In a nutsehll: it is sad that in spite of having Pakistan, an unstable terrorist state as its neighbor, India, instead of creating freidnship with it Muslim population and Bangladesh (both of whom do not like Pakistan)has opted to paint them as it enemies too. Even a 6 year old knows that a the enemy of my enemy is my friend. But then Indian leaders these days lack neurons. And then you have ignorant militant Hindus who love to lump Indian Muslims with paskitan. What an intelligent and diplomatic move and thought process might I add!
RE:What is your IQ?
by p on Aug 03, 2008 08:51 AM Permalink
You seem to be a moron. DO you remember those bangladeshis planting bombs!!! Do you remember SIMI people. muslim brotherhood is stronger than national sentiments. In islam mullahs rule with an iron hand, and, that is what is required. jews,christians and muslims came from the same land and share many similar values, know each other better. Learn from america, how to tackle terrorism!
RE:What is your IQ?
by Mahavir on Aug 03, 2008 08:36 AM Permalink
Dear Ahmad Navaz - Why blame Hindus ? What do you mean by friendhsip with muslim population ? They get same benefits as any regular Indian and on top of it HAJ subsidy from Hindu tax payers money. What more you want ? Do you think Bangaldesh is a friendly nation ? Ofcourse not, because India is Hindu - a non muslim state. Not that muslims countries are frinedly among themselves. In a nut shell Islam cannot coexist with non muslims. Don't you see what India got in 1947 - a partition based on relegion. And current happening you can see in Europe/USA ( Denmark, Netherlands, UK etc)and other non muslims countries.
RE:What is your IQ?
by a m on Aug 03, 2008 05:34 PM Permalink
We should not assume without proof (which does not exist) that Pakistan was the creation of Muslims.
Logically the Upper Hindus too might have done it as an act of "Good Riddance", and merely sold the idea to Mr. Jinnah, et al.
Communal separation, a kind of Apartheid, was not a sound idea. All the trouble is because neither the Pakistanis could remove "Hindu" India from their minds nor we Indians could remove them from ours.
So apparently well meaning Communal Separation never really took off. The situation has two possible outcomes: (a) Carry the fight beyond the point of return, which in today's terms means fight with full use of Nuclear Weapons. (b) Merge the two countries back into one entity to psychologically erase They versus We from all minds.
It is any body's guess which one will actually materialize, but I feel the probability of (b) is far less than of (a).
Therefore I believe that if nuclear war is inevitable, let it happen in our time rather than our Children's, and let it be We who start it rather than be surprised by others. No use delaying the inevitable.
Not many would support the conclusions (mainly because it sounds so harsh), but let some one come out with better reasoning.
