I wish people would learn to understand english before replying to topics...
There are a number of, not to put too fine a point on it, lunatic assumptions you have made. If you were a village idiot or a circus clown, perhaps they would be valid, but in a forum of important issues, its quite unforgivable.
Firstly. You said:
"Couple of year ago, referring to abduction by Veerappan, he consoled Dr. Rajkumar saying you went on Vanavas like Rama."
So what? Just because he compared something to someone does not mean he believes it exists. If I say that that picture looks like a unicorn, does it mean i believe unicorns exist? This is quite a basic statement.. You needn't be particularly literate to understand, you know...
The second issue is your statement that the Vatican is involved... Lol.. You're either suffering from some severe case of abnormal psychological malfunction or you're a blithering idiot.
Ambika Soni was the minister in charge for the release and from the last I know, she isn't involved with the Vatican in any shape or form...
The Vatican has enough trouble as it is with their gay priests in America and the problems in Europe to care two hoots about what happens in India.
Finally, the affidavit only said that there is no historical evidence to PROVE that ram existed, NOT that ram DID NOT EXIST.
Both are seperate issues and different statements. How can you be ignorant enough to believe the former and the latter are one and the same?
