Again about this anti-Brahmanical rants that I see.
Which Varna did Lord Rama belong to?
Which was Lord Krishna's Varna?
If the Lord himself was not depicted as a "Brahmin" in the scriptures, why did the Brahmins not do that?
Do you know what Ravana's Varna (Caste as the British labeled it) was? For those who do not know Ravana was a Brahmin.
So after reading these hate filled posts, you wonder why luxury enjoying, Hinduism creating Brahmins did not make all the heroes Brahmins and the Asuras all non-Brahmins.
Readers understand the disinformation propogated by these and I have no doubt that they will try to supress this and ask questions about Krishna' feats. (Don't worry there are clear answers for these, which the haters don't want you to hear)
This ploy only works when abetted by a conniving insider hwo helps "delete" the rational argumens and keeps the illogical hateful info on the board.
RE:debunking r subbu & thamilanbahn
by Jeffrey Sharma on Oct 23, 2007 09:42 AM Permalink
Whole world will be hindu by 2050 A.D. Ram and Sita will be everywhere. Ram is only truth and Ram is only real god. Ram can walk on fire Ram can make big sethus. Only Ram can save this country. Chant Ram Chant Sita, if you want to survive, if you want mukti.
