Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
debunking r subbu & thamilanbahn
by Jeffrey Mittal on Oct 20, 2007 10:44 AM

cont'd

Again about this anti-Brahmanical rants that I see.

Which Varna did Lord Rama belong to?

Which was Lord Krishna's Varna?

If the Lord himself was not depicted as a "Brahmin" in the scriptures, why did the Brahmins not do that?

Do you know what Ravana's Varna (Caste
as the British labeled it) was?
For those who do not know Ravana was a Brahmin.

So after reading these hate filled posts, you wonder why luxury enjoying, Hinduism creating Brahmins did not make all the heroes Brahmins and the Asuras all non-Brahmins.

Readers understand the disinformation propogated by these and I have no doubt that they will try to supress this and ask questions about Krishna' feats. (Don't worry there are clear answers for these, which the haters don't want you to hear)

This ploy only works when abetted by a conniving insider hwo helps "delete" the rational argumens and keeps the illogical hateful info on the board.

I wonder who that may be?


    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Denying Ram is denying India