They say there is no evidence to suggest the existence of Ram, or Entire Ramayana. Just cause they did not get any evidence on it, does not mean you can trash the beliefs and faith of millions. If they had proof to prove the non-existence of Ramayana/Rama, they should show it and then make claims. When talking about Christianity or Islam, which are very recent and can be contradicted and to a great extent shown it CAN be false, then what to talk about Ramayana which was even much more earlier than the other 2 religions. There may not be evidence to show that Vanarasena built the bridge but is there a way to prove how Valmiki sitting in one place mentioned places and events all the way from North to South and where the locals have monuments and events to tell, how can they all be so well aligned? I would ask readers to go this article i came about a couple of days ago: http://www.newindpress.com/sunday/colItems.asp?ID=SEC20030705031327 All of you who expressed your opinions here are all right. But how are we going to prove it to the god damn committee/court and the weird bloody government. I think our religion and country are too accomodating and people use it against us. We never tried to convert anyone, but the others - with their crusades and religious wars show how "good" their god is. Is there proof of a Virgin giving birth to a baby? Is there proof of an angel talking to that Mohammed and telling him stuff when no one was around? Proof of Moses getting those comman
