In 1972, Karunanidhi said, Ramsethu is symbol of India's cultural Heritage. Couple of year ago, referring to abduction by Veerappan, he consoled Dr. Rajkumar saying you went on Vanavas like Rama. He along with his wife fell on the feet of Satya Saibaba to seek his blessings.
Two days ago he said, Rama never existed! Today he disputed himself by saying Rama was a drunkard!
His statement have no coherence because, he gets the script form VATICAN! Whatever he saying today is the voice of VATICAN. The real purpose is to turnt he heat from Sonia and prevent a possible national upraise and turn this in to an Arya-Dravida conflict.
When our beloved leader Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated, Congree pointed fingers at DMK saying it colluded with LTTE. Today Congress shares power with DMK because it didn%u2019t matter to Sonia that DMAK was a conspirator in the killing of her husband Rajiv Gandhi. She is not interested in Rajivgandhi. She stepped in to Rajiv;s life and in to India to pursue the agenda of VATICAN PARIVAR.
Therefore, Please don't get carried away with Karunanidhi%u2019s utterances, keep your attacks focused on VATICAN PARIVAR & Its agent in 10 Jan path
RE:Ignore Karunanidhi
by Alexander on Sep 25, 2007 09:13 PM Permalink
I wish people would learn to understand english before replying to topics...
There are a number of, not to put too fine a point on it, lunatic assumptions you have made. If you were a village idiot or a circus clown, perhaps they would be valid, but in a forum of important issues, its quite unforgivable.
Firstly. You said:
"Couple of year ago, referring to abduction by Veerappan, he consoled Dr. Rajkumar saying you went on Vanavas like Rama."
So what? Just because he compared something to someone does not mean he believes it exists. If I say that that picture looks like a unicorn, does it mean i believe unicorns exist? This is quite a basic statement.. You needn't be particularly literate to understand, you know...
The second issue is your statement that the Vatican is involved... Lol.. You're either suffering from some severe case of abnormal psychological malfunction or you're a blithering idiot.
Ambika Soni was the minister in charge for the release and from the last I know, she isn't involved with the Vatican in any shape or form...
The Vatican has enough trouble as it is with their gay priests in America and the problems in Europe to care two hoots about what happens in India.
Finally, the affidavit only said that there is no historical evidence to PROVE that ram existed, NOT that ram DID NOT EXIST.
Both are seperate issues and different statements. How can you be ignorant enough to believe the former and the latter are one and the same?
RE:Ignore Karunanidhi
by pptc@cox.net on Sep 26, 2007 03:32 AM Permalink
vatican is intensely interested in india. the previous pope, after being welcomed by the hindu govt of india, was ecstatic at the "huge harvest of souls in india". and it is not a coincidence that suddenly htere are disproportionate number of xtian ministers at the center.
