Pravin Bhaiyya, you areputting cart before the bulls. Special status to JK was given when there was no terrorism whatsoever. But yes, you can argue that giving special status ultimately brought terrorism in that state. But your point is well taken.
Anyways, whatever they say, son of soil may not be constitutional but CONSTITUTION is for the people and people are NOT for the constitution. Constitution can be (and has been) changed to suit the changing circumstances. Why not change in this instance?
