RE:Ram was just imaginary character
by vicky on Sep 21, 2007 10:39 PM

that is the reality of Anti Ram people.

They believe that Ravan was there.

They beleive that Vibhishan was there.

They even believe that Sita was there.

They also believe that a war was ensued with Ravan, in which his brother Vibhishan also took part.

They would also believe that Hanuman was there.

they would also also believe that nal and niel were there.

But just to make fool of their own people, they will make stories that Lord Ram did never exist.

Taht the Sethu, which is still there, was not made by Ram. It is not a issue for intelligent people.

But what would a sensible child call this?

Forward | Report abuse