If someone found an extran planet in the universe he has to prove. if he said he has not found anything, whether he has to prove that what he has not found? if rama built bridge then why rama has not built any siva temple since he worshiped siva in the ramaeshwaram beach as per ramayana. though ramayanam is a famaous ithikasa there is no signifigant number of ramar temple in our country why? but most vaishnava temple has vishnu or tirupati which is very famous and also balaji was minor incarnation of vishnu as per story. balaji did not tell any upathesa to people but he got so much reputation among people by crowd pulling. why not rama or krishna whose were two fabulous ethics heroes?
RE:about existence
by Manickam on Sep 26, 2007 10:27 AM Permalink
In rameshwaram temple the main god is siva you know my friend parekh? it was storyed that rama came here and worshipped hero(Lord) siva. that is why rama idols are seen there but it is not a ramar temple.
RE:about existence
by Action Plan on Sep 26, 2007 10:43 AM Permalink
Manickam..Can you prove that in TretaYug who are all the kings ruled at that time.You can not do that because man is in capable.So you say that in Trtayug or that contemporay people Humankind did not exists.
Proving a new thing which he claimed found was different and Proving the History is different..First know the difference between them after that barkk..Just do not show your ignorance.
RE:about existence
by Manickam on Sep 26, 2007 11:15 AM Permalink
i mean, found is discovered which unearth the things are already exists. for example most of planet are existing which are not seen by us but when science(scopes) improves then discover also improves. in science there is no treta yuga according to science stone,bronze... ages only. no hindu yugas were proved as per science. recently united nation saba announced that oct.2nd is going to be taken as a world importantday for something(forgive me mahatma since i am not able to tell the correct thing). gandhi is a true and history and proven. if rama is true then why not his one of his best character cannot be taken for follwers to observe as importantday in the world, not only by hindus but for all communities,(particularly by united nation saba). if you say mahatma is rama follower i cannot say anything.
