Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Kashmir
by dharmesh kapasi on Mar 21, 2007 02:41 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Have any one think about Kargil Issue. Musharaf was the head of the army those days. What was the pakistan's policy behind acquiring kargil?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Kashmir
by Aditya on Mar 21, 2007 08:57 PM   Permalink
Nothing. Despite all of India's military deficiencies, they are still a lot better than Pakistan.
Musharraf himself has admitted that Kargil was another faliure for Pakistan. Of course he has conveniently blamed the whole thing on Nawaz Sharif.

From the Indian point of view the main thing to learn from that debacle is to never get caught sleeping on the job again... and to upgrade our technology in order to avoid turning thousands of Jawans and officers into cannon fodder.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Kashmir
by Shahryar Pax on Mar 22, 2007 12:09 AM   Permalink
Nisar Ali Khan, a former minister and trusted aid to Nawaz Sharif, described Musharraf as "a totally egocentric gentleman."

Army Chief Musharraf, remembering the shame of over 90,000 Pakistani soldiers captured as POWs in 1971, wanted a quick and easy victory by crossing the LOC and occupying the Kargil Heights whilst it was unoccupied by the Indians - he could not hold onto them and his men were left without supplies. To prevent another humiliation with Indians taking Pakistanis as POWs, he had to beg Sharif to ask the Americans to help negotiate a ceasefire!

No one remembers that the BJP Govt. in India were humiliated by Musharraf since Musharraf's Kargil misadventure put an end to their Lahore Peace initiative to settle the Kashmir issue.

His coup against Sharif was primarily to avoid a court-martial for the Kargil fiasco.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Musharraf has no future'