If we ask for clemency for Sarabjit Singh, what guarantee that PAK will not similar exchange from India. India is having hardcore pakistanis in our prison ready to be hanged, but it is still hanging. (if it amounts to exchange it would become costly to India). Is it justified to intervene in the affairs of other country. If a person is proved guilty he/she should be punished.
RE:Sarabjit's case
by Jayatheerthan K on Apr 18, 2008 05:12 PM Permalink
I agree with you 100 % that ANY criminal, irrespective of his religion, nationalism or cast, should be punished as per the applicable laws WITHOUT any mercy!
I feel that India should intervene in Sarabjit's case ONLY if India believes that he was not behind the 1990 Lahore bomb blasts.. Otherwise it is shame on India's part to intervene in the affairs of another country.
RE:Sarabjit's case
by MNS on Apr 18, 2008 05:02 PM Permalink
No exchange...whatsoevr they do with indian spy...but not a single paki shuld leave india alive..
RE:Sarabjit's case
by bala sreenivasan on Apr 18, 2008 05:26 PM Permalink
While espionage is an accepted aspect of International politics, terrorism is not! the dividing line between them may seem slim, but it definitely exists! In a quid pro quo gesture, if a Paki spy is released, it is fine, but not a terrorist.
RE:Sarabjit's case
by thomas on Apr 18, 2008 05:00 PM Permalink
In India Terrorists like u are given food and looked after.So any Pak terrorist is happy in India.
RE:Sarabjit's case
by Yaqoot Mir on Apr 18, 2008 11:55 PM Permalink
Please India has barely enough food to feed its hungry masses, dont tell me about feeding pakistanis. LOL