India should not accept the demand which will put us so dependable to others.
1) I consider Reprocessing rights of spent fuel & its reuse without any further payment is more critical factor than N-Test issue. Once, we allow the N-Commerce results in sizeable number of reactors, we will have no other option to abide whatever US & Co say for fuel to run N-Reactor. Let them see the advantage we offer interms of business & IAEA control over our civilian reactor. Main mantra is "Don't forget Tarapur issue & Don't rush".
2) Second part is, Return Clause which is guided by supreme national interest of US & India.It is not necessarily only with N-Test issue but also they could apply pressure tactics to control our Space/ICBM missile programme. Our defense policy is guided by the prevailing security surround us. If China & Pakistan tests N-Bomb, we may also need to do. If it just affects future N-Commerce cooperation, it is fine; But fuel supply guarantee should be of life time for installed reactors. There is some vocabulary change in the agreement that if US ends cooperation, it should not affect other country dealing with India. We should realize that other countries will simply toe the US line in this matter. So, We need to clearly define the boundary without ambiguity & without affecting once installed N-Reactors till its lifetime.
3) I feel that it is high time to involve well classified private industry as joint-venture under DAE/CAG surveillance inorder to advance
How the hell is your point related to the points discussed by Mr. Srinivasan Sathya?
WITHOUT THE CONSENT AND POSITIVE APPROVAL OF THE INDIAN SCIENTIFIC AND STRATEGIST COMMUNITY, THIS DEAL CANT BE PASSED AND SIGNED. THATS THE FINAL VERDICT. FOR VERY SIMPLE REASON THAT WE CANT BELIEVE THIS CONGRESS HEADED UPA WHICH HAS ALWAYS SUBMERGED INDIA. COME-ON BJP AND LEFT PARTIES, PLEASE DONT COMPLY WITH THE CONGRESS ASSURANCES WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF INDIAN SCIENTIFIC AND STRATEGIST COMMUNITY. WHATEVER CLAUSES, ORIGINAL 123 AGREEMENT HAS THAT SHOULD BE ACCEPTED BY AMERICA SINCE ITS PREPARED BY OUR STRATEGISTS. HYDE ACT WAS PASSED FOR THEIR(USA) OWN PARLIAMENT'S CLEARANCE. DEAL MUST NOT BE SIGNED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF INDIAN SCIENTIFIC AND STRTEGIST COMMUNITY. THATS FINAL.
RE:RE:RE:US intention is bad
by dull roots on Jun 03, 2007 05:22 PM Permalink
Yes, India can sign NPT as a N-have nation. The US led neo-colonials want India to sign NPT and give up all N-weapons, so that they can have 'free control' over the whole world for eternity. Well India will make them lose control and establish equitible International law.
RE:US intention is bad
by Mao TsePong on Jun 03, 2007 05:57 PM Permalink
well 196 country have already signed...including all major pwers, only 4 have no sign, so 196 cant be wrong ?
RE:RE:RE:RE:US intention is bad
by Mao TsePong on Jun 03, 2007 05:58 PM Permalink
whoo said u have to give up nuke after sign NPT ? u can still keep nuke....all russia, usa, china, uk, france...all keep nukes after sign NPT.
RE:US intention is bad
by Cool Dude on Jun 03, 2007 12:56 PM Permalink
Allow India into the security council with veto powers and declare it a fully neuclear state and we will comply.. till then...shut up
RE:US intention is bad
by Mao TsePong on Jun 03, 2007 02:01 PM Permalink
well amerika invited india to join UN security council in1950 but nehroo propsed chyna instaed...so who is at fault for refusing the offer ?
RE:US intention is bad
by dull roots on Jun 03, 2007 05:15 PM Permalink
Yes, anti-Colonial India stood by all third world nations then. It was aware how Britian had become a 'dummy' member in SC, and how Taiwan 'represented' China in SC. India was aware of the real need for stable consodilation of international law. Wait till India puts 'meter down' on N-deal!
RE:US intention is bad
by dull roots on Jun 03, 2007 05:29 PM Permalink
While the N-deal talks were going on, India made a statement opposing military action on Iran and also opposing even any economic sanctions. The message ought to have been clear on the outcome even then. If US does not play by rules, there is adequate Indian deterrance to make it comply.
RE:RE:US intention is bad
by dull roots on Jun 03, 2007 05:31 PM Permalink
So it is for US decision-makers to choose whether they recognize Indian law and Indian Constitution as a HONOURABLE CONSTITUTION and not pretend that Indian nukes are illegal. This neo-colonial strategy will not cut ice with India.
RE:RE:US intention is bad
by Mao TsePong on Jun 03, 2007 12:12 PM Permalink
also forget about the so-called "indiyan scientific kommunity"....they last won nobel pryze in science 1930.
RE:US intention is bad
by srinivasan sathya on Jun 03, 2007 12:40 PM Permalink
In life/economics, when you chase something it will elude. U stop run first & raise the level of inner strength & they will sure come at you. My simple solution is that instead of wasting time on this negotiation, just openup N-Sector to private sector Tata, Reliance, Infosys/Wipro with some level knowledge sharing & strict surveillance of external domestic agency. We can lead the world in this sector; Man don't forget we are the mind of 1 billion; if you give opportunity, they will excel.
RE:RE:US intention is bad
by Mao TsePong on Jun 03, 2007 01:30 PM Permalink
zat is not a bad idea......privatize everything for better effyciency . after all drdo defenze projekts like arjoon tankk and tejjas figher all no progesss....still equipment being imported from russia & izrael.
