Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
about existence
by Manickam on Sep 26, 2007 10:01 AM

If someone found an extran planet in the universe he has to prove. if he said he has not found anything, whether he has to prove that what he has not found? if rama built bridge then why rama has not built any siva temple since he worshiped siva in the ramaeshwaram beach as per ramayana. though ramayanam is a famaous ithikasa there is no signifigant number of ramar temple in our country why? but most vaishnava temple has vishnu or tirupati which is very famous and also balaji was minor incarnation of vishnu as per story. balaji did not tell any upathesa to people but he got so much reputation among people by crowd pulling. why not rama or krishna whose were two fabulous ethics heroes?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Nobody has proved Ram didn't exist'