33 PM Permalink
you can only dream that the deal can be much better than this. in reality this is the best deal india could have got. don't get carried away by the dirty politics
mms said he'll have debate once the agreement gets finalised
retired scientists are like widows ... i give more importance to scientists who are still in service than to that of the retired ones.
RE:RE:RE:Article is WRONG
by west on Jul 14, 2008 08:38 PM Permalink
you can only dream that the deal can be much better than this. in reality this is the best deal india could have got. don\'t get carried away by the dirty politics
mms said he\'ll have debate once the agreement gets finalised
retired scientists are like widows ... i give more importance to scientists who are still in service than to that of the retired ones.
