Did he (Richard Boucher) mean like "United Statesmen" (of America)like manner - i.e. Go on discussing of peace and stability and act in the exactly opposite way? Why is anybody in the world bothered about these shameless buffoons' certificate who preach one thing and practice the opposite? And why particularly Indian nationals bother at all as the "AID" from US of A is nothing but the noose around their neck in terms of "123 Agreement" and conversion bribes doled out wrapped in "Humanity causes"? Do we really need them? When shall we stop to feel proud of hollow words from some simple and pure hypocrite? How can it be a news to be prodly presented to Indians? It should be presented in sarcasm, instead.
RE:(United) Statesmen like?
by serious bloke on Mar 08, 2007 12:03 PM Permalink
Sorry Vinay India is dependent on US for a lot of things apart from IT jobs. Whatever you criticize you have to admit that US politicians do care for their country as a whole unlike Indian politicians who only care about caste vote-banks. Why are you so angry about hypocrites isnt India too a hypocrite? we dont want Pakistan to interfere to Kashmir fair enough but didnt we interfere in SL, isnt India dealing profitably with Myanmar whose rulers are murdererers ?. Just imagine an alterntate scenario where instead of west islamic countries dominate the world would you like that? Till we become a superpower we have to listen to US
RE:RE:(United) Statesmen like?
by Kishore Babu TVN on Mar 08, 2007 12:33 PM Permalink
Right,India might have interfered with SL or some other countries.This is all due to Congress and Indira sort of leaders who think that India is their dynasty. Not only with regards to Mayanmar even in seversl occasions our policy makers do what they think is correct but not what ppl want .
This got proved right from Nehru who blindly believed in his superstition concepts (Kashmir and china issues) and finally country paid and still paying for it.
Indira,even after Army capturing lahore and 90000 pak soliders left all, without settling Kashmir issue as she might have thought that she is queeen and can take any decision.Another example is Sikh terrorism, finally it got stopped as terrorists understood that it%u2019s the mistake of leaders and not that of ppl. Even Kashsmir terrorism also will stop once for all when terrorists realize it and signs are showing that most militants are giving it up, after coming out of brainwash.
Never attribute those things to country or ppl , those are blunders done by leaders even when ppl cried don%u2019t do such things, had ppl wanted those things rulers might have been continued doing them even till today.
