Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Message deleted by moderator.    Hide replies
  RE:Angels
by Asheesh Sinha on Feb 28, 2008 02:03 PM   Permalink
Thats the difference. No cool dude told "tomorrow" that Ram setu was built by Lord Ram, but it was scripted long before your forefather's birth

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Angels
by Rajeev on Feb 28, 2008 02:10 PM   Permalink
May be your grand grand son will write the same thing when somebody question's harry potter's existence .,. its as simple as that

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Angels
by Karthic GK on Feb 28, 2008 02:23 PM   Permalink
Well well well...Rajeev, probably not a great idea to compare Hanuman and Harry Potter...Asheesh, not a great idea to refer to anyone's fore fathers...or question someone's intellect on a matter of opinion...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Angels
by Rajeev on Feb 28, 2008 02:47 PM   Permalink
500 BC to 1000 BC and the bridge is there for 1.73 million years ... Valmiki should be a time machine to see things 1.73 million years back .. and by the way iam not advocating for destroying the natural bridge for some cheap political mileage . My concern is only this.. The government should not stoop to somebody's claim of Ram-ravan mythology and stop the developmental activity if its economical and geologically safe ....

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Angels
by Asheesh Sinha on Feb 28, 2008 02:43 PM   Permalink
Ok, somehow I cant reply to you. Did you read my message that I am an aethist. More than Gods, I believe in faith that people have in those gods. this faith is what makes us different from animals.

I am not keeping any limits on you. People like you come around everyday, acting all pessimistic..

I dont care. People like you talk temples , mosques etc are root of all "Evil" (Riots), but do not realize it is ppl like you who make them issues by such cheap stunts (like idea of demolishing Ram Setus). If now its temple, tomorrow it will be a play ground, another day its going to be aur you breathe. Ppl dont need a cause for violence, they just find some. But having these wonderful ideas like demolishing Ram Sethu will raise the water too high, but i guess you dont care..

Anyway, Rama was first mentioned in Vedas, then in Valmiki's Ramayan, Vishnu Puran, Vaayu Puran. Valmiki Ramayana is dated variously from 500 BC to 100 BC

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Angels
by Rajeev on Feb 28, 2008 02:32 PM   Permalink
Oh really .. u will keep limits 4 me .... And as per you Rama lived in which century .. lets play some intelligent game here

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Angels
by Rajeev on Feb 28, 2008 03:06 PM   Permalink
Also i dont think you are an absolute atheist , i will place you as a pragmatist ..

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Angels
by Asheesh Sinha on Feb 28, 2008 02:55 PM   Permalink
Though Navy has said its not safe, thats not the main issue..

Auranzeb destroyed multiple Indian temples, and he will be always known in history as an autocrat and tyrant for that, do you want the same tyrnany to be back?

anyway, religion is way above than urs or mine understanding. And just remember this fact, in this world if you claim to know 1000 things there are hundreds of millions of things you dont have the slightest idea about

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Angels
by Rajeev on Feb 28, 2008 03:04 PM   Permalink
I think i have to agree with your last sentence. And will disagree with the one bfore that ... I dont want to think that Religion is above yours or my undertsanding...Thats the main reason people have given such big importance to religions and forgets everything else... Anyway , nice talking to you Mr Sinha .. cheers

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:RE:Angels
by Asheesh Sinha on Feb 28, 2008 03:29 PM   Permalink
You dont know the extent of my aethism. But still it is more of the sentiments of others i care about. And faith is absolutely connected to sentiments. So just because you or I dont believe in something, doesnt give us a right to play with faith of millions. If you dont believe , just keep your distance (like I do), there's no reason to harass them mentally (and i am not talking abt faiths of just Hindus, that includes muslims, christians, sikhs everyone)

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Angels
by Krishna V on Feb 28, 2008 02:31 PM   Permalink
Despite bible being younger, you people are still debating Jesus' marital status, there is no account of 17 years of Jesus's young age.
Bible is the most controvertial book on this earth with church mafia being at the forefront of messing it. This aspect also highlights the narrow mindedness, disorientation and vulnerability of your community that a single book has run into umpteen controversies.
Even cheap erotic and mystery books are more authentic than your book.

So just take your missionary agenda and put it in your excretory opening. Got me you son of the one who does not have a male or female organ? Now don't apply logic, this kind of miracle is in line with ones considered miracles by christians.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Angels
by jay on Feb 28, 2008 02:42 PM   Permalink
in whole world, howmany peoples know about ur ram and hanuman?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Angels
by Rajeev on Feb 28, 2008 02:44 PM   Permalink
Nice one, Krishna ... i liked it ... But along with that book, Quran and Gita also should go along ...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:Angels
by balaji dev on Feb 28, 2008 06:06 PM   Permalink
Rajeev,

Dont be fooling around or just send something for just you have to. Think of what he is saying and what you have stated. Rather than focusing on this topic you better concentrate on what is told on above you mentioned books.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Cabinet panel approves Sethu affidavit