Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RE:Does Center has guts to declare there was no evidence of Mahammed or Jesus ?
by Truth Teller on Sep 13, 2007 10:03 AM

It is ASI's finding, not Government politicians, now any one can disprove because it is

infront of court who ultimately decides which is just as per law. Sometimes it is very

very difficult to digest these kind of news(facts as per ASI), especially when you and

all your household beleive from birth. I recommend whoever has the proof should present

infront of the court instead of these discussions in media. Can't in India anyone who

can keep a lawyer who can defend or prove against ASI?

But remember just because we beleived, truth will not become false or false become

truth. E.g., many centuries people beleieved earth is flat, or sun going around earth...

did they change just because we believed. When the proof came beleiefs have to change

accordingly otherwise we making ourselves liars and our children followers of the lie.

Your belief determinse your destiny

Sometime back I read in Competetive Success(I ma sure you can refer to may other

hostorical books), a magazine that many Group 1 exam takers prepare had secion on

persons Past, mentioned Jesus 4B.C Budha ~500BC Mohemmed ~500AD there they showed

Valmiki ~800BC and Vedavyas ~800BC as Sanskrit poets, who wrote stories, why didn;t this

agitation takes place then? You know more thing Valmiki is contemperor of Ram as per

Ramayana... i.e Valmiki wrote part of Ramayana as they lived in same age. how is it

possible one who lived 170000years back and one who lived

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'