All nations must be more concerned over the developments in Pakistan.
India should prepare a contingent plan to strike at Nuclear Facilities before that goes into the hands of Terrorists.
US, UK, Russia, China, Japan, Germany France and ofcourse India must work on this matter how to secure all Nuclear weapons kept in Pakistan.
If country goes into Choas, if Musaraff is unable to control the situation, if the country heads for a disaster then Terrorists will snatch away the Nuclear weapons for their operation.
WORLD CANT THINK OF A CRUDE NUCLEAR BOMB IN THE HANDS OF TERRORISTS.
ALL NATIONS SHOULD ACT FAST TO SECURE THE NUCLEAR FACILITIES IN PAKISTAN.
I WOULD CALL SECURITY COUNCIL TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER IMMEDIATELY.
ONE CANNOT THINK OF A NATION HAVING NUCLEAR BOMB AND SIMULTANOUSLY HAVING SO MUCH POLITICAL UNREST.
PAKISTAN IS THE BEST EXAMPLE WHO SHOULD NOT POSSESS NUCLEAR WEAPEN.
RE:PAK NUCLEAR BOMBS SHOULD BE SAFE GUARDED
by Praveen George on Nov 05, 2007 01:53 AM Permalink
Yep, Containment of Pakistans Nuclear capabalities is a must.Imagine Al-Queida has access to nuclear weapon.India would be the first victim.UN agencies should actually think about this now as no one can even be sure if Musharaff himself goes nuts.In democracies the collective intelligence rarely allows hasty decisions , but that is not the case of autorcracies.Some action needs to be taken in this front.Pre emptive strike is a cruel proposition , guess UN agencies would do something in this regard
RE:PAK NUCLEAR BOMBS SHOULD BE SAFE GUARDED
by HA on Nov 05, 2007 01:44 AM Permalink
Musharraf is quite justified in his statement. He is the best bet, even today for India, USA and the WEST. America talks of civil liberties, but just before 35-40 years, white people did not sit with black people in Bus/Trains. Even today, racial undercurrents are present in the west. Similarly, the East is divided over religious/sectarian segments, and it will take a while before, a) various segments understand how to co-exist or b) some segments perish. As the option b is quite inhuman, the only option is option a. For that, we need to trust people like Musharraf, and give him more time. If it is at the cost of democracy, SO BE IT...
