If Center has guts, they should declare Mahammed or Jesus did not exist ? They cann't do that even though there is no archiological evidence of Jesus or Mahammed.
Rama or Ramayana is several thousands old history. Did Govt (Center) had all the record of India's all old history ? Its shame to all congressies who still support Center for their above anti-Hindu Nature.
Mahatma Gandhi used to read and explain GITA to others.
Few months before when Pranab Mukherjee had an accident and seriously injured, all those days in the bed he read GITA few times. WHY did he ?
Its shame we (Indians) still supprting congress Govt at the center, particularly Sonia Maino...
Another thing is Rama and Ramayana's ASI fact is Communists manifesto too. It is communists manifesto Center is trying to pose and establish.
RE:Does Center has guts to declare there was no evidence of Mahammed or Jesus ?
by Truth Teller on Sep 13, 2007 10:03 AM Permalink
It is ASI's finding, not Government politicians, now any one can disprove because it is
infront of court who ultimately decides which is just as per law. Sometimes it is very
very difficult to digest these kind of news(facts as per ASI), especially when you and
all your household beleive from birth. I recommend whoever has the proof should present
infront of the court instead of these discussions in media. Can't in India anyone who
can keep a lawyer who can defend or prove against ASI?
But remember just because we beleived, truth will not become false or false become
truth. E.g., many centuries people beleieved earth is flat, or sun going around earth...
did they change just because we believed. When the proof came beleiefs have to change
accordingly otherwise we making ourselves liars and our children followers of the lie.
Your belief determinse your destiny
Sometime back I read in Competetive Success(I ma sure you can refer to may other
hostorical books), a magazine that many Group 1 exam takers prepare had secion on
persons Past, mentioned Jesus 4B.C Budha ~500BC Mohemmed ~500AD there they showed
Valmiki ~800BC and Vedavyas ~800BC as Sanskrit poets, who wrote stories, why didn;t this
agitation takes place then? You know more thing Valmiki is contemperor of Ram as per
Ramayana... i.e Valmiki wrote part of Ramayana as they lived in same age. how is it
possible one who lived 170000years back and one who lived
RE:Does Center has guts to declare there was no evidence of Mahammed or Jesus ?
by Ramanath Babu on Sep 13, 2007 10:19 AM Permalink
In coming months, when Dushra and Deepali are clebrated, no congressman should be allowed to visit any temple, or participate in any function organized in your locality. These people should be socially outsted. This is how Hindus should react to UPA members.
