Max Muller:(1823-1900) Its know that he lived in poverty until he was employed by the British and greatly praised by his superiors for his duplicity in translation .Muller was paid 4 pounds in the 18th century for every page he wrote. Never visited India once...wrote..The Vedas are like the twaddles of idiots and ravings of mad men. Sanskrit and English are the varieties of one and the same language. Some of his Sanskrit translation is this way...
GarbaGarh in affect means inner chamber of the temple..Muller's translation is "WOMB HOUSE"
Hiranyagarbh in affect means state of manifested form of Maya that holds and contains all the worlds with in....Muller translated this as the "GOLDEN GERM".
Ex certs from some of his own letters:
To Chevalier Bunsen:
"India is much riper for chirstainity that ROME OR GREECE were at the time of St Paul..For the good of this struggle I shall lay down my life or at least lend my hand to bring about this struggle. I shall learn the language , make friends by means of which the old Indian mischief of priestcraft could be overthrown and way opened for entrance of simple Christan teachings. What ever finds roots in India will over shadow the whole of Asia"
To Duke of Argyll:
The missionaries have done far more that they themselves are aware of .The ancient religion of india is doomed and if chirstianity does not step in who's fault will it be?. It would be simply dishonest on my part were to hide my convictions that the rel
RE:Know you Max Muller
by srini srini on Apr 15, 2008 07:57 AM Permalink
Prof Taranath was paid Rs 10,000 in 1866..to write a Sanskrit dictionary with derogatory meanings of common words like Ashwameda yaga was interpreted as killing of the horse..he worte his dictionary to fit in Maxmuller translation of the Vedas. There was no necessity to write this as there already Sage Panini's Grammer and dictionary.
Sage Panini wrote in his grammar that the word Goghn should be interpreted as "One who recieves the Cow"..however Prof Taranath to Fit Mullers Schema of things deliberately interprets this as "Killer of the Cow" in strict violation if Sage Panini's words.
RE:RE:Know you Max Muller
by srini srini on Apr 15, 2008 07:58 AM Permalink
Sir Willaim Jones 1784(Resigned from Chief Justice of India and Joined Asiatic Society of Bangal to write derogatory statement about Hinduism)..Wrote...
"As to the general extension of our pure faith in Hindustan there are at present many sad obstacles..we may assure ourselves that Hindus will never be converted by any mission from the Chruch of Rome, or any other Chruch the only human mode perhaps of causing so great a revolution will be to translate in to Sanscrit such chapters as ISAIAH together with one of the Gospels with a plain prefactory discourse containing full evidence of very distant ages in which prediction themselves and the history of the divine person Jesus predicted were severally made public and then Quietly disperse the work among the well educated natives"
He also wrote"RAMA and CRISHNA" must have been introduced and their several attributed explained the first of them I believe was the DIONSYS(God of wine and worldly enjoyements) of the Greeks The first poet of the hindus Valmic and his Ramayan is an Epik poem comparision of the 2 poems
DIONYSUS and the Ramayan would prove that DIONYSYS and RAMA would have been the same person.I incline to think that RAMA son of CUSH..." --From True history and Relegion of India Pg247
RE:Know you Max Muller
by srini srini on Apr 15, 2008 08:05 AM Permalink
These are the words of Chief Justice of India...can you imagine this rogues statement...also look at what he is saying that RAMA is Son of CUSH...CUSH is supposed to SON of RAMA
Extracts From the "True History and Relegion of India"
RE:Know you Max Muller
by Kris iyer on Apr 15, 2008 06:25 PM Permalink
Srini, These schemes and attacks on Hindu civilisation had been going on since the 12th century, [ Read V.S. Naipaul's "INDIA:The Wounded Civilisation" ]. Unfortunately, it continues in places like TamilNadu, even today, in the hands of the present ruling party, DMK and its leaders. They contribute very little to any form of civilisation, but are vociferous about destroying Hindu faith. It is not surprising that some of the contributors to these columns do not know where they belong. Mere disrupters who have nothing much to offer India. Shd they convert to Islam, you bet they would keep their mouths firmly shut - cowards, I suppose.
