RE:Ram was just imaginary character by on Sep 21, 2007 10:28 PM   Permalink PAKISTAN WILL GIVE MONEY AND WEAPONS TO TAMILS TO FIGHT INDIA AND WILL GIVE THEM SHELTER IN ISLAM WILL ACCEPT ALL TO BECOME MUSLIMS. ---Rehman.    Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram was just imaginary character by Pandu Havaldar 61-62 on Sep 21, 2007 10:29 PM   Permalink We are already friends with Baloch, Afgani, Niazi, Sindi in Sindh and Mohajir's. Insha Allah we will break pakistan in tiny part. Murgistan ke Rahmani Kide    Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram was just imaginary character by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 21, 2007 10:31 PM   Permalink Welcome ... another Idiot who failed in 3rd std under old British syllabus!    Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram was just imaginary character by Jagannathan on Sep 21, 2007 10:33 PM   Permalink @pritish nagaraj-----Hence says some original thinker brainwashed by advaniji and other brahminjis. Get a life, boy.    Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram was just imaginary character by vicky on Sep 21, 2007 10:39 PM   Permalink that is the reality of Anti Ram people. They believe that Ravan was there. They beleive that Vibhishan was there. They even believe that Sita was there. They also believe that a war was ensued with Ravan, in which his brother Vibhishan also took part. They would also believe that Hanuman was there. they would also also believe that nal and niel were there. But just to make fool of their own people, they will make stories that Lord Ram did never exist. Taht the Sethu, which is still there, was not made by Ram. It is not a issue for intelligent people. But what would a sensible child call this?    Forward   |   Report abuse