ASI had hurriedly acted as Govt.'s chamcha. The Director Monuments must have thought that by this action of his perhaps he can grab the DG ASI's post which has been advertised. Actuslly for the past over a decade IAS officers are holding the post of DG ASI. These people are hardly aquainted with archaeology of history. They are just sycophants of the Govt. How can they be expected to justify their posts?
No body bothered to verify from Mr. K.M. Srivastava, former Director (Expeditions Abroad) ASI or Mr. SP Gupta, Secretary Indian Archaeological Society (both of whom are residing in Delhi itself) about their findings in Ayodhya in 1994 which could never be taken forward because of political reasons.
The Director (Monuments) at least is a product of the Indian Institute of Archaeology but he has also forgotten his training and is singing the tune of IAS and the Govt.
RE:ASI Needs to verify facts first
by faizan alikhan on Sep 15, 2007 01:35 PM Permalink
Read VEEDAS and u may know that lord rama was there or not but I like to tell u in the light of VEEDAS only that existance of Prophet mohammad is there or not . This is all not to insult to any community. Plz its my request to my non muslim friends plz read VEEDAS before u comment any thing plz read that ur doubts will get clear. Shri Shri Ravi Shankar has admitted that prophet mohammed is mentioned in VEEDS and Ram is not mentioned .
