Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Stupid to even want a discussion on this topic.
by on Sep 13, 2007 08:56 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

They say there is no evidence to suggest the existence of Ram, or Entire Ramayana. Just cause they did not get any evidence on it, does not mean you can trash the beliefs and faith of millions. If they had proof to prove the non-existence of Ramayana/Rama, they should show it and then make claims. When talking about Christianity or Islam, which are very recent and can be contradicted and to a great extent shown it CAN be false, then what to talk about Ramayana which was even much more earlier than the other 2 religions.
There may not be evidence to show that Vanarasena built the bridge but is there a way to prove how Valmiki sitting in one place mentioned places and events all the way from North to South and where the locals have monuments and events to tell, how can they all be so well aligned? I would ask readers to go this article i came about a couple of days ago: http://www.newindpress.com/sunday/colItems.asp?ID=SEC20030705031327
All of you who expressed your opinions here are all right. But how are we going to prove it to the god damn committee/court and the weird bloody government.
I think our religion and country are too accomodating and people use it against us.
We never tried to convert anyone, but the others - with their crusades and religious wars show how "good" their god is.
Is there proof of a Virgin giving birth to a baby? Is there proof of an angel talking to that Mohammed and telling him stuff when no one was around? Proof of Moses getting those comman

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Stupid to even want a discussion on this topic.
by on Sep 13, 2007 09:05 AM   Permalink
When they said earth was flat, they PROVED why earth was NOT flat. Thats a valid reason.
Just using the fact that a magazine like competitive success STATED that Valmiki was in 800 BC, is not the proof that Valmiki was in 800 BC. Iam actually curious where you got the number 170000 years back that Ramayana occured.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Stupid to even want a discussion on this topic.
by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 13, 2007 09:08 AM   Permalink

170000 is the right number ... but I wonder where he read it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Stupid to even want a discussion on this topic.
by rashmi sahu on Sep 13, 2007 09:30 AM   Permalink
God is there in every soul.It is the body which dies not soul

Further read autobiography of Yogi by swami paramhansa yogananda, and Living with himalayan masters - swami rama, Read about Lahiri mahashaya, Sri Yukteshwar giri then you will understand what a yogi is.

Swami paramhansa yoganandas body did not decay in America after death of 21 days.The certificate to this event was issued by mayoy of los angeles. -- Give me scientific reason ???? read yoga and veda you will get answer for this



   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Stupid to even want a discussion on this topic.
by Ganapati Hegde on Sep 13, 2007 09:02 AM   Permalink
ooye tere bakwas band kar

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'