Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Indo nepal treaty
by Ram swamy on Apr 24, 2008 07:18 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

If at all the new Maoist Government think that a new treaty is to be drafted or to be amended in the exhisting Treaty then India should be cautious and alert and not bow down to any of the demands which are arbitrary and lead to chaos in both countries. Simultaneously India should not be flexible. The poor economic growth and unemployment were created by the Maoist themselves during their a decade long insurgency. It is also advisable that India restricts its assistance to Nepal in the course of time as I have been residing in Nepal since more then 7 years the attitude of Nepalese towards India and Indians has always remained sour. Due to the Maoists trade union policy many of the Indian industries are on the verge of closure. Although the exhisting nepal india treaty clearly states that both country's people can work in either countries but the Maoists have threatened many of the indian industries to remove the Indian workmen and as a result some of the companies are still facing problems. If this attitude of Maoist continue after heading the Govt. then there is no doubt Raj Thackrey leader of Maharashtra Nav Nirman sena will drive away the nepalese working in Maharashtra just as the shiv sena did to Bangladeshis. Trade policy border issues have to be viewed seriously so that the new treaty will require no fresh amendments every now and then to suit the Nepal. indian industries also has to flourish and therefore, the Ministry of Commerce and Industries should take a positiv

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Indo nepal treaty
by Ankur on Apr 24, 2008 07:54 PM   Permalink
I totally agree with you Ram swamy

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  Re: Indo nepal treaty
by David on Mar 21, 2009 04:00 PM   Permalink
hey ram swamy think twice as to what you say. ..... Nepalese are treated no better in India. i'm neither a Indian nor a nepali. PPL have sour feelings for each other in both the countries and it is because of ppl lie Ankur, ram, namraj and all those racist here on this blog who have added fuel to this hate thing between indians and Nepalis, let me tell you "racist" ppl from both side are doing lowly jobs in each other country. so remove the perception that you are superior than the other. As humans we are all equal. Racists have no place in both Nepal and India.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Indo nepal treaty
by Namraj Joshi on Apr 24, 2008 07:31 PM   Permalink
I think Indians have flourished enough in Nepal. Now it is high time Nepal shrugs off the fake concern shown by India and Indians towards Nepal and build the nation from scratch. For yor information the feeling of animosity is mutual on both the sides and maybe this has something to do with the wrong attitude of india towards its neighbours. India did no favor to Bangladesh. It was only to bleed Pakistan that India helped theBangladeshis.
Bangladeshis are still there and so will Nepalese remain here. The Thackerays are seasoned politicians and they shout at times when their chips are low .I think we need to be practical and not biased.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Indo nepal treaty
by indresh uniyal on Apr 24, 2008 08:30 PM   Permalink
indo - Nepal treaty should be renewed as it was too old and things changed with the time.
What r u saying Indians flourished enough in Nepal? what a joke. Nepalees are here to earn their bread butter. Nepaless here I talked with them they are also against the new Govt of Nepal. They are happy here, getting good education, jobs and earning handsome money. A generation worked hard and nest generation came at par with Indians.
Why r u worried about Bangladesh?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
http://www.rediff.com/news/2008/apr/24nepal.htm