RE:Ramayan
by Cape Comorin on Nov 06, 2007 11:08 AM Permalink
Ramayan? For teaching the warefare using bows,arrows and pushbak viman? Sounds dangerous!
RE:Ramayan
by its me on Nov 06, 2007 11:36 AM Permalink
it is for value by Shree Ram Sacrifice for others, Courage, Devotion, Good ness for people . he shows the path, how to behave with parenets, Brothers, people, friends, The real democracy. Puspak Viman Shows inclination towards science.
RE:Ramayan
by Cape Comorin on Nov 06, 2007 11:43 AM Permalink
You are showing only good things from ramayana covering up the bad ones. Similarly every religious people will do. For you ramayana is a good book for muslims it is koran. Thats all. If you say koran is a false book why not ramayan a false book? If you find defects in koran one can easily find defects in ramayana as well.
RE:Ramayan
by its me on Nov 06, 2007 12:02 PM Permalink
You accepted good thing in ramayan. Concentrate on them . Thats give pakis more understanding of human behaviour.
RE:Ramayan
by Vinu on Nov 06, 2007 01:31 PM Permalink
Cape you are right, we should respect others believe too. Thats why in India muslim population is less still they are not week, they can fight. Hindu (as a whole)never come to fight against them, because we understand all are equal and respectable. hope you understand.
RE:Ramayan
by Cape Comorin on Nov 06, 2007 12:07 PM Permalink
It is easy to blame others. First let us look at our country. What is the level of human rights we have. How many rioters are punished so far? We are infact happy to make a person indulging anti-human activities as CM.
RE:Ramayan
by nirad mehta on Nov 06, 2007 01:58 PM Permalink
Raam, while undoubtedly having several excellent qualities that need to be emulated and imbibed, also had his shades of grey. He might be an example to everyone for the way one should treat parents and brothers, he can be hardly a role model for the way you should treat your wife. (There is no justification for leaving your pregnant wife in the jungle - and not even having the guts to do it yourself - getting your brother to do the dirty job - rather despicable, what!). For those who say that this is Uttar Ramayan and not Valmiki Ramayan, his treatment of Bali was even more despicable! Which warrior can justify shooting someone, who is not even your personal enemy, in the back, from hiding? (After getting confused the first time!) So, lets leave Ram out of it all and certainly lets leave Mandir out>
RE:Ramayan
by Shivkumar Singh on Nov 06, 2007 02:48 PM Permalink
Nirad "Read Right Honorable Srinivasa Sastri's Commentaries on Ramayana".
It is not that Rama was pleased doing what he did to Sita. He did that to ensure that the dignity of his position (ruler's) is not compromised (Ceaser's wife should be above suspicion).
On Vali-vad, there are interpretions that say that Raam killed Vali in battle. It must also be remembered that Vali was no saint (As an aside, I wish to add what Upanyasakarthas highlight as the LAW OF KARMA; they say that in subsequent Krishnavatara, Lord is allied with son of Inder, Arjun to kill the son of Surya, Karan. In Ramavatar, lord is a close friend of Sugriv, son of Surya and helps kill son of Indira, Vali). Assuming that Raam attacked from behind let us realise that even God when he manifests himself as a man, does mistakes by the force of situation (Vidhi).
If you look at Raam as a human not God, Raam still was a most remarkable personality who practised truthfullness, was brave and cared for righteousness above sentiment.
RE:Ramayan
by RAMESH MOHTA on Nov 06, 2007 01:00 PM Permalink
If one follow life style stated in Ramayan country will achieve the great height. Now forget about other religious people Hindus are not following Ramayan totally and that is making our sopciety less tolerance. The basic difference in Holy books are can be seen by the histry.
RE:Ramayan
by Rajagopal Nair on Nov 06, 2007 01:17 PM Permalink
Ram is struggling in India to find a place for him. Mandir Wahi Banyega bolke saal beeth gaya hai. But Mandir still remain a dream for Ram. It is also understood that ram had gone to Srilanka to settle there as there is no place in india for him. Phir kya padega ramayan.
RE:Ramayan
by its me on Nov 06, 2007 01:27 PM Permalink
mandir to wahi banega . Aaj nahi to kal. Sethu bhi rhega. Aaj bhi aur kal bhi Ram bhi rahega. Aaj bhi aur kal bhi
you should go to lanka . Shree Ram already clears it from demons for you
RE:RE:Ramayan
by ashish ranjan on Nov 06, 2007 01:28 PM Permalink
sir if u want to see ram try seeing him in ur hearts deepest region,otherwise all devils and demons RAVAR had also seen ram, but ram is a feeling ,its a wave its a name for absolute peace and tranquility one has to see him thru his inner eyes.
RE:Ramayan
by Vijay alias Teesmar Khan on Nov 06, 2007 01:53 PM Permalink
Ram lives in everyones heart. He does not need a temple at all. It is we, who need temple to remember him for ever.
