Why can't any non-Kashmiri or non-Himachali settle down and by property in J&K and Himachal Pradesh? Why do other Indian citizens need a permit even to enter north-east states for tourism?
If Jammu and Kashmir is for only Kashmiris, if Himachal Pradesh is only for original Himachalis, if North-Eastern states are only for local residents, why can't Maharashtra be only for Marathis?
RE:Raj Thacheray is right!
by Pravin on Feb 22, 2008 03:03 PM Permalink
Sure it can be but for that people have to become terrorist and start demanding a seperate state and the army should be called in. All the hindus should be either massacred or killed. Army should be called in and should patrol it day and night. All the industries would leave without any jobs left and many more.
RE:Raj Thacheray is right!
by s m on Feb 22, 2008 03:56 PM Permalink
HP and NE states got special status without any terrorists activities ! ! ! Same status has been rewarded to Andaman, Nicobar and Lakshadweep without any such activities !!!
RE:RE:Raj Thacheray is right!
by on Feb 22, 2008 09:57 PM Permalink
Who says NE got special status without any terrorist activities??? More innocent people have died in NE then in J&K till date.
RE:Raj Thacheray is right!
by Vaibhav Pradhan on Feb 22, 2008 07:13 PM Permalink
Pravin Bhaiyya, you areputting cart before the bulls. Special status to JK was given when there was no terrorism whatsoever. But yes, you can argue that giving special status ultimately brought terrorism in that state. But your point is well taken.
Anyways, whatever they say, son of soil may not be constitutional but CONSTITUTION is for the people and people are NOT for the constitution. Constitution can be (and has been) changed to suit the changing circumstances. Why not change in this instance?
RE:RE:Raj Thacheray is right!
by s m on Feb 22, 2008 03:58 PM Permalink
Either make all states like J&K or make J&K like all other states. But do not continue special status for J&K without giving similar status to other states!!!
RE:Raj Thacheray is right!
by on Feb 23, 2008 03:57 AM Permalink
153-A. PROMOTING ENMITY BETWEEN DIFFERENT GROUPS ON GROUNDS OF RELIGION, RACE, PLACE OF BIRTH, RESIDENCE, LANGUAGE, ETC., AND DOING ACTS PREJUDICIAL TO MAINTENANCE OF HARMONY. (1) Whoever -(a) by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or(b) commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely to disturb the public tranquillity ........ shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine.
